Wow..... SF Giants are bad
I guess i wasnt paying attention. Your just using a chase system and you will just keep upping your bets on teams that lose ,like on san fran until they get a win. At some point the amounts could become insane. I have seen teams go on very long losing streaks that could put a bettor in the poor house
Good luck
I guess i wasnt paying attention. Your just using a chase system and you will just keep upping your bets on teams that lose ,like on san fran until they get a win. At some point the amounts could become insane. I have seen teams go on very long losing streaks that could put a bettor in the poor house
Good luck
Sunday: SEA Mariners - TOR Blue Jays Under 8.5 -118 $797 SF Giants ML +120 $1,350 DET Tigers ML -115 $518 NY Mets ML -130 $585
Why was Detroit not on this chasing system yesterday? They won. What is your criteria to determine which team to chase? Last 10 games, injuries, historical records, rivaliry, weather ... etc? Chasing ML in baseball can get pretty crazy with these high juice bets. Maybe just sticks to the over/under pattern bets?
Sunday: SEA Mariners - TOR Blue Jays Under 8.5 -118 $797 SF Giants ML +120 $1,350 DET Tigers ML -115 $518 NY Mets ML -130 $585
Why was Detroit not on this chasing system yesterday? They won. What is your criteria to determine which team to chase? Last 10 games, injuries, historical records, rivaliry, weather ... etc? Chasing ML in baseball can get pretty crazy with these high juice bets. Maybe just sticks to the over/under pattern bets?
If my numbers are correct.
Yesterday 1-6 -$4613
98-115 overall
Current bankroll $6,184-$4,613=$1,571
This is a bankroll after doubling $5K into $10,391 and withdrawing $2,500.
Put back $2,500 + $1,571 = $4,071 so you are currently down $929 for the season with your initial 5k.
Does your $150 unit bet go down to $100 now or remain the same. Do we need to deposit more to cover the chase bets for today since $4,071 would not be enough.
If my numbers are correct.
Yesterday 1-6 -$4613
98-115 overall
Current bankroll $6,184-$4,613=$1,571
This is a bankroll after doubling $5K into $10,391 and withdrawing $2,500.
Put back $2,500 + $1,571 = $4,071 so you are currently down $929 for the season with your initial 5k.
Does your $150 unit bet go down to $100 now or remain the same. Do we need to deposit more to cover the chase bets for today since $4,071 would not be enough.
Monday:
PHI Phillies ML -180 $270
PHI Phillies -1.5 +120 $150
NY Mets ML -166 $249
NY Mets -1.5 +142 $150
WASH Nationals ML +154 $750
1-6 -$4,613
Monday:
PHI Phillies ML -180 $270
PHI Phillies -1.5 +120 $150
NY Mets ML -166 $249
NY Mets -1.5 +142 $150
SF Giants ML +100 $2,025
SEA Mariners - NY Yankees Under 8 -105 $1,418
WASH Nationals ML +154 $750
1-6 -$4,613
98-115 overall
Current bankroll $6,184-$4,613=$1,571
This is a bankroll after doubling $5K into $10,391 and withdrawing $2,500.
Monday:
PHI Phillies ML -180 $270
PHI Phillies -1.5 +120 $150
NY Mets ML -166 $249
NY Mets -1.5 +142 $150
WASH Nationals ML +154 $750
1-6 -$4,613
Monday:
PHI Phillies ML -180 $270
PHI Phillies -1.5 +120 $150
NY Mets ML -166 $249
NY Mets -1.5 +142 $150
SF Giants ML +100 $2,025
SEA Mariners - NY Yankees Under 8 -105 $1,418
WASH Nationals ML +154 $750
1-6 -$4,613
98-115 overall
Current bankroll $6,184-$4,613=$1,571
This is a bankroll after doubling $5K into $10,391 and withdrawing $2,500.
The answer is yes to all what you just said. I already deposited back $2,500 and the unit size will go back to $100
The answer is yes to all what you just said. I already deposited back $2,500 and the unit size will go back to $100
The machine had the Tigers as an underdog. And this is not really a chasing system in its classical form. Right now we are checking and rechecking and I will soon post what are our conclusions and which course will we take - continue from where we left or start from the beginning. Clearly = continuing from where we left doesn't mean we will continue to increase the betting sums on sequences we lost. We have to proceed with the funds we have as a bankroll. Otherwise I could easily deposit another 10K and thrapple up on losses. But that would be first of all not by a protocol move and also will not serve any purpose of development in the sense of R&D. Right now we are sitting down and having discussion as of what path to pursue, one with multiple bankrolls for each system (game, totals, series, anomaly between the tickets and the money, RLM etc. All the systems by protocol what we fed the machine reverse engineered running thru historical data), or increase the bankroll size significantly and reduce the unit size. But, that would be like hitting the panic button and we are not there yet. We are only $929 down from an initial bankroll of $5K as you also know and mentioned. So, lots of coffee, some "I told you so"s and then practical pragmatics applied.
I promise I will come up here with the resolution soon enough to have time to bet. One initial conclusion we came up with is that Monday is not a day to have decisive bets as part of progressive model.
The machine had the Tigers as an underdog. And this is not really a chasing system in its classical form. Right now we are checking and rechecking and I will soon post what are our conclusions and which course will we take - continue from where we left or start from the beginning. Clearly = continuing from where we left doesn't mean we will continue to increase the betting sums on sequences we lost. We have to proceed with the funds we have as a bankroll. Otherwise I could easily deposit another 10K and thrapple up on losses. But that would be first of all not by a protocol move and also will not serve any purpose of development in the sense of R&D. Right now we are sitting down and having discussion as of what path to pursue, one with multiple bankrolls for each system (game, totals, series, anomaly between the tickets and the money, RLM etc. All the systems by protocol what we fed the machine reverse engineered running thru historical data), or increase the bankroll size significantly and reduce the unit size. But, that would be like hitting the panic button and we are not there yet. We are only $929 down from an initial bankroll of $5K as you also know and mentioned. So, lots of coffee, some "I told you so"s and then practical pragmatics applied.
I promise I will come up here with the resolution soon enough to have time to bet. One initial conclusion we came up with is that Monday is not a day to have decisive bets as part of progressive model.
Yeah. I share the sentiment. But, we are only $929 down from our initial bankroll of $5K. And, with lots more experience. So, we will be fine and more than that. That is our goal
Yeah. I share the sentiment. But, we are only $929 down from our initial bankroll of $5K. And, with lots more experience. So, we will be fine and more than that. That is our goal
You need to be there with your numbers and record keeping. Many errors thru out the week. I think post #289 was a winner that was not added to your record/profits.
What was the deal with $1,418 bet for the NYY under bet on post #306
You need to be there with your numbers and record keeping. Many errors thru out the week. I think post #289 was a winner that was not added to your record/profits.
What was the deal with $1,418 bet for the NYY under bet on post #306
As I said before, I am operating with crypto currency and then rounding up for our records here in dollars. Also, another thing is that I am betting NBA playoff games as well and doing pretty well, but using a different portion of a bankroll, but the account is the same. So, it mat be that some winnings here and there are slipping out. As long as it is winnings that slip out it is Ok. As you can already understand me and my colleagues have a joint account - (grad students have their own) - as we don't want to operate multiple accounts from the same or approximate IP's as our accounts will be considered double accounts and will be closed. So, my reports here are as precise as I make them. I can promise you one thing -I will always keep reporting with an integrity.
As I said before, I am operating with crypto currency and then rounding up for our records here in dollars. Also, another thing is that I am betting NBA playoff games as well and doing pretty well, but using a different portion of a bankroll, but the account is the same. So, it mat be that some winnings here and there are slipping out. As long as it is winnings that slip out it is Ok. As you can already understand me and my colleagues have a joint account - (grad students have their own) - as we don't want to operate multiple accounts from the same or approximate IP's as our accounts will be considered double accounts and will be closed. So, my reports here are as precise as I make them. I can promise you one thing -I will always keep reporting with an integrity.
@ALEXSON
You're right about post #289. More or less $398 won and not reported. Regarding the under in Seattle - the Mariners played 4 straight overs before that game while the Yankees played 3 overs prior to the game last night. So, the machine took a deep dive into over. BTW, we already fixed the bug that jumped up the bet size.
$4,079+$398=$4,477
@ALEXSON
You're right about post #289. More or less $398 won and not reported. Regarding the under in Seattle - the Mariners played 4 straight overs before that game while the Yankees played 3 overs prior to the game last night. So, the machine took a deep dive into over. BTW, we already fixed the bug that jumped up the bet size.
$4,079+$398=$4,477
Tuesday:
CLE Guardians - MIL Brewers Over 8.5 -130 $130
TOR Blue Jays - TB Rays Under 8 -132 $132
NY Mets - PIT Pirates Over 7.5 -130 $130
SEA Mariners - NY Yankees Under 8.5 -130 $390
WASH Nationals ML +180 $100
WASH Nationals +1.5 -110 $110
NY Yankees ML -139 $139
DET Tigers ML -110 $110
Tuesday:
CLE Guardians - MIL Brewers Over 8.5 -130 $130
TOR Blue Jays - TB Rays Under 8 -132 $132
NY Mets - PIT Pirates Over 7.5 -130 $130
SEA Mariners - NY Yankees Under 8.5 -130 $390
WASH Nationals ML +180 $100
WASH Nationals +1.5 -110 $110
NY Yankees ML -139 $139
DET Tigers ML -110 $110
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.