Posted:
#51
local*
SJP's *MLB Roundtable* (FRIDAY---July 15th, 2011)
Posted:
#55
My leans so far...
Texas @ Mariners ... Under
SF @ SD ... Under
LAA @ Oak ... Under
(All of the above are tails of systematrix's system picks, plus they are based on Happy Kane's mojo system.)
Detroit RL (backing Verlander)
Yanks RL (fading Morrow)
Reds RL (backing Cueto; fading Westbrook)
Braves RL (backing Hudson; fading L Hernandez)
Brewers @ Rockies ... Over (live bats on both teams; poor pitcher mojo on both teams)
Texas @ Mariners ... Under
SF @ SD ... Under
LAA @ Oak ... Under
(All of the above are tails of systematrix's system picks, plus they are based on Happy Kane's mojo system.)
Detroit RL (backing Verlander)
Yanks RL (fading Morrow)
Reds RL (backing Cueto; fading Westbrook)
Braves RL (backing Hudson; fading L Hernandez)
Brewers @ Rockies ... Over (live bats on both teams; poor pitcher mojo on both teams)
Posted:
#57
sarah---padres kill my parlay last night, so i can feel your pain.i didn t post so i will leave it at that. i m not going near the cubs i don t trust them as far as i can spit. i will be on these 4 tonight
pitts, angles, indians and philly one unit on each and one unit on all 4 in a parlay. may the good side of luck be with us all.-------i like your latest write up, but i was disappointed that you don t like porn but i guess thats the female side of ya. have a nice day.
GOOD LUCK SARAH
Posted:
#66
Quote Originally Posted by GIMMETHEPOINTS:
I should have said normally in day games she loves to fade the public...is that sort of true?
I should have said normally in day games she loves to fade the public...is that sort of true?
You'll find me on the opposite end of line movements unless I can find good reasons to justify the action on one side for the most part.
Someone asked me if I just watch the line move and then play the opposite side, and if that were the case, I wouldn't have played the Rangers or Indians last night. I don't think it's profitable to just play against line movements (where the action is). There has to be more to the puzzle than that.
Nolasco isn't very good during the day, Dempster is a good bounce back pitcher for the Cubs. That's more or less the angle I'm looking at, and my expectation today is that everyone will love the Marlins due to the winning streak and the Cubs implosion last night. Bettors usually only remember the previous day.
The Marlins are playing well, but they were also behind 2-0 last night to Matt Garza before Marmol walked in runs for them in the 9th.
Posted:
#67
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:
That's not entirely true. I like to pick my spots.
I had Indians & Rangers last night which were "public" plays.
That's not entirely true. I like to pick my spots.
I had Indians & Rangers last night which were "public" plays.
its hilarious how strong you were pushing the orioles until game time
gl today i stayed away from sf under no way im touching something the entire globe is on i alrdy learned my lesson plenty of times i had sf +1.5 for a reason instead of straight up; no sweat the whole time! 
Posted:
#68
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:
You'll find me on the opposite end of line movements unless I can find good reasons to justify the action on one side for the most part.
Someone asked me if I just watch the line move and then play the opposite side, and if that were the case, I wouldn't have played the Rangers or Indians last night. I don't think it's profitable to just play against line movements (where the action is). There has to be more to the puzzle than that.
Nolasco isn't very good during the day, Dempster is a good bounce back pitcher for the Cubs. That's more or less the angle I'm looking at, and my expectation today is that everyone will love the Marlins due to the winning streak and the Cubs implosion last night. Bettors usually only remember the previous day.
The Marlins are playing well, but they were also behind 2-0 last night to Matt Garza before Marmol walked in runs for them in the 9th.
You'll find me on the opposite end of line movements unless I can find good reasons to justify the action on one side for the most part.
Someone asked me if I just watch the line move and then play the opposite side, and if that were the case, I wouldn't have played the Rangers or Indians last night. I don't think it's profitable to just play against line movements (where the action is). There has to be more to the puzzle than that.
Nolasco isn't very good during the day, Dempster is a good bounce back pitcher for the Cubs. That's more or less the angle I'm looking at, and my expectation today is that everyone will love the Marlins due to the winning streak and the Cubs implosion last night. Bettors usually only remember the previous day.
The Marlins are playing well, but they were also behind 2-0 last night to Matt Garza before Marmol walked in runs for them in the 9th.
True that, thank you Marmol
Posted:
#69
Quote Originally Posted by The_True:
its hilarious how strong you were pushing the orioles until game timegl today i stayed away from sf under no way im touching something the entire globe is on i alrdy learned my lesson plenty of times i had sf +1.5 for a reason instead of straight up; no sweat the whole time!
its hilarious how strong you were pushing the orioles until game time
gl today i stayed away from sf under no way im touching something the entire globe is on i alrdy learned my lesson plenty of times i had sf +1.5 for a reason instead of straight up; no sweat the whole time! I don't "push" anything. A lean is a lean.
Please don't be a D-Bag in my thread. I'm not in the mood. Thanks.
...I like your input on the cub's pick and if i had to choose one it would be them
Posted:
#72
Quote Originally Posted by GIMMETHEPOINTS:
and the Under is 7.5 now...glad i grabbed it at 8
and the Under is 7.5 now...glad i grabbed it at 8
I would personally be worried about the line moving to 7.5 and it's now juiced at -125 at my book. Missing something, or it's the best play on the board and everyone is jumping on it. LOL!
Best of luck.
Posted:
#73
Might be playing the cubs too.... not sure yet but will decide.. i am a little concerned about dempster and manager being onthe same page.
On another note, I read your blog post and while I appreciate the attempt to parallel differences between men and women, the focus on porn is a little off-putting. I'll conceed the stereotype of oversexed misogynist knuckle-dragging apes of the degenerate gambler, standing next to the blonde , full tittied, bimbo ,
I hope you realize that some men are gentlemen lovers who dont get excited by the thought of a 12 " schlong porking someone in the behind.
(allthough,,, that is a good description of how you feel after a cubs game)
Posted:
#75
Quote Originally Posted by archdriver:
Might be playing the cubs too.... not sure yet but will decide.. i am a little concerned about dempster and manager being onthe same page.
On another note, I read your blog post and while I appreciate the attempt to parallel differences between men and women, the focus on porn is a little off-putting. I'll conceed the stereotype of oversexed misogynist knuckle-dragging apes of the degenerate gambler, standing next to the blonde , full tittied, bimbo ,
I hope you realize that some men are gentlemen lovers who dont get excited by the thought of a 12 " schlong porking someone in the behind.
(allthough,,, that is a good description of how you feel after a cubs game)
LOL! That friend of mine is the stereotypical "Man's man."
I don't believe that's what all guys are like, just like all women aren't "clueless bimbos" in regards to sports betting. That's the underlying message of the column. :)
Hot Forum Topics
