All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

PLAY OF THE CENTURY ALERT!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2190
Posts: 59
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 6913
Posted: #26
century = 100 years 

GL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 786
Posted: #27
Lets put it like this... My last one was NY over TB (Joba vs. Garza)
 
Then Verlander Wednesday..... DO THE MATH!
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1885
Posted: #28


Im on PITT -1.5 and ML


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 23609
Posted: #29
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 17534
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by geezytha8man:

Lets put it like this... My last one was NY over TB (Joba vs. Garza)
 
Then Verlander Wednesday..... DO THE MATH!


Not sure that has any relevance here. You don't control the outcome of the game. Like I said, best of luck. I would be happy if you won the game 3-0 as I am on the Under First 5 innings. The under is supported by more statistics and information than the side play and I was just trying to give you the counterargument against your play.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 67
Posted: #31
GH always great insight under f5! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 473
Posted: #32
Both of yall have great points (GAMEHUNTER & 8MAN). Nats are hot but when players go down (as in trades too) you always have somebody ready to shine. NATS IN small PLAY....BOL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 786
Posted: #33
GAMEHUNTER
 
CIPDOGG
 
CANEMANTEDOR
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 730
Posted: #34
On it with you
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 4129
Posted: #35
lol,, calling it game of the century,, well that  happens here every week. 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1885
Posted: #36
No Nick Johnson now hes usually good for a walk a game
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 198
Posted: #37
"Pirates are  7-3 under in Ohlendorf's 10 home starts."

Well, what Pirates are those? That history is meaningless since the ENTIRE TEAM is gone. Plus, Morgan, who is now on the Nats, is on fire and will be more than glad to stick it to his old disgrace of a franchise. As far as relevant pst history, Ohlendorf allowed 5 runs in 5 earlier this year to a NATS team that is now better. 
Think about it, this is the shortest price you are going to get against the pirates from here on out, b/c they will probably be dogs in every game except when duke tosses at home. 
Its a good play. 

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1885
Posted: #38
Mccuthen is 3 for 5, Doumit is 3 for 5, Laroche is 2 for 6, Jaramillo is 1 for 3, ronny cedeno is 2 for 6,

its not like this lineup hasnt seen lannan before. these guys have been playing
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 14
Posted: #39
I agree with the pick but play of the century is stretching it... First of all its the Nationals and secondly... the players the Pirates lost were not that great anyway. Some of the guys who took over are just as good as the guys who left. But as I said... I am betting on the Nationals as well... and its actually my best pick for today considering the line but I wudn't go overboard by calling it the play of the century.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 236
Posted: #40
Play of the century? You should bet your life, house, and everything else you own.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 82
Posted: #41
NATS
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #42
I cant believe Im doing this but I just made my regualr play on the Nats a huge play! With all of these games from here on out having high juice its imperable for me to find good value on my large plays, bothing more than 130 or so and -120 for John Lannan vs a AA team is too much to pass up. Morgan is one of the best leadoffs in the game, Guzman is hitting .301, Zimmerman has found his stroke, and Dunn still puts fear in pitchers hearts. Not to mention Willingham swinging a hot bat and my arch nemesis Willy Harris in the lineup. I need Lannan to go 8 put in Burnett and hope and pray McDougal doesnt blow the save
 
Nats -120 to win $2000......guys pray for me
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1354
Posted: #43
There goes an honest man showing real money on his bets. Unlike people who shows 9,900 or something like that.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 20320
Posted: #44
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1885
Posted: #45
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2843
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by geezytha8man:

Guys,

I never thought it would be possible to lay so many units on a team of this calliber either but you have zero knowledge if you lean Pittsburg here. GL though,

glad to know that I am up +100 units for the month!!!

 

HATERS!

 

i had nothing bad to say until the zero knowledge line, but since you say someone else might cuz of an opinion what do you think of mine:

 

u r a liar!

 

over 30 days u r up 100 units and your largest action this summer is 12 units and you bet 4 or 5 on the rest of your card, so in other words you are saying you win 80% of your plays or you are lying, i choose to lean the latter.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2843
Posted: #47
by the way youd be playing +110 dogs at 80% to get to that # in a month, u r full of it
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 152
Posted: #48
This jerkoff had a parlay of the year that lost the other night.Can you come up with some new material.I also predicted in that thread a play of the century was coming.
 
 
 
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 6201
Posted: #49
" Play of The Century "


Ranks right up there with " The Call "


bol
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 211
Posted: #50
$300 and game of the century in the same sentence and then add Nats into the parograph ?
 
how about "I decided to make a big play for me"
 
this does not come close to "a game of the century to bet"
 
sorry I got sucked in by the title.
 
Not trying to be a prick but lets be realistic.
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.