Posted my plays and saw you did to. My leans are the same as yours as of now. Good luck! Whats your thoughts on Heat over? I think i'm going to ride Heat overs and maybe Team Total for awhile. This team is no longer a half court based team, and I think the Celtics are a changed team this year who can play somewhat fast. I was not impressed by the Celtics in their Knicks game defensively, and I think LeBron and D.Wade will have their way. Is Pierce playing tomorrow?
Total is rather tricky. I think the line will somewhere be 180ish and honestly it could go either way. We share the same observation with the Celtics that's why I'm kind of on the fence with playing totals in their games. I still see them as the defensive team they were. I believe Pierce will be out for a game or two but I'd love to see him suit up against the Heat.
Wade and Bronbron will most likely get their 20 points tomorrow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by patsfan33:
Posted my plays and saw you did to. My leans are the same as yours as of now. Good luck! Whats your thoughts on Heat over? I think i'm going to ride Heat overs and maybe Team Total for awhile. This team is no longer a half court based team, and I think the Celtics are a changed team this year who can play somewhat fast. I was not impressed by the Celtics in their Knicks game defensively, and I think LeBron and D.Wade will have their way. Is Pierce playing tomorrow?
Total is rather tricky. I think the line will somewhere be 180ish and honestly it could go either way. We share the same observation with the Celtics that's why I'm kind of on the fence with playing totals in their games. I still see them as the defensive team they were. I believe Pierce will be out for a game or two but I'd love to see him suit up against the Heat.
Wade and Bronbron will most likely get their 20 points tomorrow.
don't you think the Lakers will cover? i don't think Kobe will let his team start 0-3.
Another tricky game. Like I said, Kobe has been carrying the offense and he already logged 75 minutes and he isn't even 100% healthy. I get this feeling we'll see a close game where the points will come in handy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mcao:
don't you think the Lakers will cover? i don't think Kobe will let his team start 0-3.
Another tricky game. Like I said, Kobe has been carrying the offense and he already logged 75 minutes and he isn't even 100% healthy. I get this feeling we'll see a close game where the points will come in handy.
Took the Wolves @ +6 as well. I'm from Northern Wisconsin so I was able to watch both games, switching back and forth. Your write-up makes me feel more confident and I see this line dropping to +5, +4.5 by game time. Good Luck and thanks for your insight!!
It will probably dip but not too much. The line do move a lot during the preseason but then there were an awful lot of changes prior to game time (and it's the preseason).
Goodluck to the both of us!
0
Quote Originally Posted by ChizzyD:
Took the Wolves @ +6 as well. I'm from Northern Wisconsin so I was able to watch both games, switching back and forth. Your write-up makes me feel more confident and I see this line dropping to +5, +4.5 by game time. Good Luck and thanks for your insight!!
It will probably dip but not too much. The line do move a lot during the preseason but then there were an awful lot of changes prior to game time (and it's the preseason).
Their bench looks like this. This is the Hawks 2nd Unit.
PG-Jannero Pargo SG-Tracy McGrady SF-Jerry Stackhouse PF-Ivan Johnson C-Zaza Pachulia
Nets 2nd Unit
PG-Jordan Farmar SG-Stevenson and Brooks SF-Shawne Williams PF-Sheldon Williams C-Mehmet Okur
You tell me which bench you rather have? Hawks
may be the better starting 5, but the Hawks have a game the next night
and won't be able to play the starters a ton of minutes.
Pargo might even start. Anyway, just to answer your question, I'd rather have the Nets' bench but that's all they have. Their starters isn't even half of what the Hawk's V is capable of. Nets will obviously have a lot of advantage on the 1 and/or 2 spot but they will be dominated in the post.
Hawks will have a field day when teams allow them to slow down and play half court. I see the starters logging heavy minutes here and not really looking forward to the next game since they'll most likely underestimate Washington (and they'll play them at home which is a bonus since Wizards suck twice as much on the road).
0
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:
Wrote this in its41 thread.
Hawks will be a shell of themselves.
Their bench looks like this. This is the Hawks 2nd Unit.
PG-Jannero Pargo SG-Tracy McGrady SF-Jerry Stackhouse PF-Ivan Johnson C-Zaza Pachulia
Nets 2nd Unit
PG-Jordan Farmar SG-Stevenson and Brooks SF-Shawne Williams PF-Sheldon Williams C-Mehmet Okur
You tell me which bench you rather have? Hawks
may be the better starting 5, but the Hawks have a game the next night
and won't be able to play the starters a ton of minutes.
Pargo might even start. Anyway, just to answer your question, I'd rather have the Nets' bench but that's all they have. Their starters isn't even half of what the Hawk's V is capable of. Nets will obviously have a lot of advantage on the 1 and/or 2 spot but they will be dominated in the post.
Hawks will have a field day when teams allow them to slow down and play half court. I see the starters logging heavy minutes here and not really looking forward to the next game since they'll most likely underestimate Washington (and they'll play them at home which is a bonus since Wizards suck twice as much on the road).
Pargo might even start. Anyway, just to answer your question, I'd rather have the Nets' bench but that's all they have. Their starters isn't even half of what the Hawk's V is capable of. Nets will obviously have a lot of advantage on the 1 and/or 2 spot but they will be dominated in the post.
Hawks will have a field day when teams allow them to slow down and play half court. I see the starters logging heavy minutes here and not really looking forward to the next game since they'll most likely underestimate Washington (and they'll play them at home which is a bonus since Wizards suck twice as much on the road).
Wizards beat the Hawks last time they played by 32. Think the Hawks may want to avenge that loss. Teams don't forget games like that. Deron Williams will control the entire game. Good luck brother.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CrazyMilkMan:
Pargo might even start. Anyway, just to answer your question, I'd rather have the Nets' bench but that's all they have. Their starters isn't even half of what the Hawk's V is capable of. Nets will obviously have a lot of advantage on the 1 and/or 2 spot but they will be dominated in the post.
Hawks will have a field day when teams allow them to slow down and play half court. I see the starters logging heavy minutes here and not really looking forward to the next game since they'll most likely underestimate Washington (and they'll play them at home which is a bonus since Wizards suck twice as much on the road).
Wizards beat the Hawks last time they played by 32. Think the Hawks may want to avenge that loss. Teams don't forget games like that. Deron Williams will control the entire game. Good luck brother.
Wizards beat the Hawks last time they played by 32. Think the Hawks may want to avenge that loss. Teams don't forget games like that. Deron Williams will control the entire game. Good luck brother.
Goodluck Shango. Hoping that the Nets will somehow be tired after last night.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:
Wizards beat the Hawks last time they played by 32. Think the Hawks may want to avenge that loss. Teams don't forget games like that. Deron Williams will control the entire game. Good luck brother.
Goodluck Shango. Hoping that the Nets will somehow be tired after last night.
I was waiting for this UTAH game ever since the season started.
This is definitely the day and the year to fade the Lakers. With the travel time involved as well, the Lakers at home won't be able to this "easy" team on being this is their 3rd game in a row.
Utah+4.5
0
I was waiting for this UTAH game ever since the season started.
This is definitely the day and the year to fade the Lakers. With the travel time involved as well, the Lakers at home won't be able to this "easy" team on being this is their 3rd game in a row.
Hey Milk, I'm actually torn in between the Jazz and the Lakers. I know they have the will but fatigue is a big factor. Also, since this is Utah's first game, I'm sure they prepared for this. Can Kobe and the guys pull this off?
For Sac, I'm also not so sure about their game. Was it more of a hype for them or are they that good?
0
Hey Milk, I'm actually torn in between the Jazz and the Lakers. I know they have the will but fatigue is a big factor. Also, since this is Utah's first game, I'm sure they prepared for this. Can Kobe and the guys pull this off?
For Sac, I'm also not so sure about their game. Was it more of a hype for them or are they that good?
hey milk.. ever wonder why the line in the sacpor game is as high as 8? i think theres something fishy with that one...
Nothing wrong with it really. The line was based from last season (as most other would) and so they came up with 8. I do feel it's a bit high like a point and a half and so I expect it to dip to as much as 6.5 by game time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by gwapogi22:
hey milk.. ever wonder why the line in the sacpor game is as high as 8? i think theres something fishy with that one...
Nothing wrong with it really. The line was based from last season (as most other would) and so they came up with 8. I do feel it's a bit high like a point and a half and so I expect it to dip to as much as 6.5 by game time.
if the lakers are tired and the jazz havent played yet. Wouldnt the under be the better play?
Yes but I'm staying away from the totals for a bit (haven't won any total bet so far). Like I said, both teams should score around 85-90 a piece and seeing a 196.5 total I think they go UNDER.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LT56MVP:
if the lakers are tired and the jazz havent played yet. Wouldnt the under be the better play?
Yes but I'm staying away from the totals for a bit (haven't won any total bet so far). Like I said, both teams should score around 85-90 a piece and seeing a 196.5 total I think they go UNDER.
Hey Milk, I'm actually torn in between the Jazz and the Lakers. I know they have the will but fatigue is a big factor. Also, since this is Utah's first game, I'm sure they prepared for this. Can Kobe and the guys pull this off?
For Sac, I'm also not so sure about their game. Was it more of a hype for them or are they that good?
Yes, I think Lakers could still pull it off. They are playing better defense in some stretches in their last few games but have fell short because they can't get any offense from the other guys. Again, Kobe obviously took on the season knowing that he'll have to shoulder the scoring for LA. Utah is still in that rebuilding phase and teams like that is a hit-or-miss type of thing. Either they play really well or flat out suck, for our bet I do hope they play well.
Sacramento is decent. Tyreke was never healthy last season and so he wasn't able to follow up his strong rookie campaign. Give them a year or two more to sort their roster issues and get each player to learn their roles and you get your new OKC team.
0
Quote Originally Posted by antondp:
Hey Milk, I'm actually torn in between the Jazz and the Lakers. I know they have the will but fatigue is a big factor. Also, since this is Utah's first game, I'm sure they prepared for this. Can Kobe and the guys pull this off?
For Sac, I'm also not so sure about their game. Was it more of a hype for them or are they that good?
Yes, I think Lakers could still pull it off. They are playing better defense in some stretches in their last few games but have fell short because they can't get any offense from the other guys. Again, Kobe obviously took on the season knowing that he'll have to shoulder the scoring for LA. Utah is still in that rebuilding phase and teams like that is a hit-or-miss type of thing. Either they play really well or flat out suck, for our bet I do hope they play well.
Sacramento is decent. Tyreke was never healthy last season and so he wasn't able to follow up his strong rookie campaign. Give them a year or two more to sort their roster issues and get each player to learn their roles and you get your new OKC team.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.