The games aren't over yet and we also already have one pending series won (SD), but, I'm already posting tomorrow's picks - martingaling today's losses while the odds are better than they will be later.
NY Yankees - TB Rays Over 9 +100 $450
TEX Rangers ML -170 $1.148
TEX Rangers -1.5 +120 $900
HOU Astros - CHI White Sox Under 8.5 -115 $518
CIN Reds ML -120 $540
BOS Red Sox -1.5 -105 $472
0
The games aren't over yet and we also already have one pending series won (SD), but, I'm already posting tomorrow's picks - martingaling today's losses while the odds are better than they will be later.
My better half says I'm so desperate to satisfy my ego and post winners that I'm even ready to post that she won a game in bridge. So, here it is - she won. She didn't get paid yet but she will make me to...
2
My better half says I'm so desperate to satisfy my ego and post winners that I'm even ready to post that she won a game in bridge. So, here it is - she won. She didn't get paid yet but she will make me to...
The games aren't over yet and we also already have one pending series won (SD), but, I'm already posting tomorrow's picks - martingaling today's losses while the odds are better than they will be later.
NY Yankees - TB Rays Over 9 +100 $450
TEX Rangers ML -170 $1.148
TEX Rangers -1.5 +120 $900
HOU Astros - CHI White Sox Under 8.5 -115 $518
CIN Reds ML -120 $540
BOS Red Sox -1.5 -105 $472
0
Sunday slate
The games aren't over yet and we also already have one pending series won (SD), but, I'm already posting tomorrow's picks - martingaling today's losses while the odds are better than they will be later.
The games aren't over yet and we also already have one pending series won (SD), but, I'm already posting tomorrow's picks - martingaling today's losses while the odds are better than they will be later.
NY Yankees - TB Rays Over 9 +100 $450
TEX Rangers ML -170 $1.148
TEX Rangers -1.5 +120 $900
HOU Astros - CHI White Sox Under 8.5 -115 $518
CIN Reds ML -120 $540
BOS Red Sox -1.5 -105 $472
ATL Braves ML +130 $150
ATL Braves +1.5 -120 $540
0
Sunday slate
The games aren't over yet and we also already have one pending series won (SD), but, I'm already posting tomorrow's picks - martingaling today's losses while the odds are better than they will be later.
I don't think my bottom line needs help, but, thanks for the intention. You see, I play according to a system which is not a single event or a single day outcome dependent. From the beginning the system targets sequence of events with potential volatility based on historical data per say integrated with immediate historical data - all creating a solid ground for sound reverse engineering that provides picks, their size unit wise. Now, since we don't want to depend on a single bet outcome no matter how super high probability it carries - our approach is quantitive betting based on positive P/L ratio with over 53% W/L rate across the board any day everyday. But, that alone is not enough. As you all can see our W/L record is negative and by far. In a regular betting environment - we'd be losing our pants only by paying juice/wig/commission. Let alone having negative record. So, how come we are profitable, and not by little? Mathematics!!! Employing mathematical models of progressive growth exploiting volatility factor integrating Hidden Markov Model with X3 Martingale - or in simple words - tripling up after each loss. So simple? No. The trick is finding game sequences with high potential for volatility. But, again, thanks for your well intended comment
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mskeets:
I’m out… should help your bottom line.
I don't think my bottom line needs help, but, thanks for the intention. You see, I play according to a system which is not a single event or a single day outcome dependent. From the beginning the system targets sequence of events with potential volatility based on historical data per say integrated with immediate historical data - all creating a solid ground for sound reverse engineering that provides picks, their size unit wise. Now, since we don't want to depend on a single bet outcome no matter how super high probability it carries - our approach is quantitive betting based on positive P/L ratio with over 53% W/L rate across the board any day everyday. But, that alone is not enough. As you all can see our W/L record is negative and by far. In a regular betting environment - we'd be losing our pants only by paying juice/wig/commission. Let alone having negative record. So, how come we are profitable, and not by little? Mathematics!!! Employing mathematical models of progressive growth exploiting volatility factor integrating Hidden Markov Model with X3 Martingale - or in simple words - tripling up after each loss. So simple? No. The trick is finding game sequences with high potential for volatility. But, again, thanks for your well intended comment
@ChatBIN OK, I'll bite. If you wouldn't mind, walk me through your thinking on the SD/NY wagers, I'm genuinely curious on your method here.
Quantum Physics based reverse engineering from all possible end game scenarios. Each scenario with all possible paths leading to a specific to that scenario end game. Once you will run all the scenarios - you will come to the same conclusion that starting with NYY winning game 1 and series won by the Padres is the safest bets in their own category with the highest chance of winning both ways. And if one of them fails -chances of full hedging are over 92% based on 5 years plus this season model excluding Covid times games altogether
*end game = series ending including all the potential bets during the journey with probabilistic model and HMM and Martingale models integrated
1
Quote Originally Posted by iceman67:
@ChatBIN OK, I'll bite. If you wouldn't mind, walk me through your thinking on the SD/NY wagers, I'm genuinely curious on your method here.
Quantum Physics based reverse engineering from all possible end game scenarios. Each scenario with all possible paths leading to a specific to that scenario end game. Once you will run all the scenarios - you will come to the same conclusion that starting with NYY winning game 1 and series won by the Padres is the safest bets in their own category with the highest chance of winning both ways. And if one of them fails -chances of full hedging are over 92% based on 5 years plus this season model excluding Covid times games altogether
*end game = series ending including all the potential bets during the journey with probabilistic model and HMM and Martingale models integrated
Quote Originally Posted by iceman67: @ChatBIN OK, I'll bite. If you wouldn't mind, walk me through your thinking on the SD/NY wagers, I'm genuinely curious on your method here.Quantum Physics based reverse engineering from all possible end game scenarios. Each scenario with all possible paths leading to a specific to that scenario end game. Once you will run all the scenarios - you will come to the same conclusion that starting with NYY winning game 1 and series won by the Padres is the safest bets in their own category with the highest chance of winning both ways. And if one of them fails -chances of full hedging are over 92% based on 5 years plus this season model excluding Covid times games altogether *end game = series ending including all the potential bets during the journey with probabilistic model and HMM and Martingale models integrated
Does anyone here understands what this gentleman is talking about? Because, I do. And if what you describe here Chat is true - and I don't have a reason to doubt anything you say because you keep your records transparent and clear and like most Math Professors (isn't that what you are?) you'd have a hard time lying because that would interfere with profound mathematical logic turning your philosophy into disruptive science. So, tell me please, aren't you a bit arrogant or completely mad announcing for all to know that you actually have achieved what most world scientific institutions would "kill" for? Quantum Physics based reverse engineering? That means that you can find a cure to anything just reverse engineering positive results? Please make me understand that because on this verge of 169th birthday of Sigmund Freud - your declaration sounds like big big BS engineered to mess the minds of unwitty.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN:
Quote Originally Posted by iceman67: @ChatBIN OK, I'll bite. If you wouldn't mind, walk me through your thinking on the SD/NY wagers, I'm genuinely curious on your method here.Quantum Physics based reverse engineering from all possible end game scenarios. Each scenario with all possible paths leading to a specific to that scenario end game. Once you will run all the scenarios - you will come to the same conclusion that starting with NYY winning game 1 and series won by the Padres is the safest bets in their own category with the highest chance of winning both ways. And if one of them fails -chances of full hedging are over 92% based on 5 years plus this season model excluding Covid times games altogether *end game = series ending including all the potential bets during the journey with probabilistic model and HMM and Martingale models integrated
Does anyone here understands what this gentleman is talking about? Because, I do. And if what you describe here Chat is true - and I don't have a reason to doubt anything you say because you keep your records transparent and clear and like most Math Professors (isn't that what you are?) you'd have a hard time lying because that would interfere with profound mathematical logic turning your philosophy into disruptive science. So, tell me please, aren't you a bit arrogant or completely mad announcing for all to know that you actually have achieved what most world scientific institutions would "kill" for? Quantum Physics based reverse engineering? That means that you can find a cure to anything just reverse engineering positive results? Please make me understand that because on this verge of 169th birthday of Sigmund Freud - your declaration sounds like big big BS engineered to mess the minds of unwitty.
Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN: Quote Originally Posted by iceman67: @ChatBIN OK, I'll bite. If you wouldn't mind, walk me through your thinking on the SD/NY wagers, I'm genuinely curious on your method here.Quantum Physics based reverse engineering from all possible end game scenarios. Each scenario with all possible paths leading to a specific to that scenario end game. Once you will run all the scenarios - you will come to the same conclusion that starting with NYY winning game 1 and series won by the Padres is the safest bets in their own category with the highest chance of winning both ways. And if one of them fails -chances of full hedging are over 92% based on 5 years plus this season model excluding Covid times games altogether *end game = series ending including all the potential bets during the journey with probabilistic model and HMM and Martingale models integratedDoes anyone here understands what this gentleman is talking about? Because, I do. And if what you describe here Chat is true - and I don't have a reason to doubt anything you say because you keep your records transparent and clear and like most Math Professors (isn't that what you are?) you'd have a hard time lying because that would interfere with profound mathematical logic turning your philosophy into disruptive science. So, tell me please, aren't you a bit arrogant or completely mad announcing for all to know that you actually have achieved what most world scientific institutions would "kill" for? Quantum Physics based reverse engineering? That means that you can find a cure to anything just reverse engineering positive results? Please make me understand that because on this verge of 169th birthday of Sigmund Freud - your declaration sounds like big big BS engineered to mess the minds of unwitty.
Well, just taking Mr Claude Shannon's name doesn't necessarily make you late Mr Claude Shannon, doesn't it? The series between NYY and SD are a 3 game series. That means we can only have 8 possible scenarios
Team A wins 3-0 (1 scenario)
Scenario 1:
Game 1: Team A wins
Game 2: Team A wins
Game 3: Team A wins
Team A wins 2-1 (3 scenarios)
Scenario 1:
Game 1: Team A wins
Game 2: Team A wins
Game 3: Team B wins
Scenario 2:
Game 1: Team A wins
Game 2: Team B wins
Game 3: Team A wins
Scenario 3:
Game 1: Team B wins
Game 2: Team A wins
Game 3: Team A wins
Team B wins 2-1 (3 scenarios)
Scenario 1:
Game 1: Team B wins
Game 2: Team B wins
Game 3: Team A wins
Scenario 2:
Game 1: Team B wins
Game 2: Team A wins
Game 3: Team B wins
Scenario 3:
Game 1: Team A wins
Game 2: Team B wins
Game 3: Team B wins
Team B wins 3-0 (1 scenario)
Scenario 1:
Game 1: Team B wins
Game 2: Team B wins
Game 3: Team B wins
These 8 different sequences represent all possible outcomes in a 3-game series.
So, please tell me what is A difference between having Quantum Computing machine (I don't have it and I don't know if anyone even is half way there developing it) and Quantum Physics based reverse engineering of possible 8 outcomes?
I'll tell you: any 5th grader can do what I did
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClaudeShannon1:
Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN: Quote Originally Posted by iceman67: @ChatBIN OK, I'll bite. If you wouldn't mind, walk me through your thinking on the SD/NY wagers, I'm genuinely curious on your method here.Quantum Physics based reverse engineering from all possible end game scenarios. Each scenario with all possible paths leading to a specific to that scenario end game. Once you will run all the scenarios - you will come to the same conclusion that starting with NYY winning game 1 and series won by the Padres is the safest bets in their own category with the highest chance of winning both ways. And if one of them fails -chances of full hedging are over 92% based on 5 years plus this season model excluding Covid times games altogether *end game = series ending including all the potential bets during the journey with probabilistic model and HMM and Martingale models integratedDoes anyone here understands what this gentleman is talking about? Because, I do. And if what you describe here Chat is true - and I don't have a reason to doubt anything you say because you keep your records transparent and clear and like most Math Professors (isn't that what you are?) you'd have a hard time lying because that would interfere with profound mathematical logic turning your philosophy into disruptive science. So, tell me please, aren't you a bit arrogant or completely mad announcing for all to know that you actually have achieved what most world scientific institutions would "kill" for? Quantum Physics based reverse engineering? That means that you can find a cure to anything just reverse engineering positive results? Please make me understand that because on this verge of 169th birthday of Sigmund Freud - your declaration sounds like big big BS engineered to mess the minds of unwitty.
Well, just taking Mr Claude Shannon's name doesn't necessarily make you late Mr Claude Shannon, doesn't it? The series between NYY and SD are a 3 game series. That means we can only have 8 possible scenarios
Team A wins 3-0 (1 scenario)
Scenario 1:
Game 1: Team A wins
Game 2: Team A wins
Game 3: Team A wins
Team A wins 2-1 (3 scenarios)
Scenario 1:
Game 1: Team A wins
Game 2: Team A wins
Game 3: Team B wins
Scenario 2:
Game 1: Team A wins
Game 2: Team B wins
Game 3: Team A wins
Scenario 3:
Game 1: Team B wins
Game 2: Team A wins
Game 3: Team A wins
Team B wins 2-1 (3 scenarios)
Scenario 1:
Game 1: Team B wins
Game 2: Team B wins
Game 3: Team A wins
Scenario 2:
Game 1: Team B wins
Game 2: Team A wins
Game 3: Team B wins
Scenario 3:
Game 1: Team A wins
Game 2: Team B wins
Game 3: Team B wins
Team B wins 3-0 (1 scenario)
Scenario 1:
Game 1: Team B wins
Game 2: Team B wins
Game 3: Team B wins
These 8 different sequences represent all possible outcomes in a 3-game series.
So, please tell me what is A difference between having Quantum Computing machine (I don't have it and I don't know if anyone even is half way there developing it) and Quantum Physics based reverse engineering of possible 8 outcomes?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.