Posted:
#51
New Orleans tonight to beat the Kings
If you are betting the Kings or even considering it, sign out of covers and don't log in again.
Posted:
#53
Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Cats:
Quote Originally Posted by JimmyGape: I support my teams. Weve won a lot of championships but its sports. All dynasties come to an end. Niners should literally be 9-0 in super bowls. How should they be 9-0 in Super Bowls when they've only been to 8 Super Bowls? (Sorry, I had the gall to login again after betting the Kings on the moneyline)
Quote Originally Posted by JimmyGape: I support my teams. Weve won a lot of championships but its sports. All dynasties come to an end. Niners should literally be 9-0 in super bowls. How should they be 9-0 in Super Bowls when they've only been to 8 Super Bowls? (Sorry, I had the gall to login again after betting the Kings on the moneyline)
Theres several NFC CHampionship games that they could have and should have won as well, lets say one out of all those goes there way. They would have romped the AFC Oppponent in those seasons. And the 3 SB losses all could have easily gone the other way.
Yes i have been known to support my teams. Its not that I don't believe what I am saying at all, I truly belueve the Warriors are far better than the KIngs and the truth is they are. Kerr may have to go.
Posted:
#55
Quote Originally Posted by JimmyGape:
One team has won 4 championships and has 5 hall of famers, most of them still or within their prime. Warriors
One team has won 4 championships and has 5 hall of famers, most of them still or within their prime. Warriors
27-12their last 38 games and have flipped that switch. Dubs to the bank
just saw this threas for the first time, gave me a good laugh with some of the responses from guys playing the other side, i saw someone say the amount of HOF's on the dubs jimmy counted was wrong, but what stood out to me immidiately was the bad math in the very 1st post. "warriors 27-12 last 38 games" ...
27+12=39
39-12=27
did it both ways to double check my math and sure enough it turns out 27-12 record comes out to 39 games no matter how you slice it.
Posted:
#56
@JimmyGape
Nobody would mind if you were just supporting your teams. But you're always such an A-hole about it and your posts are really classless, crass and full of hyperbole. Which makes it really satisfying to rub your face in it when you are wrong.
Now you're talking shoulda woulda coulda. The Kings had the lead for the entire game except the first 3 mins of the first quarter, but you were not only so convinced you had to start yet another obnoxiously titled thread for attention, as is typical of people with low intelligence you won't even admit you were wrong when presented with evidence proving such. You still think the Dubs are better and now it's all Steve Kerr's fault... The only guy to deliver a chip to the bay area in recent memory.
Hot Forum Topics
