Posted:
#151
wow 
0
I will put this WRITE-UP up against any Covers.com Expert right here, right now!!! Knicks@Grizzlies
Posted:
#154
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
you're long winded. Yup, you hit all the relevant points profiling the Knicks.
Anything else?
I think the knicks get smoked.
I think they will give up a lot of fouls and put the Grizzlies on the line.
I think they will give up a lot of fouls and put the Grizzlies on the line.
| team = Knicks and rest > 4 and A and D | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
https://sportsdatabase.com/nba/query?
sdql=team%3DKnicks+and+rest%3E4+and+A+and+D&submit=S+D+Q+L+%21
| team = Grizzlies and H and rest > 4 and F | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
https://sportsdatabase.com/nba/query?
sdql=team%3DGrizzlies+and+H+and+rest%3E4+and+F&submit=S+D+Q+L+%21
I think you'll be coming back down to the .500 mark, like you have every season, in every sport you cap, which means at -110, you don't break even.
of course you'll dispute this, despite all of your posts on covers being searchable for anyone wanting to check my assertion.
but mostly. I get tired of the self-serving nature of your threads.
0
Posted:
#156
Quote Originally Posted by henrymethbreath:
you're long winded.
you're long winded.
I think the knicks get smoked.
I think they will give up a lot of fouls and put the Grizzlies on the line.
I think they will give up a lot of fouls and put the Grizzlies on the line.
| team = Knicks and rest > 4 and A and D | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
https://sportsdatabase.com/nba/query?
sdql=team%3DKnicks+and+rest%3E4+and+A+and+D&submit=S+D+Q+L+%21
| team = Grizzlies and H and rest > 4 and F | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
https://sportsdatabase.com/nba/query?
sdql=team%3DGrizzlies+and+H+and+rest%3E4+and+F&submit=S+D+Q+L+%21
I think you'll be coming back down to the .500 mark, like you have every season, in every sport you cap, which means at -110, you don't break even.
of course you'll dispute this, despite all of your posts on covers being searchable for anyone wanting to check my assertion.
but mostly. I get tired of the self-serving nature of your threads.
You've said the same thing in 10 of my threads this year and have been wrong 80% of the time and that includes ML hits which reverse the juice heavily in the bettor's favor.
I'll let the posters decide who is right here given that.
0
Posted:
#160
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
no. the only other thread I said you were wrong where I was wrong is the Yankees game in September. You've said the same thing in 10 of my threads this year and have been wrong 80% of the time and that includes ML hits which reverse the juice heavily in the bettor's favor.
I'll let the posters decide who is right here given that.
0
Posted:
#161
since 2013 baseball season, I threw a popcorn in your threads as a personal bookmark for myself, strictly based on your writing style.
I will say your success in basketball may have made up for your baseball and football picks. Not too sure, though.
good capping thus far in basketball, scal. I'm more than willing to give when credit is due.
0
Posted:
#163
Quote Originally Posted by henrymethbreath:
no. the only other thread I said you were wrong where I was wrong is the Yankees game in September.
and interestingly, that was a top of the 8th comeback for 4 runs on Steve Delabar.no. the only other thread I said you were wrong where I was wrong is the Yankees game in September.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/TOR/TOR201309180.shtml
hardly a well-capped game. You got very lucky against one of the better relievers in the game.
anyway. keep up the good work.
just wanted to let you know, since you asked if I had anything else to say, that I think here's another case where I think you are wrong. First time I've done it all baskeball season.
0
Posted:
#164
Scal: I don't know why people would argue with you. You've more than outlined your position. My lean is Memphis since Gasol is going to play. James Johnson has been John Hollinger's greatest find so far. Plus trading Bayless for Courtney Lee . But your passion and attention to detail wards me off. I'm on phoenix beating the rudderless nuggets. They have no point guard against a super talented point guard. They're playing for pride. Phoenix is playing for the playoffs in one of the best unsung stories since the Baron Davis led Warriors upset the Mavs as an eighth seed. Best of luck.
0
Posted:
#166
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
Henry you are just sounding spineless now
lolque?Henry you are just sounding spineless now
Because I'm not in lockstep with scal, and I post an opposing opinion, I am spineless?
There is rarely an opposing viewpoint in scal's write-ups. It's one person after the next proclaiming his glory. I get that, he's been killing.
Tonight, I think he's wrong. So I posted as such.
He asked me what I thought. I think he's wrong.
Is this the internet?
All of the folks tailing scal best of luck to you.
All of the folks tailing scal best of luck to you.
0
Ok
Posted:
#169
Quote Originally Posted by henrymethbreath:
since 2013 baseball season, I threw a popcorn in your threads as a personal bookmark for myself, strictly based on your writing style.
since 2013 baseball season, I threw a popcorn in your threads as a personal bookmark for myself, strictly based on your writing style.
I will say your success in basketball may have made up for your baseball and football picks. Not too sure, though.
good capping thus far in basketball, scal. I'm more than willing to give when credit is due.
I've capped about 2 baseball games in 3 years and may never do it again.
Ask the other members how they like my NFL picks that I have to 'make up for.'
0
Posted:
#170
Quote Originally Posted by stevenp:
Scal: I don't know why people would argue with you. You've more than outlined your position. My lean is Memphis since Gasol is going to play. James Johnson has been John Hollinger's greatest find so far. Plus trading Bayless for Courtney Lee . But your passion and attention to detail wards me off. I'm on phoenix beating the rudderless nuggets. They have no point guard against a super talented point guard. They're playing for pride. Phoenix is playing for the playoffs in one of the best unsung stories since the Baron Davis led Warriors upset the Mavs as an eighth seed. Best of luck.
Scal: I don't know why people would argue with you. You've more than outlined your position. My lean is Memphis since Gasol is going to play. James Johnson has been John Hollinger's greatest find so far. Plus trading Bayless for Courtney Lee . But your passion and attention to detail wards me off. I'm on phoenix beating the rudderless nuggets. They have no point guard against a super talented point guard. They're playing for pride. Phoenix is playing for the playoffs in one of the best unsung stories since the Baron Davis led Warriors upset the Mavs as an eighth seed. Best of luck.
What the suns are doing blows my mind. I haven't bet against them since game one. I won't let that team burn me again.
0
Posted:
#172
I'm saying you're spineless because you come in with non-statistical rubbish using terms like long winded and self serving - show me a thread that isn't self serving! Plainly opposing scal which is fine even if you had no actual arguments. But then you get all buddy buddy with the cheers signs and all. Looks like a major climb down. Hence spineless
0
Posted:
#173
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101761072
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101709251
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101794414&page=4
I don't have time for this.
good job capping basketball, scal.
0
Hot Forum Topics
