playoffs=1 and p:playoffs=0 and HD and line>2 and day!=Sunday
A home dog not playing on Sunday when their line is greater than +2 (that eliminates the Bears )
9-2 ATS
Texas last season won a playoff game as a home dog vs the Chargers.
playoffs=1 and p:playoffs=0 and HD and line>2 and day!=Sunday
A home dog not playing on Sunday when their line is greater than +2 (that eliminates the Bears )
9-2 ATS
Texas last season won a playoff game as a home dog vs the Chargers.
playoffs=1 and p:playoffs=0 and HD and line>2 and day!=Sunday
A home dog not playing on Sunday when their line is greater than +2 (that eliminates the Bears )
9-2 ATS
Texas last season won a playoff game as a home dog vs the Chargers.
Rams were a home dog also last season on MNF in wildcard round vs Vikings & won SU.
Rams were a home dog also last season on MNF in wildcard round vs Vikings & won SU.
I have the Rams making the Super Bowl and this line gives them a lot of credibility to achieve that.
in this case though it’s too much credibility to the line. The History, even only 11 previous results, proves this.
I have the Rams making the Super Bowl and this line gives them a lot of credibility to achieve that.
in this case though it’s too much credibility to the line. The History, even only 11 previous results, proves this.
That game was played in Arizona because of the fires in SoCal.
That game was played in Arizona because of the fires in SoCal.
Players and teams and what they have done in the current season?
playoffs are different
Past road playoff teams laying -7 or more are 1-2 SU and 0-3 ATS
Clearly it is not the sample size I trust fully but the results are congruent and indicative of what I believe is a hole in betting mindsets. In the playoffs what happened in the regular season is now you see it now you don’t (in some cases).
I will say if the best teams, lower seeds, were to be involved, I would give these quality teams more credibility but that’s not the case with the 5 seeded Rams. The Rams are good but seeded 5th and lined this way, history has shown this is a potential set up for failure.
Then after this game if they win that bring less attention because of the failure.
That also gives the Rams credibility after being lined so high.
If the Rams advance as they should, I will ride them the rest of the way based upon this line valuation.
Rams and Patriots are my best fades this week and I suspect I will minimum win one of these. My expectations are 2-0
Players and teams and what they have done in the current season?
playoffs are different
Past road playoff teams laying -7 or more are 1-2 SU and 0-3 ATS
Clearly it is not the sample size I trust fully but the results are congruent and indicative of what I believe is a hole in betting mindsets. In the playoffs what happened in the regular season is now you see it now you don’t (in some cases).
I will say if the best teams, lower seeds, were to be involved, I would give these quality teams more credibility but that’s not the case with the 5 seeded Rams. The Rams are good but seeded 5th and lined this way, history has shown this is a potential set up for failure.
Then after this game if they win that bring less attention because of the failure.
That also gives the Rams credibility after being lined so high.
If the Rams advance as they should, I will ride them the rest of the way based upon this line valuation.
Rams and Patriots are my best fades this week and I suspect I will minimum win one of these. My expectations are 2-0
yea let’s add to the ROI on these.
yea let’s add to the ROI on these.
they better pick up the pace or yet another unsuccessful ATS spread attempt for your very poor ROI this season
they better pick up the pace or yet another unsuccessful ATS spread attempt for your very poor ROI this season
On the same sides Spottie! Good luck to both of us! Still pondering the Sunday games. Watching the line and injury report in the 49ers-Eagles game in particular. Leaning SF at +6. ![]()
On the same sides Spottie! Good luck to both of us! Still pondering the Sunday games. Watching the line and injury report in the 49ers-Eagles game in particular. Leaning SF at +6. ![]()
Now 0-7 and 0-5
Now 0-7 and 0-5
All the Noah blah blah about old and out of date history
“the game has changed from those old seasons“The books haven’t changed and those smart one are still making the lines and killing the weak.
All the Noah blah blah about old and out of date history
“the game has changed from those old seasons“The books haven’t changed and those smart one are still making the lines and killing the weak.
Bears did win and cover. I’m my other thread I got a small piece of the +350 but not the elite +1400 or higher.
Bears did win and cover. I’m my other thread I got a small piece of the +350 but not the elite +1400 or higher.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.