I'm glad I was in the basement cause I actually screamed " FUCK YOU" when he hit Cano in the 9th ! What fuckheads Scioscia and Fuentes are !!
They tried their best to make me consider never betting BIG money on sports again.
![]()
They tried their best to make me consider never betting BIG money on sports again.
![]()
QUOTE Originally Posted by crazy1464:
ANOTHER WINNER FOR ME YANKEES. KEEP POSTING KING YOUR A LOSER! YOU MAKE ME ALOT MONEY! AND YOUR OTHER BUDDY MAYDAY! BOTH LOSERS!
Now that is some funny shit. People who aren't familiar with the Early Celebration phenomenon always find out the hard way. Dumbass.
QUOTE Originally Posted by crazy1464:
ANOTHER WINNER FOR ME YANKEES. KEEP POSTING KING YOUR A LOSER! YOU MAKE ME ALOT MONEY! AND YOUR OTHER BUDDY MAYDAY! BOTH LOSERS!
Now that is some funny shit. People who aren't familiar with the Early Celebration phenomenon always find out the hard way. Dumbass.
Nice call King!! ![]()
In all seriousness....would you consider last night's bet on LA a "situational bet"??
I was just going by the line.
Nice call King!! ![]()
In all seriousness....would you consider last night's bet on LA a "situational bet"??
I was just going by the line.
I was just going by the line.
I was just going by the line.
C'mon.......the same could have been said should the Yankees have won......are you telling me LA played and managed a perfect game yesterday?
C'mon.......the same could have been said should the Yankees have won......are you telling me LA played and managed a perfect game yesterday?
"Just going by the line" you say. ![]()
So Vegas played a mind game by opening the line with LAA favored knowing the public would jump all over NY in a close out game?
I'm just trying to pick your brain here a little if you don't mind. I need to change the way I see this shit.
![]()
"Just going by the line" you say. ![]()
So Vegas played a mind game by opening the line with LAA favored knowing the public would jump all over NY in a close out game?
I'm just trying to pick your brain here a little if you don't mind. I need to change the way I see this shit.
![]()
C'mon.......the same could have been said should the Yankees have won......are you telling me LA played and managed a perfect game yesterday?
C'mon.......the same could have been said should the Yankees have won......are you telling me LA played and managed a perfect game yesterday?
Fine......I didn't say Girardi managed well.........BUT, do you think bringing in Fuentes rather than closing with Weaver who already had a very solid 8th under his belt was wise? Do you think that a relatively early pull of Lackey was smart? Personally, I wasn't a fan of either of those moves.
To be fair to Girardi, Burnett had pitched pretty well after the first....it wasn't like he was getting killed out there.
Fine......I didn't say Girardi managed well.........BUT, do you think bringing in Fuentes rather than closing with Weaver who already had a very solid 8th under his belt was wise? Do you think that a relatively early pull of Lackey was smart? Personally, I wasn't a fan of either of those moves.
To be fair to Girardi, Burnett had pitched pretty well after the first....it wasn't like he was getting killed out there.
Fine......I didn't say Girardi managed well.........BUT, do you think bringing in Fuentes rather than closing with Weaver who already had a very solid 8th under his belt was wise? Do you think that a relatively early pull of Lackey was smart? Personally, I wasn't a fan of either of those moves.
To be fair to Girardi, Burnett had pitched pretty well after the first....it wasn't like he was getting killed out there.
Fine......I didn't say Girardi managed well.........BUT, do you think bringing in Fuentes rather than closing with Weaver who already had a very solid 8th under his belt was wise? Do you think that a relatively early pull of Lackey was smart? Personally, I wasn't a fan of either of those moves.
To be fair to Girardi, Burnett had pitched pretty well after the first....it wasn't like he was getting killed out there.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.