Wow tough to lose both again today plus I lost +20.5 live bet for 2 units But won the +27 live bet for 3 units overall lost 3 units with the mavs +7 for 2 and mavs/spurs under 197.5 for 2. Looking forward to a better day tomorrow lc you are overdue only 8-12 in your last 20 still sticking with you though we got this.
0
Wow tough to lose both again today plus I lost +20.5 live bet for 2 units But won the +27 live bet for 3 units overall lost 3 units with the mavs +7 for 2 and mavs/spurs under 197.5 for 2. Looking forward to a better day tomorrow lc you are overdue only 8-12 in your last 20 still sticking with you though we got this.
Of course spurs all of a sudden decide to show up . Smh
You're a good man and a good handicapper LeagueCapper. But you always should check what really serious cappers have to say as well.
Quote Mavin:
The inevitable moment has come with Vegas cashing big on prolonged series in the first round of NBA playoffs. Never before we had in the first round so many game 7's as this postseason. “Naturally” the teams - that know each other so well - put up a big “resistance” to each other and now it is a real good Spot for us to be cashing on what is and was inevitable weak spot for Vegas. As i see it – the Spurs and the Thunder are two teams their ML can be parlayed for multiple units with a very high probability they both hit. I will also parlay their ATS as I feel that in Game Seven for both all the previous “mishaps” will be long gone and forgotten and we will see the real abilities. At least from the opening of the game especially in the first Halves. Indian Pacers and LA Clippers are a very good Spot plays too although not as good as OKC and the Spurs. I will also add one unit parlay with all 4 teams – the Clippers, the Pacers, the Spurs and the Thunder. Although the line for 3 out 4 are already out – I will wait on the line for SA-Mavs game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:
Of course spurs all of a sudden decide to show up . Smh
You're a good man and a good handicapper LeagueCapper. But you always should check what really serious cappers have to say as well.
Quote Mavin:
The inevitable moment has come with Vegas cashing big on prolonged series in the first round of NBA playoffs. Never before we had in the first round so many game 7's as this postseason. “Naturally” the teams - that know each other so well - put up a big “resistance” to each other and now it is a real good Spot for us to be cashing on what is and was inevitable weak spot for Vegas. As i see it – the Spurs and the Thunder are two teams their ML can be parlayed for multiple units with a very high probability they both hit. I will also parlay their ATS as I feel that in Game Seven for both all the previous “mishaps” will be long gone and forgotten and we will see the real abilities. At least from the opening of the game especially in the first Halves. Indian Pacers and LA Clippers are a very good Spot plays too although not as good as OKC and the Spurs. I will also add one unit parlay with all 4 teams – the Clippers, the Pacers, the Spurs and the Thunder. Although the line for 3 out 4 are already out – I will wait on the line for SA-Mavs game.
You're a good man and a good handicapper LeagueCapper. But you always should check what really serious cappers have to say as well.
Quote Mavin:
The inevitable moment has come with Vegas cashing big on prolonged series in the first round of NBA playoffs. Never before we had in the first round so many game 7's as this postseason. “Naturally” the teams - that know each other so well - put up a big “resistance” to each other and now it is a real good Spot for us to be cashing on what is and was inevitable weak spot for Vegas. As i see it – the Spurs and the Thunder are two teams their ML can be parlayed for multiple units with a very high probability they both hit. I will also parlay their ATS as I feel that in Game Seven for both all the previous “mishaps” will be long gone and forgotten and we will see the real abilities. At least from the opening of the game especially in the first Halves. Indian Pacers and LA Clippers are a very good Spot plays too although not as good as OKC and the Spurs. I will also add one unit parlay with all 4 teams – the Clippers, the Pacers, the Spurs and the Thunder. Although the line for 3 out 4 are already out – I will wait on the line for SA-Mavs game.
Who's Marvin and how can I locate him?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mr_Coffee_Shop:
You're a good man and a good handicapper LeagueCapper. But you always should check what really serious cappers have to say as well.
Quote Mavin:
The inevitable moment has come with Vegas cashing big on prolonged series in the first round of NBA playoffs. Never before we had in the first round so many game 7's as this postseason. “Naturally” the teams - that know each other so well - put up a big “resistance” to each other and now it is a real good Spot for us to be cashing on what is and was inevitable weak spot for Vegas. As i see it – the Spurs and the Thunder are two teams their ML can be parlayed for multiple units with a very high probability they both hit. I will also parlay their ATS as I feel that in Game Seven for both all the previous “mishaps” will be long gone and forgotten and we will see the real abilities. At least from the opening of the game especially in the first Halves. Indian Pacers and LA Clippers are a very good Spot plays too although not as good as OKC and the Spurs. I will also add one unit parlay with all 4 teams – the Clippers, the Pacers, the Spurs and the Thunder. Although the line for 3 out 4 are already out – I will wait on the line for SA-Mavs game.
He played 4 very heavy public favorites (OKC, Spurs, Clips, Pacers), went 3-1 with a loss on the Clippers spread and gave back some extra in the parlay with the Clips involved.
I don't even know the guy or poster. Just saying in not impressed with the guy (again, these were 4 big favorites at home so when he says ML parlay for Spurs and Thunder...please...would it even pay .9 to 1? No way.)
0
Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:
Should we not have tailed Marvin?
Not really.
I don't see him offering more than LC does.
He played 4 very heavy public favorites (OKC, Spurs, Clips, Pacers), went 3-1 with a loss on the Clippers spread and gave back some extra in the parlay with the Clips involved.
I don't even know the guy or poster. Just saying in not impressed with the guy (again, these were 4 big favorites at home so when he says ML parlay for Spurs and Thunder...please...would it even pay .9 to 1? No way.)
He played 4 very heavy public favorites (OKC, Spurs, Clips, Pacers), went 3-1 with a loss on the Clippers spread and gave back some extra in the parlay with the Clips involved.
I don't even know the guy or poster. Just saying in not impressed with the guy (again, these were 4 big favorites at home so when he says ML parlay for Spurs and Thunder...please...would it even pay .9 to 1? No way.)
Yet the info in his statement could be considered valuable
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Not really.
I don't see him offering more than LC does.
He played 4 very heavy public favorites (OKC, Spurs, Clips, Pacers), went 3-1 with a loss on the Clippers spread and gave back some extra in the parlay with the Clips involved.
I don't even know the guy or poster. Just saying in not impressed with the guy (again, these were 4 big favorites at home so when he says ML parlay for Spurs and Thunder...please...would it even pay .9 to 1? No way.)
Yet the info in his statement could be considered valuable
Yet the info in his statement could be considered valuable
That depends. He chose 4 heavy public favorites.
This is exactly what Steve Stevens does on the show Money Talks as a tout.
I'd have to see what he chose over 10 or 20 picks to get a better feel. But overall, he doesn't seem to be offering anything that is distinctly original.
0
Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:
Yet the info in his statement could be considered valuable
That depends. He chose 4 heavy public favorites.
This is exactly what Steve Stevens does on the show Money Talks as a tout.
I'd have to see what he chose over 10 or 20 picks to get a better feel. But overall, he doesn't seem to be offering anything that is distinctly original.
Mavin took the favorites only for the game 7. He went 14-4 in playoffs winning all away games like Memphis in OKC ML (!!!) etc. That is Sportsmavin youre talking about not some new capper. He had an Over 1.6 million viewed thread here before he got banned
White...... can you verify who Marvin is. I'm interested in making money.
0
Quote Originally Posted by whitewedding:
Mavin took the favorites only for the game 7. He went 14-4 in playoffs winning all away games like Memphis in OKC ML (!!!) etc. That is Sportsmavin youre talking about not some new capper. He had an Over 1.6 million viewed thread here before he got banned
White...... can you verify who Marvin is. I'm interested in making money.
As long as I remember you scalabrini - you were a scambag and stayed a scambag. You know Mavin is thousand times better capper than you and you, CMJihnson, kaponofor and all the wanna be's used to bite your elbows being jealous and now youre pretending you dont even know who he is? Youre a SCAMBAG
Didn't know he had a fan club or even who he is.
Going 3-1 in 4 is not impressive because you could just as easily go 2-2 or 1-3.
He didn't say anything in the 'write-up'. That's all.
So I was just telling best-bets that. It's a lazy cap in my opion.
"Take the spurs" (groundbreaking taking a 62 win team with no explanation).
Ok why.
"Because I feel good about it."
LOL. Well thanks for the 'feeling'. I'll pass on your picks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by whitewedding:
As long as I remember you scalabrini - you were a scambag and stayed a scambag. You know Mavin is thousand times better capper than you and you, CMJihnson, kaponofor and all the wanna be's used to bite your elbows being jealous and now youre pretending you dont even know who he is? Youre a SCAMBAG
Didn't know he had a fan club or even who he is.
Going 3-1 in 4 is not impressive because you could just as easily go 2-2 or 1-3.
He didn't say anything in the 'write-up'. That's all.
So I was just telling best-bets that. It's a lazy cap in my opion.
"Take the spurs" (groundbreaking taking a 62 win team with no explanation).
Ok why.
"Because I feel good about it."
LOL. Well thanks for the 'feeling'. I'll pass on your picks.