So you ask me a question, to which I gave you a reply with my reasoning and more explanation. You disagree with my answer and therefore decide the discussion is worthless.
We disagree and will continue to disagree, that is what makes the exchange worthless. As for the Artie Lange / Joe Buck discussion, the actions of another do not justify your own. I could have ripped Joe Buck to shreds without a single dirty word and left him feeling castrated.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hog_Wild:
So you ask me a question, to which I gave you a reply with my reasoning and more explanation. You disagree with my answer and therefore decide the discussion is worthless.
We disagree and will continue to disagree, that is what makes the exchange worthless. As for the Artie Lange / Joe Buck discussion, the actions of another do not justify your own. I could have ripped Joe Buck to shreds without a single dirty word and left him feeling castrated.
We disagree and will continue to disagree, that is what makes the exchange worthless. As for the Artie Lange / Joe Buck discussion, the actions of another do not justify your own. I could have ripped Joe Buck to shreds without a single dirty word and left him feeling castrated.
No need for me to justify my actions Key, as I have no issue with them, although I wouldn't use that language had I been speaking driectly to the kids.
So if someone doesn't agree with you, any discussion/ debate is deemed "worthless" by you? Seems you have a rather self-verification theory on people that don't see things your way.
It's rather ironic that the future leaders of our Country are chosen somewhat based on debates, which is what people with conflicting views tend to do rather than tell the others that don't agree with them that any further discussion is "worthless"
Remember, I didn't come into your Thread to engage a discussion with you. You came into BayArea's Thread where most were in agreement about Joe Bucks talents- or lack thereof- and chose to start a discussion with me, or so I thought, since you were asking for my thoughts.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
We disagree and will continue to disagree, that is what makes the exchange worthless. As for the Artie Lange / Joe Buck discussion, the actions of another do not justify your own. I could have ripped Joe Buck to shreds without a single dirty word and left him feeling castrated.
No need for me to justify my actions Key, as I have no issue with them, although I wouldn't use that language had I been speaking driectly to the kids.
So if someone doesn't agree with you, any discussion/ debate is deemed "worthless" by you? Seems you have a rather self-verification theory on people that don't see things your way.
It's rather ironic that the future leaders of our Country are chosen somewhat based on debates, which is what people with conflicting views tend to do rather than tell the others that don't agree with them that any further discussion is "worthless"
Remember, I didn't come into your Thread to engage a discussion with you. You came into BayArea's Thread where most were in agreement about Joe Bucks talents- or lack thereof- and chose to start a discussion with me, or so I thought, since you were asking for my thoughts.
Hot Forum Topics
