Was meaning to post this before the game but did not have time. Dan Iassogna is from southern CT, 95%+ chance he is a Yankees fan and ironically his numbers/Yankees numbers in game that he is the home plate ump back up that he probably has a bias for the Yankees, while umping.
For example, the Yankees have been a very good team in Yankees
Stadium(s) over the past 10 years: 522-287 for a 0.645 win percentage.
Iassogna has worked 14 games behind the plate at Yankee Stadium(s) in
that time frame. The Yankees have lost 1 of those games. Just to
clarify, the Yankees have gone 13-1 (0.929) in games Iassogna has been
the plate umpire in Yankee Stadium. The probability of observing data
this extreme is 5%.
36 umpires have had home plate at least 10 times in Yankee Stadium over
the past 10 years. The Yankees have had the highest win pct in front
of Dan Iassogna. But they have performed similarly in front of a small
number of other umps. Here is a list of Yankee win-loss records in
Yankee Stadium for some umpires:
Dan Iassogna 13-1
Gary Cederstrom 12-1
Bill Welke 11-1
Bruce Froemming 10-1
Here are a list of the four guys on the other end of the distribution
Hunter Wendelstedt 4-7
Mike Everett 6-7
Mark Wegner 7-8
Angel Hernandez 7-6
So to summarize, the Yankees were roughly a 0.645 team at Yankee stadium
over the last 10 years. The Yankees were a combined 24-28 when the
four most "generous" umps to the opposition were working. That is a
0.462 win percentage. Significantly lower than 0.645 for sure, but that
would be expected since we sampled the four most extreme. For those
who like p-values, that would be a 0.007 chance.
Now, what about our original four who seem to be "generous" to the
Yankees at home. The Yankees were a combined 46-4 when they worked, an
unheard of win percentage of 0.920. That's a p-value of 0.0003.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Was meaning to post this before the game but did not have time. Dan Iassogna is from southern CT, 95%+ chance he is a Yankees fan and ironically his numbers/Yankees numbers in game that he is the home plate ump back up that he probably has a bias for the Yankees, while umping.
For example, the Yankees have been a very good team in Yankees
Stadium(s) over the past 10 years: 522-287 for a 0.645 win percentage.
Iassogna has worked 14 games behind the plate at Yankee Stadium(s) in
that time frame. The Yankees have lost 1 of those games. Just to
clarify, the Yankees have gone 13-1 (0.929) in games Iassogna has been
the plate umpire in Yankee Stadium. The probability of observing data
this extreme is 5%.
36 umpires have had home plate at least 10 times in Yankee Stadium over
the past 10 years. The Yankees have had the highest win pct in front
of Dan Iassogna. But they have performed similarly in front of a small
number of other umps. Here is a list of Yankee win-loss records in
Yankee Stadium for some umpires:
Dan Iassogna 13-1
Gary Cederstrom 12-1
Bill Welke 11-1
Bruce Froemming 10-1
Here are a list of the four guys on the other end of the distribution
Hunter Wendelstedt 4-7
Mike Everett 6-7
Mark Wegner 7-8
Angel Hernandez 7-6
So to summarize, the Yankees were roughly a 0.645 team at Yankee stadium
over the last 10 years. The Yankees were a combined 24-28 when the
four most "generous" umps to the opposition were working. That is a
0.462 win percentage. Significantly lower than 0.645 for sure, but that
would be expected since we sampled the four most extreme. For those
who like p-values, that would be a 0.007 chance.
Now, what about our original four who seem to be "generous" to the
Yankees at home. The Yankees were a combined 46-4 when they worked, an
unheard of win percentage of 0.920. That's a p-value of 0.0003.
If you knew anything about CT you would understand that the state is split right down the middle of Yankees and Red Sox fans with some Mets fans sprinkled amongst.
You would be extremely hard pressed to find a Red Sox fan in Fairfield county (where Iassogna grew up and is from). Everyone there is Yankee fans (generalization). It has to due with the fact that people from NYC moved to southern CT to get out of NYC but still be a 30 minute car or train ride to get back into the city.
Iassogna is from Bridgeport, CT. I would bet my life savings, and feel comfortable, that he grew up a Yankee fan and is a Yankee fan. For you to think umps are not fans of certain teams is being naive.
0
If you knew anything about CT you would understand that the state is split right down the middle of Yankees and Red Sox fans with some Mets fans sprinkled amongst.
You would be extremely hard pressed to find a Red Sox fan in Fairfield county (where Iassogna grew up and is from). Everyone there is Yankee fans (generalization). It has to due with the fact that people from NYC moved to southern CT to get out of NYC but still be a 30 minute car or train ride to get back into the city.
Iassogna is from Bridgeport, CT. I would bet my life savings, and feel comfortable, that he grew up a Yankee fan and is a Yankee fan. For you to think umps are not fans of certain teams is being naive.
14-1 in home games that Iassogna is the home plate ump.
So what? The Yankees are always one of the best teams in the MLB and are always good at home. 14-1 isn't that out of the question no matter who is umpire.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpero:
The Yankees are now
14-1 in home games that Iassogna is the home plate ump.
So what? The Yankees are always one of the best teams in the MLB and are always good at home. 14-1 isn't that out of the question no matter who is umpire.
Dan Iassogna is from southern CT, 95%+ chance he is a Yankees fan
Lmao. You do understand that umpires get graded at the end of every game don't you.
If there was an obvious bias with obvious blown calls, it would certainly show up.
No offense, but did you watch the game?
In the last 2 innings, the calls he was making behind home plate warrant an investigation alone. His strike zone for Yankee relief pitching (which has been obviuosly struggling) was embarrassing to say the least. The outside corner grew by 9 to 12 inches. Seriously, it was a joke.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EIGHTYpercent:
Dan Iassogna is from southern CT, 95%+ chance he is a Yankees fan
Lmao. You do understand that umpires get graded at the end of every game don't you.
If there was an obvious bias with obvious blown calls, it would certainly show up.
No offense, but did you watch the game?
In the last 2 innings, the calls he was making behind home plate warrant an investigation alone. His strike zone for Yankee relief pitching (which has been obviuosly struggling) was embarrassing to say the least. The outside corner grew by 9 to 12 inches. Seriously, it was a joke.
They have a home record of .645 at home over the past 10 years.
A win percentage of .933 when Iassogna umps is an extreme statistically, especially when his record for home teams when umping is 211-179 for a win percentage of .541.
0
Read the first post.
They have a home record of .645 at home over the past 10 years.
A win percentage of .933 when Iassogna umps is an extreme statistically, especially when his record for home teams when umping is 211-179 for a win percentage of .541.
In the last 2 innings, the calls he was making behind home plate warrant an investigation alone. His strike zone for Yankee relief pitching (which has been obviuosly struggling) was embarrassing to say the least. The outside corner grew by 9 to 12 inches. Seriously, it was a joke.
So you mean the 1st strike called on Sizemore in the 8th that was a ball but he called a strike?
Same exact pitch as ball 2 yet was called a strike the next pitch. God forbid he have hte count go to 3-0 with the tying run up to bat.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PINNACLE:
No offense, but did you watch the game?
In the last 2 innings, the calls he was making behind home plate warrant an investigation alone. His strike zone for Yankee relief pitching (which has been obviuosly struggling) was embarrassing to say the least. The outside corner grew by 9 to 12 inches. Seriously, it was a joke.
So you mean the 1st strike called on Sizemore in the 8th that was a ball but he called a strike?
Same exact pitch as ball 2 yet was called a strike the next pitch. God forbid he have hte count go to 3-0 with the tying run up to bat.
15 games isnt enough and he prob likes his job, money, family, life more than he likes the yankees
Yes its a small sample size but based on the games he has umped it is quite odd that the Yankees have hte highest win percentage of any ump when Iassogna is umping at Yankee stadium.
A 93% win percentage vs. a 54% win percentage overall for home teams when he umps.
It raises questions especially since he is most likely a Yankee fan.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JulesWinfield:
15 games isnt enough and he prob likes his job, money, family, life more than he likes the yankees
Yes its a small sample size but based on the games he has umped it is quite odd that the Yankees have hte highest win percentage of any ump when Iassogna is umping at Yankee stadium.
A 93% win percentage vs. a 54% win percentage overall for home teams when he umps.
It raises questions especially since he is most likely a Yankee fan.
now matter what the truth is, its good info, we don't bet on if the umps calling a fair game or not or where he is from, the proof is in the W /L record and thats what matters, any edge we can get from each other on here is what it's all about so
thank you jpero
0
now matter what the truth is, its good info, we don't bet on if the umps calling a fair game or not or where he is from, the proof is in the W /L record and thats what matters, any edge we can get from each other on here is what it's all about so
Home Plate Umpires should always be one of the first things you look at when handicapping a game. Plenty of MLB teams have past histories, both good and bad, with different Umpires. Anybody who believes all Umpires are always impartial is a very naive person.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Home Plate Umpires should always be one of the first things you look at when handicapping a game. Plenty of MLB teams have past histories, both good and bad, with different Umpires. Anybody who believes all Umpires are always impartial is a very naive person.
Don't know why there is so much hate for this thread. I thought this was some some outstanding information,
much thanks jpero
Hate? So simply disagreeing with someone is hating them? Hmm, I guess I can't give my opinion on anything anymore because I'm "hating" people just by disagreeing....according to you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jim_Tressel:
Don't know why there is so much hate for this thread. I thought this was some some outstanding information,
much thanks jpero
Hate? So simply disagreeing with someone is hating them? Hmm, I guess I can't give my opinion on anything anymore because I'm "hating" people just by disagreeing....according to you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.