All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Bears (-2.5) vs Seahawks (+2.5)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1013
Posts: 16
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 266
Posted: #1
Is it just me? or is this game line just to good to turn down???
 
I caught it on Monday at -1.5 for the Bears, jumped on that, layed down 300$ on the Bears. Liked it so much, I bet more at 2.5, and bought half a point. Basically have 500$ running on game.
 
Bears better offense, better defense, better ST's. Only thing that worries me is, game is played in Seattle, with the 12th man. And Cutler has that gun slinger attitude.
 
And Hasslebeck is out, replaced by Sinoco Wallace who is manageable, but IMO gives them even a lesser chance of winning.
 
I just don't see how a slighty better 4-11 Seahawks team beats the bears, with Sinoco Wallace as Qb.
 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 543
Posted: #2
Haven't heard that line if it sounds too good to be true it probably is.

Sucker Bet 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 266
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by WildChild916:

Haven't heard that line if it sounds too good to be true it probably is.

Sucker Bet 

Yuh, I saw your other post about it. Hawks have 12 starters out plus Hasslebeck... Vs a team thats better in the 3 area's of the game.

Are you trying to tell me game is fixed cause line is fishy? lol. I'll take my chances.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 50
Posted: #4
You would have more credibility if you knew what the Seahawks QB's name actually was.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 5253
Posted: #5
Hawks are much better at home. I expect seneca to play better after taking all the reps
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1509
Posted: #6
don't remember the stat exactley, but he team who beats the Super Bowl champs (Bears week 2) tend to suck balls the week after.

Especially if they are on the road.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 69
Posted: #7
All these trends... lol they are so funny.  I'm with you Blanket, pick a game based on who is playing and not based on trends set by players they may or may not be on the team anymore.  GO BEARS!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 543
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by midnight_toker:

don't remember the stat exactley, but he team who beats the Super Bowl champs (Bears week 2) tend to suck balls the week after.

Especially if they are on the road.

Following this trend along with others.  Seattle is a VERY strong play for me this week.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 266
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by WildChild916:


Following this trend along with others.  Seattle is a VERY strong play for me this week.  


How much do you have on the line if you don't mind me asking?

btw I parlayed some games taking Seattle, just in case. But my main bet is still the Bears.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 12676
Posted: #10
Everyone on the Bears....give me the Hawks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 266
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by tsw:

Everyone on the Bears....give me the Hawks.


I take it you bet the Dolphins, when they didn't cover vs the Colts last week then?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 27235
Posted: #12
Hawks look like the play
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 266
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by ratherBgambling:

Hawks look like the play

 

lol Why??? Hawks got 12 starters out, including their starting QB. Even if Hawks were 100% healhty, the Bears have the better defense, the better offense, and the better ST's.

You trying to tell me vagas knows something that everyone doesn't? Or you trying to tell me the game is fixed?

Everyone took the Colts on Monday night, and the Colts covered.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1154
Posted: #14
THe Seahawks are terrible and I'm a Seahawk homer. The reason this line is fishy is because Seattle plays so well at home. Its also arguably the most difficult stadium to play in in the NFL.

Seneca also isn't a scrub, he's not starter talent but he has held it down for a couple of years.

For me this game is a NO PLAY. I would lean towards the bears as the Hawks can't stop the run and can't run the ball themsevles, however anything can happen at QWEST field.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1059
Posted: #15
Bears blast the hawks, somone please tell me how you think the seahawks are going to score, offense is terrible wallace is a to waiting to happen
 
bears 27
hawks 10
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 647
Posted: #16
I think the reason for the low line is the way Cutler played against the cheese heads at their stadium. He threw 4 picks away from home and playing at QWEST field is the most hostile environment in all of football. Reasoning with that you can see why the line is at where it is but still... in basically a pickem game edge to the bears. FYI being a Rams fan it's probably the most frustrating things to watch when your stupid team can't even get play calls right when it's too loud and not to mention all the extra penalties that come with playing there. PUMMEL THOSE HAWKS AND SPIT IN THEIR FRIGGIN FACES I HATE THEM ALL.
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.