I see the Nationals with Strasburg have opened -230 versus Nolasco and the Marlins Monday.
Let's say both the Nationals and Strasburg are as good as advertised. If so, and he makes the maximum number of starts in a season that is about 32 starts.
At -230 he and the Nationals would have to go 23-9 in those starts before you even begin to make a profit. Pretty steep really. Maybe they should win 72% of all games versus a combination like the Marlins and Nolasco, but even if they do, the profit is only 3% of the cumulative risk you took.
Nasty numbers.
BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I see the Nationals with Strasburg have opened -230 versus Nolasco and the Marlins Monday.
Let's say both the Nationals and Strasburg are as good as advertised. If so, and he makes the maximum number of starts in a season that is about 32 starts.
At -230 he and the Nationals would have to go 23-9 in those starts before you even begin to make a profit. Pretty steep really. Maybe they should win 72% of all games versus a combination like the Marlins and Nolasco, but even if they do, the profit is only 3% of the cumulative risk you took.
I'm not huge into taking run lines(maybe 1.5 out of every 10 plays I will take a team -1.5), but if the price is right, you love the spot, and ALWAYS at home, RL is the only way to go IMO when you are talking favorites that big(shiit, I don't like going over -130 in MLB let alone -230). But Straus on the mound at home against a decent club laying -180 or so, I don't mind taking them -1.5 EV. If they win 3-2, so be it. What I don't get is people taking teams +1.5. What is the point of losing all that value(I'm making an assumption that it is usually a significant dog people would go +1.5) to back yourself up for a 1 run loss? If anyone has a decent hypothesis on ANY situation to take a +1.5 wager, please fire away.
I'm chomping at the bit for MLB!!! After a football season where I had my first losing season since 2007(and not just losing; I was absolutely MANHANDLED with my bankroll wiped out by Columbus Day), I need to get back on my bike and get back to business!
0
I agree, Key.
I'm not huge into taking run lines(maybe 1.5 out of every 10 plays I will take a team -1.5), but if the price is right, you love the spot, and ALWAYS at home, RL is the only way to go IMO when you are talking favorites that big(shiit, I don't like going over -130 in MLB let alone -230). But Straus on the mound at home against a decent club laying -180 or so, I don't mind taking them -1.5 EV. If they win 3-2, so be it. What I don't get is people taking teams +1.5. What is the point of losing all that value(I'm making an assumption that it is usually a significant dog people would go +1.5) to back yourself up for a 1 run loss? If anyone has a decent hypothesis on ANY situation to take a +1.5 wager, please fire away.
I'm chomping at the bit for MLB!!! After a football season where I had my first losing season since 2007(and not just losing; I was absolutely MANHANDLED with my bankroll wiped out by Columbus Day), I need to get back on my bike and get back to business!
One of my most successful strategies is ML parlays on ace starters at home. Strasburg on Monday certainly fits this. Nolasco is tough and there is no value at -230 straight up. Like stevo1 I'm already eyeing the under. GL this season to all.
0
One of my most successful strategies is ML parlays on ace starters at home. Strasburg on Monday certainly fits this. Nolasco is tough and there is no value at -230 straight up. Like stevo1 I'm already eyeing the under. GL this season to all.
I am with Steve and volcanic, parlay is the way to go when they get -200 or higher. I will parlay Texas tonight ml and Strasbourg tomorrow. Texas wins I will hedge against Strasbourg at +220 to come out positive.
0
I am with Steve and volcanic, parlay is the way to go when they get -200 or higher. I will parlay Texas tonight ml and Strasbourg tomorrow. Texas wins I will hedge against Strasbourg at +220 to come out positive.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.