Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN: Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN: May 22 — Picks (risk ˜ 9.0 U) Game Pick & line* Units Edge snapshot Rangers @ Yankees 12:35 ET Over 8.5 (-110) 1 19 mph out to RF; Rodón HR/FB 15 % vs 118 OPS+ TEX; NYY pen fresh but Rangers pen gassed. Padres @ Blue Jays 1:07 ET Padres ML (-118) 3 Kolek 2.33 ERA, 55 % GB; Francis 5.63 ERA, Jays Tier-2 pen taxed; roof closed limits Toronto HR edge. Diamondbacks @ Dodgers 10:10 ET Under 8 (-105) 3 Pfaadt v Stone; Stone 30.1 CSW last two; 7 mph in from LF; D-backs pen 1 IP Wed keeps Tier-3 rested. Rays @ Red Sox 7:10 ET Red Sox ML (+102) 1 Boston 117 OPS+ at home; Littell vs Crawford (0.92 WHIP May); Nor’easter leaves damp air + swirling L-to-R wind—favors Sox spray hitters. Brewers @ Orioles 6:35 ET Under 8.5 (-110) 1 American Family roof likely closed; Sugano 53 % GB vs Kremer (return); O’s bats still ice-cold (.289 wOBA last 10).That was off course an error on part of the machine Machines don't make mistakes. It's human error. So full of it ... constant mistakes on a daily bases. Got a lot of time to talk about unstructured data AI bs but can't use a spreadsheet to keep your records straight. A 1u bet on -110 but type it in as a $100 risk and said "oh I like to risk less" LMAO. It was only a few days ago your were up a little and bragging about the "system" is working with calculated weekly ROI. My goodness.... and what happened to your fancy series betting system of betting a team to win 1st game and betting the same team lose the 3 game series? What kind of crazy hedging logic is that? You are all over the place in a public arena and deserve to be called out.
I'm sorry your life must be full of disappointments and mean events. I truly am. It is very important to first of all take care of your mental health as your state of hate for nothing can be very harmful for your immediate surroundings if there is still anyone left.
If your sole purpose is coming into this thread and instead of making some positive contribution -trying only to discriminate whatever I and other normal members of this community trying to do - you better avoid coming in here and getting yourself aggravated for nothing. We are not your enemies. You are your own enemy as we all are to ourselves. So, please, be kind to yourself and try to drink lots of water and take whatever it is you are taking to calm down
0
Quote Originally Posted by ALEXSON:
Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN: Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN: May 22 — Picks (risk ˜ 9.0 U) Game Pick & line* Units Edge snapshot Rangers @ Yankees 12:35 ET Over 8.5 (-110) 1 19 mph out to RF; Rodón HR/FB 15 % vs 118 OPS+ TEX; NYY pen fresh but Rangers pen gassed. Padres @ Blue Jays 1:07 ET Padres ML (-118) 3 Kolek 2.33 ERA, 55 % GB; Francis 5.63 ERA, Jays Tier-2 pen taxed; roof closed limits Toronto HR edge. Diamondbacks @ Dodgers 10:10 ET Under 8 (-105) 3 Pfaadt v Stone; Stone 30.1 CSW last two; 7 mph in from LF; D-backs pen 1 IP Wed keeps Tier-3 rested. Rays @ Red Sox 7:10 ET Red Sox ML (+102) 1 Boston 117 OPS+ at home; Littell vs Crawford (0.92 WHIP May); Nor’easter leaves damp air + swirling L-to-R wind—favors Sox spray hitters. Brewers @ Orioles 6:35 ET Under 8.5 (-110) 1 American Family roof likely closed; Sugano 53 % GB vs Kremer (return); O’s bats still ice-cold (.289 wOBA last 10).That was off course an error on part of the machine Machines don't make mistakes. It's human error. So full of it ... constant mistakes on a daily bases. Got a lot of time to talk about unstructured data AI bs but can't use a spreadsheet to keep your records straight. A 1u bet on -110 but type it in as a $100 risk and said "oh I like to risk less" LMAO. It was only a few days ago your were up a little and bragging about the "system" is working with calculated weekly ROI. My goodness.... and what happened to your fancy series betting system of betting a team to win 1st game and betting the same team lose the 3 game series? What kind of crazy hedging logic is that? You are all over the place in a public arena and deserve to be called out.
I'm sorry your life must be full of disappointments and mean events. I truly am. It is very important to first of all take care of your mental health as your state of hate for nothing can be very harmful for your immediate surroundings if there is still anyone left.
If your sole purpose is coming into this thread and instead of making some positive contribution -trying only to discriminate whatever I and other normal members of this community trying to do - you better avoid coming in here and getting yourself aggravated for nothing. We are not your enemies. You are your own enemy as we all are to ourselves. So, please, be kind to yourself and try to drink lots of water and take whatever it is you are taking to calm down
Thanks for your response. I love the tools you are losing. I didn’t express myself too well. What I meant to say was, when considering the bets you make and the amounts, I wonder how we can discover which is the better of the two? Put another way, if you picked the same sides each time but had a different wagering strategy would you win more or less?
I understood perfectly what you meant. For an example - today we will get back to our old systems that helped us double our bankroll but with better filtering instruments. There are few matchups today, few series beginning that the sweep is out of question for any of the sides involved. Now, taking that and using Markov model with enhanced martingale as well filtering the teams with Monte Carlo simulating system for the rest of the season creates a build up and more we advance throughout the season we are left with less possibilities making easier to choose the winners or at least those who won't lose like SD did now and some other teams from the elite group of 8 are doing periodically. I will soon post the plays and you will understand better.
1
Quote Originally Posted by R1729amanujan:
Thanks for your response. I love the tools you are losing. I didn’t express myself too well. What I meant to say was, when considering the bets you make and the amounts, I wonder how we can discover which is the better of the two? Put another way, if you picked the same sides each time but had a different wagering strategy would you win more or less?
I understood perfectly what you meant. For an example - today we will get back to our old systems that helped us double our bankroll but with better filtering instruments. There are few matchups today, few series beginning that the sweep is out of question for any of the sides involved. Now, taking that and using Markov model with enhanced martingale as well filtering the teams with Monte Carlo simulating system for the rest of the season creates a build up and more we advance throughout the season we are left with less possibilities making easier to choose the winners or at least those who won't lose like SD did now and some other teams from the elite group of 8 are doing periodically. I will soon post the plays and you will understand better.
As I mentioned before - only two games were yesterday ones I betted actually as the machine suggestions were from the day before slate and it was my mistake misinterpreting them. Now, since I did bet San Diego and the Yankees games which were first - I went 0-2 with the loss of 3 units with $354 on SD bet and the loss of $110 on the NY Yankees over. Altogether - $464
0
As I mentioned before - only two games were yesterday ones I betted actually as the machine suggestions were from the day before slate and it was my mistake misinterpreting them. Now, since I did bet San Diego and the Yankees games which were first - I went 0-2 with the loss of 3 units with $354 on SD bet and the loss of $110 on the NY Yankees over. Altogether - $464
When I go back and read through all your posts I can’t help but notice on your first journey to double up you played less games. Did you change things from first cycle to second?
It just looks like you’re spread across so many games now compared to being more selective before. I’m curious to hear what you have to say and I’m looking forward to seeing your success.
0
Good luck today Chat.
When I go back and read through all your posts I can’t help but notice on your first journey to double up you played less games. Did you change things from first cycle to second?
It just looks like you’re spread across so many games now compared to being more selective before. I’m curious to hear what you have to say and I’m looking forward to seeing your success.
Good luck today Chat. When I go back and read through all your posts I can’t help but notice on your first journey to double up you played less games. Did you change things from first cycle to second? It just looks like you’re spread across so many games now compared to being more selective before. I’m curious to hear what you have to say and I’m looking forward to seeing your success.
You're absolutely right raceman. And we are looking into this and trying to regain the same momentum basing our bets on basic anomalies created by the tickets and the money and historical data structured and unstructured. I don't have a straight answer as of yet and I am not going to disrespect anyone here by giving half baked explanations, but, be rest assured that our goal is well aligned with our common goal - to get back on track as we did in the first cycle and we will get it done when we figure out if the quantitive betting is the core of the problem. Honestly - I don't think so. I think that along the way we grew exponentially and like you mentioned - spread around way too much. But, all the bets we have for example today are the result of the previous bets and historically induced data surge if I may call that in that name.
Thanks for your ever positive contribution. You will be first to read once we have a conclusive answers to what you just asked.
0
Quote Originally Posted by raceman06:
Good luck today Chat. When I go back and read through all your posts I can’t help but notice on your first journey to double up you played less games. Did you change things from first cycle to second? It just looks like you’re spread across so many games now compared to being more selective before. I’m curious to hear what you have to say and I’m looking forward to seeing your success.
You're absolutely right raceman. And we are looking into this and trying to regain the same momentum basing our bets on basic anomalies created by the tickets and the money and historical data structured and unstructured. I don't have a straight answer as of yet and I am not going to disrespect anyone here by giving half baked explanations, but, be rest assured that our goal is well aligned with our common goal - to get back on track as we did in the first cycle and we will get it done when we figure out if the quantitive betting is the core of the problem. Honestly - I don't think so. I think that along the way we grew exponentially and like you mentioned - spread around way too much. But, all the bets we have for example today are the result of the previous bets and historically induced data surge if I may call that in that name.
Thanks for your ever positive contribution. You will be first to read once we have a conclusive answers to what you just asked.
Game 2 is off course the Red Sox against the Orioles. The Covers modes - this becomes very annoying that the half of the text is posted and another not.
Orioles (BAL) @ Red Sox (BOS) ML 2 BOS ML 3 1.77 -130 $390
0
Quote Originally Posted by ChatBIN:
G2 $390
Game 2 is off course the Red Sox against the Orioles. The Covers modes - this becomes very annoying that the half of the text is posted and another not.
Orioles (BAL) @ Red Sox (BOS) ML 2 BOS ML 3 1.77 -130 $390
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.