Got the Saints @+450 on bet 365 for the superbowl. Also played the Saints -9.5 (bought the hook) 7k to win 5k. Reasons listed below..
for Detroit to do anything in the playoffs that was a must win. You like
all Lions backers are fooling themselves..U refuse to accept the
reality of the situation. How can you argue what the cast iron points I
have made below? U can't is the answer..
These silly theories and looking for things that simply are not
there.Saints have been blowing teams away because they are a good
football team. The Lions were desperate to win yesterday. Win and they
are away to New York/Dallas and they would fancy their chances and have
momentum going into the playoffs. Lose and its off to to a 13-3 team on
fire and a serious dent to the confidence.
Don't over think (that
is what you are doing) the facts are simple. Detroit couldn't beat a
team playing backups with nothing to play for. They now have to go on
the road to the hottest team in football. People are focusing way to
much a last year, which has nothing whatsoever got to do with this year.
The Saints will use last year as motivation, that's the only stat you
have to worry about from last year. The Lions have already been beaten
by the Saints and this is the last place they would have wanted to go
(bar Green bay)..
The problem for Detroit is that they are far
too one dimensional. They don't have a rushing game, so the Saints can
afford to drop extra players back in coverage. Detroit is 26th against
the rush and I see NO running more then expected. If the run gets going
how can they stop Brees? They can't. New Orleans is a FAR better
football team then Detroit. That is the only stat that matters. So far
this season anytime Detroit has faced top ranked opposition it hasn't
covered the spread. The line is set this high to reel in the Lions
Backers and it seems many on this site has fallen for the Line.
Fade
Detroit in a dome against a top team always! If you don't have balance
on offense against the top teams you get exposed (as has been
proven)..This will be Detroit playing catchup and Stafford making
mistakes. Saints will win by more then 14 this time...
Good
football teams don't lose must win games against their biggest rivals
playing backups! This is the point that is just not registering with
you.
If they win they have a legitimate shot at beating the
Giants and then who knows. They haven't beaten (or covered the spread)
against the elite teams in the NFC. Green Bay, San Francisco, New
Orleans. They couldn't get it done last week when they badly needed to
and know you expect a team who hasn't shown any kind of winning
mentality against the top teams to suddenly turn it on!
The
public preception that Detroit is not a very good team is spot on and I
am quite sure will cost you again. There is no hidden agenda or secret
here. Even if Detroit covers, New Orleans was the correct play pre game
based on Factual Evidence...
1) New Orleans has covered the spread in every home game this season.. 2) Detroit has failed to cover the spread against the better teams this season....
To
bet against New Orleans (even if you are lucky enough to get a back
door cover) is the incorrect play and your reasons for playing it are
either invalid of incorrect...Detroit is too one demensional on offence
and too atrocious on defense to keep this close..
Lions young immature team on the road against a team with playoff experience, superbowl winners and hasn't left home for 3 weeks. 10.5 and you can be hit with the back door cover..Buy the hook and enjoy the game in peace..
0
Got the Saints @+450 on bet 365 for the superbowl. Also played the Saints -9.5 (bought the hook) 7k to win 5k. Reasons listed below..
for Detroit to do anything in the playoffs that was a must win. You like
all Lions backers are fooling themselves..U refuse to accept the
reality of the situation. How can you argue what the cast iron points I
have made below? U can't is the answer..
These silly theories and looking for things that simply are not
there.Saints have been blowing teams away because they are a good
football team. The Lions were desperate to win yesterday. Win and they
are away to New York/Dallas and they would fancy their chances and have
momentum going into the playoffs. Lose and its off to to a 13-3 team on
fire and a serious dent to the confidence.
Don't over think (that
is what you are doing) the facts are simple. Detroit couldn't beat a
team playing backups with nothing to play for. They now have to go on
the road to the hottest team in football. People are focusing way to
much a last year, which has nothing whatsoever got to do with this year.
The Saints will use last year as motivation, that's the only stat you
have to worry about from last year. The Lions have already been beaten
by the Saints and this is the last place they would have wanted to go
(bar Green bay)..
The problem for Detroit is that they are far
too one dimensional. They don't have a rushing game, so the Saints can
afford to drop extra players back in coverage. Detroit is 26th against
the rush and I see NO running more then expected. If the run gets going
how can they stop Brees? They can't. New Orleans is a FAR better
football team then Detroit. That is the only stat that matters. So far
this season anytime Detroit has faced top ranked opposition it hasn't
covered the spread. The line is set this high to reel in the Lions
Backers and it seems many on this site has fallen for the Line.
Fade
Detroit in a dome against a top team always! If you don't have balance
on offense against the top teams you get exposed (as has been
proven)..This will be Detroit playing catchup and Stafford making
mistakes. Saints will win by more then 14 this time...
Good
football teams don't lose must win games against their biggest rivals
playing backups! This is the point that is just not registering with
you.
If they win they have a legitimate shot at beating the
Giants and then who knows. They haven't beaten (or covered the spread)
against the elite teams in the NFC. Green Bay, San Francisco, New
Orleans. They couldn't get it done last week when they badly needed to
and know you expect a team who hasn't shown any kind of winning
mentality against the top teams to suddenly turn it on!
The
public preception that Detroit is not a very good team is spot on and I
am quite sure will cost you again. There is no hidden agenda or secret
here. Even if Detroit covers, New Orleans was the correct play pre game
based on Factual Evidence...
1) New Orleans has covered the spread in every home game this season.. 2) Detroit has failed to cover the spread against the better teams this season....
To
bet against New Orleans (even if you are lucky enough to get a back
door cover) is the incorrect play and your reasons for playing it are
either invalid of incorrect...Detroit is too one demensional on offence
and too atrocious on defense to keep this close..
Lions young immature team on the road against a team with playoff experience, superbowl winners and hasn't left home for 3 weeks. 10.5 and you can be hit with the back door cover..Buy the hook and enjoy the game in peace..
new orleans is a different team on the road. If i get sf at 3 pts or less im gonna unload on this play. New orleans road record speaks for itself and in the playoffs ill take a good D over a good O anyday.
their 5-3 on the road? how bad can it be? Since Payton an Brees have been in New Orleans they have the best road record in the NFL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Look it up..yall better quit listening to the National Media about this road record crap.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigtony29:
new orleans is a different team on the road. If i get sf at 3 pts or less im gonna unload on this play. New orleans road record speaks for itself and in the playoffs ill take a good D over a good O anyday.
their 5-3 on the road? how bad can it be? Since Payton an Brees have been in New Orleans they have the best road record in the NFL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Look it up..yall better quit listening to the National Media about this road record crap.
Final plays this weekend and I have changed my mind on a few
1) NO to win Superbowl +450 2) NO to beat Lions -9.5 (bought the hook) 3) Cincinatti +3. I think you have to take the points against a team thats lost three in a row with a 3rd string quarterback and a bum shoulder. Bar the Pittsburgh blowout, Cincy has played everyone close. 4) Giants to beat Falcons -3. Hard to back against GMEN here, even though I like the Falcons.. 5) Denver +9 against Steelers. Just a hunch
0
Final plays this weekend and I have changed my mind on a few
1) NO to win Superbowl +450 2) NO to beat Lions -9.5 (bought the hook) 3) Cincinatti +3. I think you have to take the points against a team thats lost three in a row with a 3rd string quarterback and a bum shoulder. Bar the Pittsburgh blowout, Cincy has played everyone close. 4) Giants to beat Falcons -3. Hard to back against GMEN here, even though I like the Falcons.. 5) Denver +9 against Steelers. Just a hunch
Final plays this weekend and I have changed my mind on a few
1) NO to win Superbowl +450 2) NO to beat Lions -9.5 (bought the hook) 3) Cincinatti +3. I think you have to take the points against a team thats lost three in a row with a 3rd string quarterback and a bum shoulder. Bar the Pittsburgh blowout, Cincy has played everyone close. 4) Giants to beat Falcons -3. Hard to back against GMEN here, even though I like the Falcons.. 5) Denver +9 against Steelers. Just a hunch
You already said in your first post you had +330 WITH the exact bet amount of 3k to win 10k. Now because of my post you automatically change it to +450? This can only mean one of two things:
1.) You really did place the bet at +330 and now you realize how badly you got
ripped off so you scrambled to find a site with fair market value to pan
off as your new bet.
2.) You lied about the first bet being placed all together and/or the bet amount. I mean seriously, who puts exact bet amounts if that bet wasn't even the one that was placed? You have the ability to scratch that bet completely and take a new bet at a better price? Wish I had that ability.
One of the above is the correct answer. In addition, I hope for your sake that write-up wasn't copy and pasted from someone else on the net. Wouldn't be the first time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
Final plays this weekend and I have changed my mind on a few
1) NO to win Superbowl +450 2) NO to beat Lions -9.5 (bought the hook) 3) Cincinatti +3. I think you have to take the points against a team thats lost three in a row with a 3rd string quarterback and a bum shoulder. Bar the Pittsburgh blowout, Cincy has played everyone close. 4) Giants to beat Falcons -3. Hard to back against GMEN here, even though I like the Falcons.. 5) Denver +9 against Steelers. Just a hunch
You already said in your first post you had +330 WITH the exact bet amount of 3k to win 10k. Now because of my post you automatically change it to +450? This can only mean one of two things:
1.) You really did place the bet at +330 and now you realize how badly you got
ripped off so you scrambled to find a site with fair market value to pan
off as your new bet.
2.) You lied about the first bet being placed all together and/or the bet amount. I mean seriously, who puts exact bet amounts if that bet wasn't even the one that was placed? You have the ability to scratch that bet completely and take a new bet at a better price? Wish I had that ability.
One of the above is the correct answer. In addition, I hope for your sake that write-up wasn't copy and pasted from someone else on the net. Wouldn't be the first time.
Gotta love paying -140 (assuming you're not lying about that price either) juice to buy the hook despite having "cast iron" reasons that Detroit apparently has 0 chance in hell of hanging with the Saints.
0
Gotta love paying -140 (assuming you're not lying about that price either) juice to buy the hook despite having "cast iron" reasons that Detroit apparently has 0 chance in hell of hanging with the Saints.
You already said in your first post you had +330 WITH the exact bet amount of 3k to win 10k. Now because of my post you automatically change it to +450? This can only mean one of two things:
1.) You really did place the bet at +330 and now you realize how badly you got ripped off so you scrambled to find a site with fair market value to pan off as your new bet.
2.) You lied about the first bet being placed all together and/or the bet amount. I mean seriously, who puts exact bet amounts if that bet wasn't even the one that was placed? You have the ability to scratch that bet completely and take a new bet at a better price? Wish I had that ability.
One of the above is the correct answer. In addition, I hope for your sake that write-up wasn't copy and pasted from someone else on the net. Wouldn't be the first time.
Non this thread related, Pats -115 to win AFC Conference from my book, overpriced? Thx!
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
You already said in your first post you had +330 WITH the exact bet amount of 3k to win 10k. Now because of my post you automatically change it to +450? This can only mean one of two things:
1.) You really did place the bet at +330 and now you realize how badly you got ripped off so you scrambled to find a site with fair market value to pan off as your new bet.
2.) You lied about the first bet being placed all together and/or the bet amount. I mean seriously, who puts exact bet amounts if that bet wasn't even the one that was placed? You have the ability to scratch that bet completely and take a new bet at a better price? Wish I had that ability.
One of the above is the correct answer. In addition, I hope for your sake that write-up wasn't copy and pasted from someone else on the net. Wouldn't be the first time.
Non this thread related, Pats -115 to win AFC Conference from my book, overpriced? Thx!
Gotta love paying -140 (assuming you're not lying about that price either) juice to buy the hook despite having "cast iron" reasons that Detroit apparently has 0 chance in hell of hanging with the Saints.
Clever stuff from FL4wL3s5. People should check him out more.
0
Quote Originally Posted by FL4wL3s5:
Gotta love paying -140 (assuming you're not lying about that price either) juice to buy the hook despite having "cast iron" reasons that Detroit apparently has 0 chance in hell of hanging with the Saints.
Clever stuff from FL4wL3s5. People should check him out more.
Non this thread related, Pats -115 to win AFC Conference from my book, overpriced? Thx!
Horribly overpriced. Personally I think they should be in the +150 range with 2 potential back to backs against the AFC North but fair market value is +110 minimum. Can't lay juice on that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Non this thread related, Pats -115 to win AFC Conference from my book, overpriced? Thx!
Horribly overpriced. Personally I think they should be in the +150 range with 2 potential back to backs against the AFC North but fair market value is +110 minimum. Can't lay juice on that.
You already said in your first post you had +330 WITH the exact bet amount of 3k to win 10k. Now because of my post you automatically change it to +450? This can only mean one of two things:
1.) You really did place the bet at +330 and now you realize how badly you got
ripped off so you scrambled to find a site with fair market value to pan
off as your new bet.
2.) You lied about the first bet being placed all together and/or the bet amount. I mean seriously, who puts exact bet amounts if that bet wasn't even the one that was placed? You have the ability to scratch that bet completely and take a new bet at a better price? Wish I had that ability.
One of the above is the correct answer. In addition, I hope for your sake that write-up wasn't copy and pasted from someone else on the net. Wouldn't be the first time.
Yes I took the 330 and more fool me, I am making the point 450 is available..My apologies for the confusion
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
You already said in your first post you had +330 WITH the exact bet amount of 3k to win 10k. Now because of my post you automatically change it to +450? This can only mean one of two things:
1.) You really did place the bet at +330 and now you realize how badly you got
ripped off so you scrambled to find a site with fair market value to pan
off as your new bet.
2.) You lied about the first bet being placed all together and/or the bet amount. I mean seriously, who puts exact bet amounts if that bet wasn't even the one that was placed? You have the ability to scratch that bet completely and take a new bet at a better price? Wish I had that ability.
One of the above is the correct answer. In addition, I hope for your sake that write-up wasn't copy and pasted from someone else on the net. Wouldn't be the first time.
Yes I took the 330 and more fool me, I am making the point 450 is available..My apologies for the confusion
Gotta love paying -140 (assuming you're not lying about that price either) juice to buy the hook despite having "cast iron" reasons that Detroit apparently has 0 chance in hell of hanging with the Saints.
No never said that. I strongly believe the Saints will cover, but no bet is a guareented winner. I mean the Saints could be 24 points up with 3 minutes to play and two late touchdowns kill my bet. Better to be a little safe. 9.5 is safe and its not much extra juice to lay...
0
Quote Originally Posted by FL4wL3s5:
Gotta love paying -140 (assuming you're not lying about that price either) juice to buy the hook despite having "cast iron" reasons that Detroit apparently has 0 chance in hell of hanging with the Saints.
No never said that. I strongly believe the Saints will cover, but no bet is a guareented winner. I mean the Saints could be 24 points up with 3 minutes to play and two late touchdowns kill my bet. Better to be a little safe. 9.5 is safe and its not much extra juice to lay...
Horribly overpriced. Personally I think they should be in the +150 range with 2 potential back to backs against the AFC North but fair market value is +110 minimum. Can't lay juice on that.
Unless Pats are playing Denver next week and Houston in Conference final, yeah Pats -115 is damn overpriced.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
Horribly overpriced. Personally I think they should be in the +150 range with 2 potential back to backs against the AFC North but fair market value is +110 minimum. Can't lay juice on that.
Unless Pats are playing Denver next week and Houston in Conference final, yeah Pats -115 is damn overpriced.
No never said that. I strongly believe the Saints will cover, but no bet is a guareented winner. I mean the Saints could be 24 points up with 3 minutes to play and two late touchdowns kill my bet. Better to be a little safe. 9.5 is safe and its not much extra juice to lay...
Hooks are lovely aren't they!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
No never said that. I strongly believe the Saints will cover, but no bet is a guareented winner. I mean the Saints could be 24 points up with 3 minutes to play and two late touchdowns kill my bet. Better to be a little safe. 9.5 is safe and its not much extra juice to lay...
No chance. New Orleans wont even bother to run on San Fran. This line is -3 to the Saints. San Fran doesnt have the firepower to keep up. Very over rated team that will get brutally exposed IF the Saints win this weekend.
who dat??
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
No chance. New Orleans wont even bother to run on San Fran. This line is -3 to the Saints. San Fran doesnt have the firepower to keep up. Very over rated team that will get brutally exposed IF the Saints win this weekend.
rarely. search for me..yes at times I lose but I hit so much. the most under rated capper on covers..denver may lose well but if you follow me for the playoffs u win...
next week
1) PATS - whatever against denver/pitt
2) Packers - whatever against Giants
3) Saints -3 against 49ers
4) baltmiore v houston under
where are ur picks> what do you offer? love or hate me I make money simple as..
0
rarely. search for me..yes at times I lose but I hit so much. the most under rated capper on covers..denver may lose well but if you follow me for the playoffs u win...
next week
1) PATS - whatever against denver/pitt
2) Packers - whatever against Giants
3) Saints -3 against 49ers
4) baltmiore v houston under
where are ur picks> what do you offer? love or hate me I make money simple as..
Look at the niners schedule. Who have the beat! No one! The Saints matchup really well against them..The weakness of the Saints is an area the 49ers can't take advantage of. The pass d. The 49ers are awesome against the run and I expect the Saints to run little against them..Instead use lots of little screen plays to keep the Niners honest.
Saints have a great run D and if they get a lead the 49ers are not built to chase games..This will be the easiest game to cap this year if it happens..Saints are for real...
They still haven't beaten anyone. Keep telling everyone that. It was a fluke that they forced more than 4 turnovers. Smith is still a "game manager" and their D couldn't stop the Saints at all yesterday.
The 49ers are a 1-hit wonder.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
Look at the niners schedule. Who have the beat! No one! The Saints matchup really well against them..The weakness of the Saints is an area the 49ers can't take advantage of. The pass d. The 49ers are awesome against the run and I expect the Saints to run little against them..Instead use lots of little screen plays to keep the Niners honest.
Saints have a great run D and if they get a lead the 49ers are not built to chase games..This will be the easiest game to cap this year if it happens..Saints are for real...
They still haven't beaten anyone. Keep telling everyone that. It was a fluke that they forced more than 4 turnovers. Smith is still a "game manager" and their D couldn't stop the Saints at all yesterday.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.