Posted:
#1
What a brutal series in Cleveland . . . three walkoffs and Felix gets his ass handed to him on Sunday afternoon . . . that being said, those other three games are a perfect of example of unpredictable things happening during a baseball game. Anyone claiming "great call" for backing the Indians on Monday is just as much of a fool as someone claiming the same thing about the Indians RL play on Friday night. Luck, and lack thereof, plays a huge role in tight games. And "luck" is almost impossible to predict.
Thus you can't let it control too much your thinking as you move forward, the Indians aren't as "great" as they looked this weekend, and the Mariners aren't as "horrible" as they looked. In general, I do believe that "better" teams will have more opportunities to take advantage of good luck than "bad" teams will though. And Bad teams will have more chances to be hurt by bad luck.
On to Tonight . . . How does one justify backing the Halos at -150? Other than thinking the Mariners will have a horrible hang over from their series in Cleveland? Is williams that much better than harang? Have the Angels played that much better than Seattle?
Thus you can't let it control too much your thinking as you move forward, the Indians aren't as "great" as they looked this weekend, and the Mariners aren't as "horrible" as they looked. In general, I do believe that "better" teams will have more opportunities to take advantage of good luck than "bad" teams will though. And Bad teams will have more chances to be hurt by bad luck.
On to Tonight . . . How does one justify backing the Halos at -150? Other than thinking the Mariners will have a horrible hang over from their series in Cleveland? Is williams that much better than harang? Have the Angels played that much better than Seattle?
0
Hot Forum Topics
