thanks....i've been waiting for you to come into a thread to ask you a question.
does the girl in your pic have her right leg amputated? I don't see it.
Maybe its a subliminal message for 'half-ass'? Let me know.
Well if you take a closer look at the pic, there are creases on where the right leg is resting on the couch. Just pay attention. If she her right leg was amputated like you say, she would not be that stable in that position. Good luck with the game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
thanks....i've been waiting for you to come into a thread to ask you a question.
does the girl in your pic have her right leg amputated? I don't see it.
Maybe its a subliminal message for 'half-ass'? Let me know.
Well if you take a closer look at the pic, there are creases on where the right leg is resting on the couch. Just pay attention. If she her right leg was amputated like you say, she would not be that stable in that position. Good luck with the game.
scalabrine what do you think about Bator aruments: "
Last season there were six home teams in the playoffs that were
favored following a game where they won SU as favorites after coming
back from a double-digit deficit. These six home teams all won,
winning by margins of 30,24,6,17,18, and 30 points. They went 6-0
ATS. The Hornets were involved twice, crushing the Mavericks, 127-103,
and blowing out the Spurs, 102-84.
In the 2007 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they both won and covered easily.
In the 2006 playoffs, there were three home teams that fit this
situation, and all three were small favorites like the Hornets tonight,
and all three won by double digits.
In the 2005 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they won by 25 points and 21 points.
In the 2004 playoffs, there was one home team that fit this situation, and they won by 16 points.
In the 2003 playoffs, there were three more. The results? Romp, romp, and romp. "
MrBator waht do you think about scalabrine arguments?
0
scalabrine vs MrBator
scalabrine what do you think about Bator aruments: "
Last season there were six home teams in the playoffs that were
favored following a game where they won SU as favorites after coming
back from a double-digit deficit. These six home teams all won,
winning by margins of 30,24,6,17,18, and 30 points. They went 6-0
ATS. The Hornets were involved twice, crushing the Mavericks, 127-103,
and blowing out the Spurs, 102-84.
In the 2007 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they both won and covered easily.
In the 2006 playoffs, there were three home teams that fit this
situation, and all three were small favorites like the Hornets tonight,
and all three won by double digits.
In the 2005 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they won by 25 points and 21 points.
In the 2004 playoffs, there was one home team that fit this situation, and they won by 16 points.
In the 2003 playoffs, there were three more. The results? Romp, romp, and romp. "
MrBator waht do you think about scalabrine arguments?
scalabrine what do you think about Bator aruments: "
Last season there were six home teams in the playoffs that were
favored following a game where they won SU as favorites after coming
back from a double-digit deficit. These six home teams all won,
winning by margins of 30,24,6,17,18, and 30 points. They went 6-0
ATS. The Hornets were involved twice, crushing the Mavericks, 127-103,
and blowing out the Spurs, 102-84.
In the 2007 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they both won and covered easily.
In the 2006 playoffs, there were three home teams that fit this
situation, and all three were small favorites like the Hornets tonight,
and all three won by double digits.
In the 2005 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they won by 25 points and 21 points.
In the 2004 playoffs, there was one home team that fit this situation, and they won by 16 points.
In the 2003 playoffs, there were three more. The results? Romp, romp, and romp. "
MrBator waht do you think about scalabrine arguments?
One of the bigger reasons I'm on the Hornets in this one.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PobiegliBlisko:
scalabrine vs MrBator
scalabrine what do you think about Bator aruments: "
Last season there were six home teams in the playoffs that were
favored following a game where they won SU as favorites after coming
back from a double-digit deficit. These six home teams all won,
winning by margins of 30,24,6,17,18, and 30 points. They went 6-0
ATS. The Hornets were involved twice, crushing the Mavericks, 127-103,
and blowing out the Spurs, 102-84.
In the 2007 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they both won and covered easily.
In the 2006 playoffs, there were three home teams that fit this
situation, and all three were small favorites like the Hornets tonight,
and all three won by double digits.
In the 2005 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they won by 25 points and 21 points.
In the 2004 playoffs, there was one home team that fit this situation, and they won by 16 points.
In the 2003 playoffs, there were three more. The results? Romp, romp, and romp. "
MrBator waht do you think about scalabrine arguments?
One of the bigger reasons I'm on the Hornets in this one.
scalabrine what do you think about Bator aruments: "
Last season there were six home teams in the playoffs that were favored following a game where they won SU as favorites after coming back from a double-digit deficit. These six home teams all won, winning by margins of 30,24,6,17,18, and 30 points. They went 6-0 ATS. The Hornets were involved twice, crushing the Mavericks, 127-103, and blowing out the Spurs, 102-84.
In the 2007 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they both won and covered easily.
In the 2006 playoffs, there were three home teams that fit this situation, and all three were small favorites like the Hornets tonight, and all three won by double digits.
In the 2005 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they won by 25 points and 21 points.
In the 2004 playoffs, there was one home team that fit this situation, and they won by 16 points.
In the 2003 playoffs, there were three more. The results? Romp, romp, and romp. "
MrBator what do you think about scalabrine arguments?
PobliegiBlisko, I posted that trend but I didn't say I was betting on New Orleans. Often times I'll post what I think is an interesting trend and people assume I'm on a certain side. I'm not on a side unless I clearly spell it out. As for this game, I can't take New Orleans despite the 17-0 ATS trend because, frankly, they make me sick. On Saturday, I literally had stonach pains in the aftermath of them blowing the cover by shriveling up when it came time to slam the door. I can't forgive that, and I won't trust them tonight. This Hornets team seems like JUST the kind of chump team that can step forward and ruin a perfectly good 17-0 trend. That, and my great respect for scalabrine's analysis, has me on the sidelines. To tell you the truth, I want to take Denver but I know my bitterness over Saturday's putrid defeat on NO -4 is clouding my thinking.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PobiegliBlisko:
scalabrine vs MrBator
scalabrine what do you think about Bator aruments: "
Last season there were six home teams in the playoffs that were favored following a game where they won SU as favorites after coming back from a double-digit deficit. These six home teams all won, winning by margins of 30,24,6,17,18, and 30 points. They went 6-0 ATS. The Hornets were involved twice, crushing the Mavericks, 127-103, and blowing out the Spurs, 102-84.
In the 2007 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they both won and covered easily.
In the 2006 playoffs, there were three home teams that fit this situation, and all three were small favorites like the Hornets tonight, and all three won by double digits.
In the 2005 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they won by 25 points and 21 points.
In the 2004 playoffs, there was one home team that fit this situation, and they won by 16 points.
In the 2003 playoffs, there were three more. The results? Romp, romp, and romp. "
MrBator what do you think about scalabrine arguments?
PobliegiBlisko, I posted that trend but I didn't say I was betting on New Orleans. Often times I'll post what I think is an interesting trend and people assume I'm on a certain side. I'm not on a side unless I clearly spell it out. As for this game, I can't take New Orleans despite the 17-0 ATS trend because, frankly, they make me sick. On Saturday, I literally had stonach pains in the aftermath of them blowing the cover by shriveling up when it came time to slam the door. I can't forgive that, and I won't trust them tonight. This Hornets team seems like JUST the kind of chump team that can step forward and ruin a perfectly good 17-0 trend. That, and my great respect for scalabrine's analysis, has me on the sidelines. To tell you the truth, I want to take Denver but I know my bitterness over Saturday's putrid defeat on NO -4 is clouding my thinking.
And another thing. On Saturday night, I bet big on the worthless Jazz thanks to another very similar trend involving home playoff teams off of comeback wins. That one failed miserably.
0
And another thing. On Saturday night, I bet big on the worthless Jazz thanks to another very similar trend involving home playoff teams off of comeback wins. That one failed miserably.
PobliegiBlisko, I posted that trend but I didn't say I was betting on New Orleans. Often times I'll post what I think is an interesting trend and people assume I'm on a certain side. I'm not on a side unless I clearly spell it out. As for this game, I can't take New Orleans despite the 17-0 ATS trend because, frankly, they make me sick. On Saturday, I literally had stonach pains in the aftermath of them blowing the cover by shriveling up when it came time to slam the door. I can't forgive that, and I won't trust them tonight. This Hornets team seems like JUST the kind of chump team that can step forward and ruin a perfectly good 17-0 trend. That, and my great respect for scalabrine's analysis, has me on the sidelines. To tell you the truth, I want to take Denver but I know my bitterness over Saturday's putrid defeat on NO -4 is clouding my thinking.
Ha. Well, I guess I figured when you were telling the guy who had DEN in a tease +10.5 that he was in trouble, that you were very high on NOR ... well, I guess I was confused.
Oh well. BOL all.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
PobliegiBlisko, I posted that trend but I didn't say I was betting on New Orleans. Often times I'll post what I think is an interesting trend and people assume I'm on a certain side. I'm not on a side unless I clearly spell it out. As for this game, I can't take New Orleans despite the 17-0 ATS trend because, frankly, they make me sick. On Saturday, I literally had stonach pains in the aftermath of them blowing the cover by shriveling up when it came time to slam the door. I can't forgive that, and I won't trust them tonight. This Hornets team seems like JUST the kind of chump team that can step forward and ruin a perfectly good 17-0 trend. That, and my great respect for scalabrine's analysis, has me on the sidelines. To tell you the truth, I want to take Denver but I know my bitterness over Saturday's putrid defeat on NO -4 is clouding my thinking.
Ha. Well, I guess I figured when you were telling the guy who had DEN in a tease +10.5 that he was in trouble, that you were very high on NOR ... well, I guess I was confused.
Ha. Well, I guess I figured when you were telling the guy who had DEN in a tease +10.5 that he was in trouble, that you were very high on NOR ... well, I guess I was confused.
Oh well. BOL all.
The trend said he was in trouble. I myself can't wait to see what happens, but I know what you mean.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mike_NYC:
Ha. Well, I guess I figured when you were telling the guy who had DEN in a tease +10.5 that he was in trouble, that you were very high on NOR ... well, I guess I was confused.
Oh well. BOL all.
The trend said he was in trouble. I myself can't wait to see what happens, but I know what you mean.
scalabrine what do you think about Bator aruments: "
Last season there were six home teams in the playoffs that were
favored following a game where they won SU as favorites after coming
back from a double-digit deficit. These six home teams all won,
winning by margins of 30,24,6,17,18, and 30 points. They went 6-0
ATS. The Hornets were involved twice, crushing the Mavericks, 127-103,
and blowing out the Spurs, 102-84.
In the 2007 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they both won and covered easily.
In the 2006 playoffs, there were three home teams that fit this
situation, and all three were small favorites like the Hornets tonight,
and all three won by double digits.
In the 2005 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they won by 25 points and 21 points.
In the 2004 playoffs, there was one home team that fit this situation, and they won by 16 points.
In the 2003 playoffs, there were three more. The results? Romp, romp, and romp. "
MrBator waht do you think about scalabrine arguments?
compelling trends from bator as expected
all i can say is this "is there a correlation between the previous events (i.e. this trend of home teams after being favored SU after coming back from a DD deficit stated by Bator) and this event (tonight's game)?"...and more importantly, does the correlation then prove causation??? we can only guess.How can it be proved that these statistics, although compelling, have ANY bearing on tonight's game.
Well, that is why i've shifted towards the 'macro-perspective' for playoff games. No more 'revenge games'. B2B's. Resting players etc. Playoff games encompass an entire season of work as well as as history, most of the time, failures in the clutch, impacting a performance. Just like last night's Rockets game.
The Hornets team in those thrends were MUCH different then the one here. It was a team that could have gone to the NBA finals last year if they could have come through in a game where MANY MANY on this site and everywhere else thought the spurs would pass the torch in game 7. It didn't happen.
That mavs team last year was floundering lost team still reeling from the 1st round dispatch the previous year to lowly Golden State. Then they ran into a cool, calm, collected, and uber talented Hornets team who dominated them. If you can't beat the GSW in the first round, how will you beat the up and coming Hornets?
Tonight is the reverse. So many unanswered questions for the Hornets. Tyson Chandler, a guy who isn't sure he should even be here, gave you of 15 pts and 18 rebounds in 81 minutes of playoff action...not the same guy...James posey had to give you 13 pts in a game they won by 2 and no one is sure if he can give much of anything tonight...even SEAN MARKS had to give 8....that's asking ALOT...you have to be guaranteed an A+ effort from Paul to win this (and then some)...and that's asking too much from a Hornets team who has a unknown/misguided? game plan from byron...ill count on Karl and the Denver D to neutralize the Hornets enough to win this...i see a close game with Denver coming out on top and that is why the spread attracted me.
to bator and thank you blisko for posting his stance
0
Quote Originally Posted by PobiegliBlisko:
scalabrine vs MrBator
scalabrine what do you think about Bator aruments: "
Last season there were six home teams in the playoffs that were
favored following a game where they won SU as favorites after coming
back from a double-digit deficit. These six home teams all won,
winning by margins of 30,24,6,17,18, and 30 points. They went 6-0
ATS. The Hornets were involved twice, crushing the Mavericks, 127-103,
and blowing out the Spurs, 102-84.
In the 2007 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they both won and covered easily.
In the 2006 playoffs, there were three home teams that fit this
situation, and all three were small favorites like the Hornets tonight,
and all three won by double digits.
In the 2005 playoffs, there were two home teams that fit this situation, and they won by 25 points and 21 points.
In the 2004 playoffs, there was one home team that fit this situation, and they won by 16 points.
In the 2003 playoffs, there were three more. The results? Romp, romp, and romp. "
MrBator waht do you think about scalabrine arguments?
compelling trends from bator as expected
all i can say is this "is there a correlation between the previous events (i.e. this trend of home teams after being favored SU after coming back from a DD deficit stated by Bator) and this event (tonight's game)?"...and more importantly, does the correlation then prove causation??? we can only guess.How can it be proved that these statistics, although compelling, have ANY bearing on tonight's game.
Well, that is why i've shifted towards the 'macro-perspective' for playoff games. No more 'revenge games'. B2B's. Resting players etc. Playoff games encompass an entire season of work as well as as history, most of the time, failures in the clutch, impacting a performance. Just like last night's Rockets game.
The Hornets team in those thrends were MUCH different then the one here. It was a team that could have gone to the NBA finals last year if they could have come through in a game where MANY MANY on this site and everywhere else thought the spurs would pass the torch in game 7. It didn't happen.
That mavs team last year was floundering lost team still reeling from the 1st round dispatch the previous year to lowly Golden State. Then they ran into a cool, calm, collected, and uber talented Hornets team who dominated them. If you can't beat the GSW in the first round, how will you beat the up and coming Hornets?
Tonight is the reverse. So many unanswered questions for the Hornets. Tyson Chandler, a guy who isn't sure he should even be here, gave you of 15 pts and 18 rebounds in 81 minutes of playoff action...not the same guy...James posey had to give you 13 pts in a game they won by 2 and no one is sure if he can give much of anything tonight...even SEAN MARKS had to give 8....that's asking ALOT...you have to be guaranteed an A+ effort from Paul to win this (and then some)...and that's asking too much from a Hornets team who has a unknown/misguided? game plan from byron...ill count on Karl and the Denver D to neutralize the Hornets enough to win this...i see a close game with Denver coming out on top and that is why the spread attracted me.
to bator and thank you blisko for posting his stance
PobliegiBlisko, I posted that trend but I didn't say I was betting on New Orleans. Often times I'll post what I think is an interesting trend and people assume I'm on a certain side. I'm not on a side unless I clearly spell it out. As for this game, I can't take New Orleans despite the 17-0 ATS trend because, frankly, they make me sick. On Saturday, I literally had stonach pains in the aftermath of them blowing the cover by shriveling up when it came time to slam the door. I can't forgive that, and I won't trust them tonight. This Hornets team seems like JUST the kind of chump team that can step forward and ruin a perfectly good 17-0 trend. That, and my great respect for scalabrine's analysis, has me on the sidelines. To tell you the truth, I want to take Denver but I know my bitterness over Saturday's putrid defeat on NO -4 is clouding my thinking.
well bator i fell into the same trap with the reading of the out-of-context post (not really blink fault)...figuring you ended your post with NO -2....enjoy the game without a wager...sometimes its better just to sit it out and ENJOY SOME GOOD basketball, something i CANNOT do when i have $$$ on these games...but there is no backing out now...Denver must give its fanbase something its lacked for way too long...and Karl, your ass is grass if you drop your pants here...it is a BIG game for Denver...much bigger than for the Hornets who have a 'forgiveness' year after almost getting to the conference finals last year...tonight Denver must follow in the footsteps of Houston...and bring this city some pride, some relevance, while everyone trips over themselves slobbering over Lebron
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
PobliegiBlisko, I posted that trend but I didn't say I was betting on New Orleans. Often times I'll post what I think is an interesting trend and people assume I'm on a certain side. I'm not on a side unless I clearly spell it out. As for this game, I can't take New Orleans despite the 17-0 ATS trend because, frankly, they make me sick. On Saturday, I literally had stonach pains in the aftermath of them blowing the cover by shriveling up when it came time to slam the door. I can't forgive that, and I won't trust them tonight. This Hornets team seems like JUST the kind of chump team that can step forward and ruin a perfectly good 17-0 trend. That, and my great respect for scalabrine's analysis, has me on the sidelines. To tell you the truth, I want to take Denver but I know my bitterness over Saturday's putrid defeat on NO -4 is clouding my thinking.
well bator i fell into the same trap with the reading of the out-of-context post (not really blink fault)...figuring you ended your post with NO -2....enjoy the game without a wager...sometimes its better just to sit it out and ENJOY SOME GOOD basketball, something i CANNOT do when i have $$$ on these games...but there is no backing out now...Denver must give its fanbase something its lacked for way too long...and Karl, your ass is grass if you drop your pants here...it is a BIG game for Denver...much bigger than for the Hornets who have a 'forgiveness' year after almost getting to the conference finals last year...tonight Denver must follow in the footsteps of Houston...and bring this city some pride, some relevance, while everyone trips over themselves slobbering over Lebron
I am loving the PASSION! Let's get this money tonight bro! Nuggets ML +110!
only reason i'm on the 2 is because of Ben Gordon...Pierce's three point play at the end saved me a BUNDLE +3...oh yeah and bodog has no ML for this...surprised...nope, im not on matchbook yet...someday...would have a little trouble shifting the bankroll over (i.e. 3 weeks for a check)
0
Quote Originally Posted by L8kersFan74:
I am loving the PASSION! Let's get this money tonight bro! Nuggets ML +110!
only reason i'm on the 2 is because of Ben Gordon...Pierce's three point play at the end saved me a BUNDLE +3...oh yeah and bodog has no ML for this...surprised...nope, im not on matchbook yet...someday...would have a little trouble shifting the bankroll over (i.e. 3 weeks for a check)
everyone and there grandma likes denver. thats worrysome
some of my biggest wins have come after NOT logging onto covers and seeing what the forum was on...and then finding out everyone pounded the same team...no worries
0
Quote Originally Posted by luckydoc:
everyone and there grandma likes denver. thats worrysome
some of my biggest wins have come after NOT logging onto covers and seeing what the forum was on...and then finding out everyone pounded the same team...no worries
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
...........thanks for reminding me about Houston game 2........Rudy
.....but I'm w/ you tonight........feeling this 1....Denver the better team....................let's get em...............gl
Hot Forum Topics
