Everyone on chiefs

And I’m still seeing -7. 

bloodbath incoming.

Lol nah 

you took the time to poll every bet placed on this game? Interesting

I think he's right.

There's gotta be a first time for everything

@UglyKidJoe

 I am right. People on covers suck at capping and every post I see is on chiefs  

@BWS77

 Lol bro hit my last 10 college basketball plays keep cherry picking.

Was that after your original pick buyout then hit it live at huge juice?   Impressive!

@BWS77

 How anyone still takes you seriously after that college football season you strung together. Give it up old timer you s*ck!

Are you taking Cincy and the pts?

Cincy is Buffalo lite without a defense.  I can’t see them being able to stop Mahomes & co nor do I think their offense can go blow to blow with KC.

plenty of posts of people on Bengals, maybe get your eyes checked 

Then go ahead and take Cincy

@DialedCaper7

 you hit your last 10?  Laughable seeing you had Mich St. ML and said Illi can't win without "those two guys" on 1/25/22.  Lying POS!  You are worthless in here....

@Bonacuse44

 Cinci is Buffalo lite with a defense? Bro, Bills had the #1 Defense in the NFL. Wtf are you taking about? 

Not all games are bet 50/50 despite any line moves and despite what some people think...I think this is one of them and from what I gather, there is lopsided action on KC. 

Is there a side that the books might need come Sunday? I think they will be rooting for the Bengals to cover the number. If an outcome needs to be massaged that is what the refs are for. 
 

Bob Scucci the Vice President of Race and Sports for Boyd Gaming Corp used to be the weekly guest on a radio show called 'Behind the Bets' in Vegas with Chad Millman. He blew a lot of the standard notions out of the water...one of them was that sometimes a book will take a stand on a number even though they are getting pounded on one of the sides. 

I know the number has fluctuated on this one back and forth between 7 and 7 1/2...so the stand hasn't been firm...I suspect that the Bengals will cover. 

@lancer89074

 So now if the underdog covers it’s because the refs had to help em? 

got it 

I’m sure the multi billion dollar NFL wants to hurt their image by letting refs and players and coaches all be told what to do for “Vegas” cause they NEED a side in a game, lmao books lose on games all the time, they also win on games all the time, their advantage always was and us and always will be the fact they get to charge the vig, I’m pretty sure there will never be even 1 single game that is exact even money on both sides of a line, ever, in any sport, there’s too many “books” to ever accomplish that fact so yes if they take a beating here with the chiefs they will pay out the difference, they also did fairly well last weekend with the Packers and Buccaneers losing no? Think they can stomach an L without having to get shady in the least bit

@philschnaars

Amazing that you haven't noticed that some outcomes of games have been influenced by refs with their calls and noncalls for many years now. No coaches or players are involved...
 

@BeeRich

 Mich st covered losers try again.

Better not look in the MMA forum  

@BWS77

 You on bengals ? If so I’m buying out 

Where are you seeing that everyone is on the Chiefs??? 

Im seeing that it is pretty even here at covers, and the line is also showing it is even.

on the 12 threads he opened on covers