All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

Is WEBB n SANTANA The Closest Thing 2 Lock?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1127
Posts: 40
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 254
Posted: #1
How the fvk is johan gonna loose to this team? Team probably disgusted after last nights shit show. Pads best 2 hitters are lefty... and Webb vs pirates ... gotta take it..
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 9674
Posted: #2
good luck

i have them both parlayed ML and RL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60088
Posted: #3
Good Luck.
 
I will be watching this system closely.
 
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 254
Posted: #4
vanzack what are ur thoughts?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 13519
Posted: #5
Pirates
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 24208
Posted: #6
Both team teams suck on the road and you're laying BIG juice.
 
 
 
 
 
 
There is no 100% cappers in the world
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 15378
Posted: #7
 
 
Diamondbacks are not hitting the ball.....U should be ok with Santana but I would have to say no play on the D-backs
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2378
Posted: #8
You should be okay with Webb but there is no way I would lay juice on Santana...He is not who he used to be.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 3355
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by jordan43:

How the fvk is johan gonna loose to this team? Team probably disgusted after last nights shit show. Pads best 2 hitters are lefty... and Webb vs pirates ... gotta take it..

Nothing in sports betting is a sure thing  GL today

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 11688
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by jordan43:

How the fvk is johan gonna loose to this team?
 
by giving up more runs then his team scores
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 15378
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by nccashman:

You should be okay with Webb but there is no way I would lay juice on Santana...He is not who he used to be.

Hmmmmmm....I dont know why people keep saying that....He starts off slow every year....He is 7-3 with a 3.2 era

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 29
Posted: #12
I'm taking the under on Az/Pitt.
Snell has been a way better pitcher at home.
DBacks have been horrible on the road as of late.
DBACKS seem like a better bet than Mets.
History says the DBACKS own the Pirates.

Pads are streaking (2 in a row).
Seriously, though, pitching is contagious. This could be another under.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2378
Posted: #13
I have watched him pitch. He is not the same. Once again the Mets, in trying to keep up with the Yanks, have paid way too much for an athlete that is way past his prime. Met/Yank fans should just start cheering for the Liberty.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 15378
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by nccashman:

I have watched him pitch. He is not the same. Once again the Mets, in trying to keep up with the Yanks, have paid way too much for an athlete that is way past his prime. Met/Yank fans should just start cheering for the Liberty.

 

He is 29 years old

  G GS W L SV CG SHO IP H R ER HR BB K ERA WHIP BAA  
.209

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2378
Posted: #15
Another day with Papi on my nuts.  Okay so you love Santana and I don't. No problem. I have watched him pitch and he is nothing spectacular.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2005
Posts: 12670
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by nccashman:

 Met/Yank fans should just start cheering for the Liberty.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 15378
Posted: #17
 
What I tried to paste was this
 
                        
Pre All-star   50-30   3.55 ERA
Post            50-17  2.79 ERA 
 
 
He is arguably the best pitcher in the game...At 29 How in the hell is he past his prime ? You act like you are the only person in this forum that has seen him pitch.....
 
I am not saying the Mets are a lock but why in the world would you back a good pitcher in Webb on the road with a team that is hitting like shit versus a team that can actually hit the ball at times...On the other hand you have a good pitcher in Santana with some good bats behind him that Kill lefties  versus a team in the Padres that are not a very good team.....The Padres scored 1 run off of   Mike Pelfrey.....
 
Webb can shut down the Pirates by himself and the D-backs may win but how is Santana not a better bet tonight ?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 2918
Posted: #18
Santana has been nothing spectacular, but neither has the Padres anemic offense, i know last year lefties hit Santana better than righties, don't know if the same holds true this year. But avoid Gonzales and put a minimum of 2 runs on the board and that should get the job done. But then again these are the type of pitchers shitty offense do well against whenever I bet, so who knows
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 15378
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by nccashman:

Another day with Papi on my nuts.  Okay so you love Santana and I don't. No problem. I have watched him pitch and he is nothing spectacular.

 

Point proven from yesterday....U love getting into the middle of stuff

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2378
Posted: #20
Papi, Teams seem to come out of their hitting slumps when they face the Pirates. Also, Wolf has pitched well at home. Snell is average at best. So I would definitely say that the better of the two bets would be to lay the juice on Webb. My objective in the NY/SD series was to make money on the under. Well, I did that last night. So I am not really interested in that series anyway. But for those that make absurd comments about Johan being a lock  I have to step in and put up the road block.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2378
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by Papi_4_MVP:

 

Point proven from yesterday....U love getting into the middle of stuff

What is it that the say? The pot calling the kettle black?

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 14764
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by jordan43:

How the fvk is johan gonna loose to this team? Team probably disgusted after last nights shit show. Pads best 2 hitters are lefty... and Webb vs pirates ... gotta take it..

It is so obvious you are intending to load up huge on both plays so you asked the question is this the closest thing to a "L". I just can't write out the dreaded "L" word...lol

First of all there is no such thing as a closest thing to a "L". Secondly if you load up and end up losing can you wager huge again several times more to break even or get your losses back with some gains? If not then you are really wagering way over your head and your pocket book and this is how gamblers end up in the dumps. Even if you win that is not good because now you are going to develop a bad habit and will do it again and of course eventually you will get severely burned. Now if you are not intending to wager real huge way over your head and pocket book then go ahead and do what you want to do, if you lose so what it won't be devastating losses you can easily get those losses back at a later time.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 15378
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by nccashman:

Papi, Teams seem to come out of their hitting slumps when they face the Pirates. Also, Wolf has pitched well at home. Snell is average at best. So I would definitely say that the better of the two bets would be to lay the juice on Webb. My objective in the NY/SD series was to make money on the under. Well, I did that last night. So I am not really interested in that series anyway. But for those that make absurd comments about Johan being a lock  I have to step in and put up the road block.

 

See there you go being a dumb ass...Dont twist my words around....Read again what I wrote, and then scroll back up and look at my first post and see what comes after that....

I had the Padres first 5 and for the game last night.....

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2378
Posted: #24
 SirJohnDrake...thanks for the support
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 2596
Posted: #25
Mets are 9-1 last 10 when Santana is on the mound
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.