Im shocked to see so many people on the Pats...
"FALSEHOOD NO. 1: The Patriots' defense is terrible.
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
"FALSEHOOD NO. 1: The Patriots' defense is terrible.
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
From CHFF ...
"FALSEHOOD NO. 1: The Patriots' defense is terrible.
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category....
The last 9 games NE has played has not seen a Top 10 QB except Flacco who is in the 10th spot....
They are 15th in the league in D scoring which is terrible...They allowed 24 points against a Giant team who did not have Nicks or Bradshaw...
They allowed 24 points to the Colts who are 30th in Offense and 28th in scoring.....This was done December 4th....
To say that their D is better is a joke.....
From CHFF ...
"FALSEHOOD NO. 1: The Patriots' defense is terrible.
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category....
The last 9 games NE has played has not seen a Top 10 QB except Flacco who is in the 10th spot....
They are 15th in the league in D scoring which is terrible...They allowed 24 points against a Giant team who did not have Nicks or Bradshaw...
They allowed 24 points to the Colts who are 30th in Offense and 28th in scoring.....This was done December 4th....
To say that their D is better is a joke.....
NE 13-3
NY 9-7
You have to take their records into consideration making NE the favorite.
This is the only reason I can see to making NE the favorite.
NE 13-3
NY 9-7
You have to take their records into consideration making NE the favorite.
This is the only reason I can see to making NE the favorite.
HOG WASH
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
HOG WASH
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
| Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category...." Actually, no. There are no other teams in this category, just the Pats DEFENSE. |
| Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category...." Actually, no. There are no other teams in this category, just the Pats DEFENSE. |
"
| Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category...." Actually, no. There are no other teams in this category, just the Pats DEFENSE. |
Wow thats a good Offense then.....For a team that faced 2 good Offenses all year.............
"
| Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category...." Actually, no. There are no other teams in this category, just the Pats DEFENSE. |
Wow thats a good Offense then.....For a team that faced 2 good Offenses all year.............
Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category....
The last 9 games NE has played has not seen a Top 10 QB except Flacco who is in the 10th spot....
They are 15th in the league in D scoring which is terrible...They allowed 24 points against a Giant team who did not have Nicks or Bradshaw...
They allowed 24 points to the Colts who are 30th in Offense and 28th in scoring.....This was done December 4th....
To say that their D is better is a joke.....
Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category....
The last 9 games NE has played has not seen a Top 10 QB except Flacco who is in the 10th spot....
They are 15th in the league in D scoring which is terrible...They allowed 24 points against a Giant team who did not have Nicks or Bradshaw...
They allowed 24 points to the Colts who are 30th in Offense and 28th in scoring.....This was done December 4th....
To say that their D is better is a joke.....
Freddy G ... BOL dude. ![]()
![]()
![]()
Just pick a side and let's get it ... this shit has been beaten to death for two weeks now here on Covers and everywhere else. Good luck to you but I am on NE. ![]()
Freddy G ... BOL dude. ![]()
![]()
![]()
Just pick a side and let's get it ... this shit has been beaten to death for two weeks now here on Covers and everywhere else. Good luck to you but I am on NE. ![]()
From CHFF ...
"FALSEHOOD NO. 1: The Patriots' defense is terrible.
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
The most meaningless stat of the decade, the Pats being the only team not to give-up more than 27 points.
So if they give-up 27 pts every game but never more that makes them better than a team that gave up 30 pts and 34 pts but gave-up 3 pts twice, 7 pts 3 times and 10 pts 4 times, according to the report the author would believe so.
From CHFF ...
"FALSEHOOD NO. 1: The Patriots' defense is terrible.
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
The most meaningless stat of the decade, the Pats being the only team not to give-up more than 27 points.
So if they give-up 27 pts every game but never more that makes them better than a team that gave up 30 pts and 34 pts but gave-up 3 pts twice, 7 pts 3 times and 10 pts 4 times, according to the report the author would believe so.
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
I believe the NY Giants play to their level of competition.. As a die hard fan , I believe the Giants are the better team.GL to the Patriots if you"re a fan. ![]()
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
I believe the NY Giants play to their level of competition.. As a die hard fan , I believe the Giants are the better team.GL to the Patriots if you"re a fan. ![]()
Why do I have to be a dipshit.. Relax..
Eli is playing extremely well right now. The Giants front four can generate more pressure than pretty much any other team the Pats have played this year. JPP for the win!
Giants 21-17
Why do I have to be a dipshit.. Relax..
Eli is playing extremely well right now. The Giants front four can generate more pressure than pretty much any other team the Pats have played this year. JPP for the win!
Giants 21-17
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
I believe the NY Giants play to their level of competition.. As a die hard fan , I believe the Giants are the better team.GL to the Patriots if you"re a fan. ![]()
Good man I'm not here to argue.It's nice to see someone not totally blind to the fact the Patriots can't win.Hell I'm smart enough to know the Giants can win.
I'm sure this will be a hell of a game.
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
I believe the NY Giants play to their level of competition.. As a die hard fan , I believe the Giants are the better team.GL to the Patriots if you"re a fan. ![]()
Good man I'm not here to argue.It's nice to see someone not totally blind to the fact the Patriots can't win.Hell I'm smart enough to know the Giants can win.
I'm sure this will be a hell of a game.
The reason that n england is the favorite is to even the money for betting action. If the giants were favorites I think it would be 70 - 30 on NE . If the spread was even still more on NE ,so they made NE favorites which I personally think is absurd thus you see a 60 - 40 edge for giants. I think they should have opened at even and see where action is going and adjust later like the N.C. game where Alabama became favorite. I bet moneyline on the g-men which I now regret because I think late money will come in on NE and they will win like the tide did.HOPE I AM WRONG
You are not wrong (and very cute too) the Niners would have beaten the Giants if not for 2 untimely miscues. Pats roll like the tide the back bay
The reason that n england is the favorite is to even the money for betting action. If the giants were favorites I think it would be 70 - 30 on NE . If the spread was even still more on NE ,so they made NE favorites which I personally think is absurd thus you see a 60 - 40 edge for giants. I think they should have opened at even and see where action is going and adjust later like the N.C. game where Alabama became favorite. I bet moneyline on the g-men which I now regret because I think late money will come in on NE and they will win like the tide did.HOPE I AM WRONG
You are not wrong (and very cute too) the Niners would have beaten the Giants if not for 2 untimely miscues. Pats roll like the tide the back bay
You are not wrong (and very cute too) the Niners would have beaten the Giants if not for 2 untimely miscues. Pats roll like the tide the back bay
And Baltimore would win if not for the dropped pass in the endzone...........
You are not wrong (and very cute too) the Niners would have beaten the Giants if not for 2 untimely miscues. Pats roll like the tide the back bay
And Baltimore would win if not for the dropped pass in the endzone...........
And Baltimore would win if not for the dropped pass in the endzone...........
You truely are a dick.No drop it was stripped. ![]()
Watch the replay numbnuts.
And Baltimore would win if not for the dropped pass in the endzone...........
You truely are a dick.No drop it was stripped. ![]()
Watch the replay numbnuts.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,986
-
Monday 9/14/2026
681
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,136
-
Couple Beers
2,241
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,689
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
97,243
-
Trump's legacy?
25,417
-
Week One-Post Week One Plays Here
1,864
-
Betting NFL isnt the same anymore Tapping out.
1,355
-
DEN/KC live in game comments welcome
740
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
