All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

September Dogs - Starting with $4k

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 768918
Posts: 1630
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1501
Baltimore Orioles +0.75 +116 
vs Kansas City Royals
$84 to win $97.44

  • MLB TREND OF THE DAY: https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28H%20and%20P%3AL%20and%20Po%3Aruns%3E%3D10%20and%20s%3Astarter%20walks%3C2%20and%205%3Eseries%20games%3E2%20and%20season%3E2010%29%20as%20%22Home%20teams%20that%20lost%20last%20matchup%20allowing%2010%2B%20runs%20now%20starting%20a%20pitcher%20that%20allowed%201%20or%200%20runs%20last%20start%20fail%3A%2095-150%20-84.5%20units%20SU.%22&plot_PL=1 (Fade the Royals

  • EXTRA SYSTEM: https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28tS%28runs%3E6%2CN%3D3%29%3D3%20and%20line%3E-115%20and%209%3Emonth%3E5%29%20as%20%22After%20the%20beginning%20of%20regular%20season%20and%20filtering%20out%20the%20last%20month%20as%20well%2C%20dogs%20or%20very%20small%20favorites%20off%20of%203%2B%20straight%20games%20where%20they%20score%20over%206%20runs%20are%20103-96%20%2B31.9%20units%22&plot_PL=1

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 268
Posted: #1502
Happy September

Let's Roll
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1503
Here's September and woof woof boys. Let's hit it!

Detroit Tigers +2.25 +148
vs New York Yankees
$140 to win $207.20

(Take the +2.5 and the +1 in two separate bets and use the calculator I linked in profile....or I think EV on Moneyline!)

  • MLB TREND OF THE DAY: https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28WP%3E60%20and%20month%3E8%20and%20playoffs%3D0%20and%20F%29%20as%20%22Fade%20plus%20.600%20Favorites%20at%20the%20end%20of%20regular%20season%3A%20218-185%20-93.44%20units%20SU%20%2B15.5%25%20roi%20fade.%20Very%20simple%2C%20very%20powerful.%22&plot_PL=1 (Fade the Yankees)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 106
Posted: #1504
wait is this guys bankroll to 13k from 4k ALL OF OF DOGS? 

CAN SOMEONE CONFIRM SO I DONT HAVE TO GO THROUGH all 61 pages ..

amazing if so.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2018
Posts: 967
Posted: #1505
Quote Originally Posted by TALLYHOESD:

wait is this guys bankroll to 13k from 4k ALL OF OF DOGS? 

CAN SOMEONE CONFIRM SO I DONT HAVE TO GO THROUGH all 61 pages ..

amazing if so.

yeahh took 6 years tho..meanwhile if you put 4k on amazon stock wouldve like 30k lol
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 6372
Posted: #1506
Back in the W column 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1507
Quote Originally Posted by herbshack:

Here's September and woof woof boys. Let's hit it!

Detroit Tigers +2.25 +148
vs New York Yankees
$140 to win $207.20

(Take the +2.5 and the +1 in two separate bets and use the calculator I linked in profile....or I think EV on Moneyline!)

  • MLB TREND OF THE DAY: https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28WP%3E60%20and%20month%3E8%20and%20playoffs%3D0%20and%20F%29%20as%20%22Fade%20plus%20.600%20Favorites%20at%20the%20end%20of%20regular%20season%3A%20218-185%20-93.44%20units%20SU%20%2B15.5%25%20roi%20fade.%20Very%20simple%2C%20very%20powerful.%22&plot_PL=1 (Fade the Yankees)

Tigers kept is close for a winner there and a new all time thread high at:
Current Bankroll: $13,858.91
from $4000 (+246.47 units)
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1508
Quote Originally Posted by daebaknaja:


yeahh took 6 years tho..meanwhile if you put 4k on amazon stock wouldve like 30k lol

$4k is a hypothetical roll. Just thought $4k would be good because it is what I think the minimum for any roll should be.
Also, we're not all Jeff Bezos :P

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1509
Quote Originally Posted by monkeebooger:

Back in the W column 

Onwards and upwards.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1510
For today: 

Toronto Blue Jays +0.75 +111 
vs Tampa Bay Rays
$60 to win $66.60

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 57420
Posted: #1511
can Royals do it again?

they are on a surprising winning streak wow.
Sip on that plus money honey!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1512
Detroit Tigers +0.75 +147
vs Chicago White Sox
$87 to win $127.89

  • MLB TREND OF THE DAY: https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28AD%20and%20RG3%20and%20on%3AH%20and%20%28day%20%3D%20Wednesday%20or%20day%20%3D%20Thursday%29%20and%20op%3Amargin%3C3%20and%20WP%3C58%20and%20o%3AWP%3E36%20and%20total%3E7%29%20as%20%22Weekday%20Rubber%20Game%3A%20Take%20the%20sub%20.580%20Road%20Dog%20facing%20a%20plus%20.360%20team.%20Ignore%20situations%20where%20the%20opponent%20won%20by%203%2B%20runs%20last%20game%20and%20very%20low%20pitcher%20dual%20totals%20for%20175-179%20%2B59.69%20%2B16.9%25%20roi.%22&plot_PL=1 (Take the Tigers and Orioles)

  • https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28-145%3Eline%3E%3D-200%20and%20tA%28margin%29%3C%3D-.5%20and%20po%3Aruns%3E7%20and%20season%3E2012%29%20as%20%22Since%202012%2C%20teams%20that%20lose%20by%20an%20average%200.5%20rpg%20on%20the%20season%20for%20-145%20to%20-200%20are%2016-26%20-27.52%20units%2C%20%2B58.2%25%20roi%20SU%20after%20allowing%20over%207%20runs.%22&plot_PL=1 (Fade the White Sox)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2016
Posts: 2477
Posted: #1513

Good luck . 

"The System Is Designed to Destroy the Degenerate Gambler" - Joey Diaz
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1514
Quote Originally Posted by herbshack:

Detroit Tigers +0.75 +147
vs Chicago White Sox
$87 to win $127.89

  • BIG WINNER! 
    10-2 road blowout victory for the Tigers...

Current Bankroll: $13,926.80
from $4000 (+248.17 units)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 268
Posted: #1515

Simply Amazing thread!

If you have a moment, could you please accept a pending friend request from me?

Thanks!an_clap

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1516
Quote Originally Posted by SliPKnuT:

Simply Amazing thread!

If you have a moment, could you please accept a pending friend request from me?

Thanks!an_clap

Sure thing
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1517
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.25 +126
vs Atlanta Braves
$67 to win $84.42

  • MLB TREND OF THE DAY: https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28starter%3DZack%20Greinke%20and%20season%3E2010%20and%20H%20and%20line%3C-120%20and%20o%3AWP%3E25%20and%20series%20game%3C4%20and%20p%3Aruns%3E0%20and%20p%3Aruns%3C11%29%20as%20%22FILTER%3A%20Since%202010%2C%20Zack%20Greinke%3B%20home%20favorite%20%3C-120%3B%20normal%20conditions%3B%2046-1%20%2B44.3%20units%22&plot_PL=1 - Greinke is a freak at home. This is now 76-8! That means 30 games went by since inception of the trend and Greinke only lost 7 of 30 (77% win rate in forward tracking).

  • For those who may have missed it or glazed over it; there's a key factor in trends and systems I look at that I think a lot of other cappers...honestly...haven't probably figured out a way to quantify: that's forward progress of your trend and system / record since inception.

    I called this FwdZ -- If it is ATS or OU I use regular standard score to rate forward progress and if moneyline bets, I use a modified version of standard score. Standard score is a lot like basic 'rate' or 'percentage' except, with the square root of the sample size in the denominator, Z-score or 'standard score' distinguishes small 10-0 100% records from 50-0 100% records where the sample size adds a statistical credence to the metric.

    In the case of the Greinke trend:
    *The Z-score was: +6.85 at inception
    *It is now a whopping +7.42 z
    *In forward progress it went 30-7 SU which is a practically unseen +3.78z

    Note: Statistically speaking, anything above +2.0 (std score = (wins - losses) / (sqrt (wins+losses)))
    is considered 'very meaningful' and worth analytical inspection....so +6, +7, +3.78 are all off the charts. 
    In plain English that equates to: There is definately a reason ZacK Greinke has shredded opponents when starting at home.

  • Important: Unfortunately, it seems over 70% of the public bets agree with us on Greinke. After so much blatent shredding, you have to expect the public to shift onto the trend. As a linemaker, this is the kind of thing you really hate. The public is all going to take Greinke at this point; perhaps still the site parameter being slightly under the radar; and the win rate is so heavy, it becomes difficult to issue this bet: So the linesmakers do two things: They'll roll the dice and use reverse psychology: Make the line strangly low. Make bettors glean over it seeing : 'Greinke at home and that cheap? must be a trap' and a bet not made is a victory if you're a bookmaker. Either that or exploit the home / away dichotomy: Greinke is stellar at home, but if you inspect the condition: 'site' , you'll see that it harshly crumbles when he starts on the road: 94-109 SU (46.3%, -23.64 units). 
    That is one of the largest home performance vs. road performance differentials in the league, and Greinke on the road is the real trap.

    At home though, it is very simple: Greinke, -120 or more home favorite, regular series game
    = https://killersports.com/mlb/query?su=1&ou=1&sdql=starter+%3D+Zack+Greinke+and+site+%3D+home+and+line%3C%3D-120+and+series+game%3C4+and+total-s%3Atotal%3E-3&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++

    We'll take those odds for just a bit over -150 which isn't all that large of a home favorite as home favorites go let alone with an extreme ace on the mound.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 95
Posted: #1518

Thank you for the info herb. Good luckpeace_5

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1519
Bullpen blew it yesterday, but Greinke came thru. Maybe first 5 innings was the better bet, but hindsight is always 20/20. Cest la vie...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2017
Posts: 148
Posted: #1520
Quote Originally Posted by herbshack:

Bullpen blew it yesterday, but Greinke came thru. Maybe first 5 innings was the better bet, but hindsight is always 20/20. Cest la vie...

they were losing after 5 innings.  they should have won the game though.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1521
Los Angeles Angels +0.75 +107
vs Chicago White Sox
$80 to win $85.60

  • I think it might sound like non-sense, but I'm doing two trends of the day, just because they're very different in that: one is a team based trend, the other a league wide broad system; and secondly, they synergize because they pinwheel off of an uncannily similar 

  • MLB TREND OF THE DAY: https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28-15%3Cp%3Amargin%3C-7%20and%20month%3E5%20and%20line%3E-200%20and%20p%3Aline%3C190%20and%2016%3Eop%3Aruns%3E3%20and%20p%3Aruns%3C8%20and%205.5%3Ctotal%3C11.5%29%20as%20%22Eser%20Trend%3A%20491-683%20-210.5%20units%2C%20%2B10.5%25%20roi%20to%20fade%20SU.%20Take%20a%20team%20that%20isn%27t%20a%20huge%20favorite%20off%20of%20a%20massive%208%2B%20run%20loss%20and%20fade%20them%20in%20the%20second%20half%20of%20the%20season.%22&plot_PL=1491-683 -210.5 units, +10.5% roi to fade SU. Take a team that isn't a huge favorite off of a massive 8+ run loss and fade them in the second half of the season. (Fade the White Sox)https://killersports.com/mlb/query?sdql=%28-15%3Cp%3Amargin%3C-7%20and%20month%3E5%20and%20line%3E-200%20and%20p%3Aline%3C190%20and%2016%3Eop%3Aruns%3E3%20and%20p%3Aruns%3C8%20and%205.5%3Ctotal%3C11.5%29%20as%20%22Eser%20Trend%3A%20491-683%20-210.5%20units%2C%20%2B10.5%25%20roi%20to%20fade%20SU.%20Take%20a%20team%20that%20isn%27t%20a%20huge%20favorite%20off%20of%20a%20massive%208%2B%20run%20loss%20and%20fade%20them%20in%20the%20second%20half%20of%20the%20season.%22&plot_PL=1

  • MLB TREND OF THE DAY #2:  https://killersports.com/mlb/query?su=1&ou=1&sdql=po%3Ateam%3DTigers+and+%28op%3Amargin%3E%3D6+or+-5%3Eop%3Amargin%3E-9%29++and+p%3ASII%21%3D0++and+p%3Astart+time%3C2015+and+op%3Arest%3C2+and+p%3Arest%3C2+and+p%3Amargin%21%3D-1+and+op%3Amargin%21%3D-1++and+season%3E%3D2014&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++

    However, if we we make sure that the opponent isn't off of some kind of flukey win (p:SII!=0 + p:margin!=-1) < no high flying scored 1 run loss margins that could have easily landed on some score like 6-7 loss and p:SII!=0 rules out those pitcher duals where a tight margin like 1-0 is proportionally much larger a thing than a fluke) There wasn't just one weird inning where the opponent dialed up a bunch of runs skewing the number, making the win look like a bigger deal that it probably was / setting conditions more indicative of a situation where the opponent is playing well-rounded and on the ball fully and not just one hot player or something).

    Lastly, if the opponent was not well rested and still crushed a win like that (over 6+ run win margin), AND neither was the previous opponent of the Tigers (Under 2 days rest each), the team is just 33-64 SU 34.0% and -31.6% roi to fade! (Fade the White Sox! Take the Angels)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 375
Posted: #1522

The converter excel file for +0.75 doesn't seem to work properly. I have odds of -104 for ML and -204 for +1.5 line and it gives an error. Seems like you would need pretty great ML and RL odds to get +107. Almost all of your lines you're getting amazing odds. Mind if I ask you what book you're using? Thanks herbs! Keep up the good work!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1523
oh for a dog with minus odds it must be positive on the money line so just instead of -104 do +96 ; (a dog minus 4 points positive value and the calc will understand)

But I got +115 earlier on the Angels I guess it slipped.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 913
Posted: #1524
Quote Originally Posted by herbshack:

Los Angeles Angels +0.75 +107
vs Chicago White Sox
$80 to win $85.60

  • WINNER!

Current Bankroll: $13,945.40
from $4000 (+248.63 units)

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2015
Posts: 333
Posted: #1525
Nice job herb !! 
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.