let me guess...online poker TODAY is fixed too huh lol how about you actually show some proof to support your ridiculous claims...yes some games have been fixed back in the day..especially in boxing!! but this aint back in the day...and we aint betting on boxing =P
wasn't a NBA ref put in jail for fixing games recently??
let me guess...online poker TODAY is fixed too huh lol how about you actually show some proof to support your ridiculous claims...yes some games have been fixed back in the day..especially in boxing!! but this aint back in the day...and we aint betting on boxing =P
wasn't a NBA ref put in jail for fixing games recently??
Doc Rivers probably put 1 million on the Wizards +6.5, then said "I'm gonna rest my starters", so the line goes to Celtics -1 in like 10 mins. big payday for Mr. Rivers
ok iam done with you after reading this post lol...this proves how fucking stupid you are....this is by far the dumbest post ive seen since joining covers......and about the ref...yeah...that was 4+ years ago...get over it..he got locked up over it..how many more guys are gonna take risks like that after someone gets caught...think stupid!!! lol..and if you think games are fixed then why the fuck you even in this thread and betting sports?????????????
Doc Rivers probably put 1 million on the Wizards +6.5, then said "I'm gonna rest my starters", so the line goes to Celtics -1 in like 10 mins. big payday for Mr. Rivers
ok iam done with you after reading this post lol...this proves how fucking stupid you are....this is by far the dumbest post ive seen since joining covers......and about the ref...yeah...that was 4+ years ago...get over it..he got locked up over it..how many more guys are gonna take risks like that after someone gets caught...think stupid!!! lol..and if you think games are fixed then why the fuck you even in this thread and betting sports?????????????
morons need to understand that the books win no matter who covers what line..this is why there is a juice and line movement...to get even betting on both sides...thus making no reason for vegas to fix a game...hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
morons need to understand that the books win no matter who covers what line..this is why there is a juice and line movement...to get even betting on both sides...thus making no reason for vegas to fix a game...hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
morons need to understand that the books win no matter who covers what line..this is why there is a juice and line movement...to get even betting on both sides...thus making no reason for vegas to fix a game...hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
get a clue.....!!!! For example, what if 100 million is put on Texas Rangers, and 1 million is bet on Detroit? the books would lose a ton if texas wins
morons need to understand that the books win no matter who covers what line..this is why there is a juice and line movement...to get even betting on both sides...thus making no reason for vegas to fix a game...hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
get a clue.....!!!! For example, what if 100 million is put on Texas Rangers, and 1 million is bet on Detroit? the books would lose a ton if texas wins
and everyone has "flu-like symptoms" when it's 40 degrees outside, so why did AROD take the game off? Plus, the ump was squeezing CC the whole game, and Beckett was getting strikes on pitches 5 inches off the plate.
and everyone has "flu-like symptoms" when it's 40 degrees outside, so why did AROD take the game off? Plus, the ump was squeezing CC the whole game, and Beckett was getting strikes on pitches 5 inches off the plate.
get a clue.....!!!! For example, what if 100 million is put on Texas Rangers, and 1 million is bet on Detroit? the books would lose a ton if texas wins
dude...get a fucking brain!!!! 100 million on tex..and 1 on det...that will never happen!!!!!!!...learn about line movement...the lines move to even the money out and prevent a situation like that...learn to read too...cuz you missed that in my post...and no...the mob has nothing to do with it lol
get a clue.....!!!! For example, what if 100 million is put on Texas Rangers, and 1 million is bet on Detroit? the books would lose a ton if texas wins
dude...get a fucking brain!!!! 100 million on tex..and 1 on det...that will never happen!!!!!!!...learn about line movement...the lines move to even the money out and prevent a situation like that...learn to read too...cuz you missed that in my post...and no...the mob has nothing to do with it lol
get a clue.....!!!! For example, what if 100 million is put on Texas Rangers, and 1 million is bet on Detroit? the books would lose a ton if texas wins
so ... you think the books are a bunch of retards, see the action come in and go ... "oh shit, we really need the rangers."
or do you think they're very fucking smart. move lines, get people betting the other way and if that doesn't work, call some off?
get a clue.....!!!! For example, what if 100 million is put on Texas Rangers, and 1 million is bet on Detroit? the books would lose a ton if texas wins
so ... you think the books are a bunch of retards, see the action come in and go ... "oh shit, we really need the rangers."
or do you think they're very fucking smart. move lines, get people betting the other way and if that doesn't work, call some off?
wow almost 30,000 views but bodio has no clue what hes doing
luv it again
He just has a winning record, which works for me. Plus he backs up his picks with explanations which is in itself more than 99% of the the posters around here would do.
wow almost 30,000 views but bodio has no clue what hes doing
luv it again
He just has a winning record, which works for me. Plus he backs up his picks with explanations which is in itself more than 99% of the the posters around here would do.
dude...get a fucking brain!!!! 100 million on tex..and 1 on det...that will never happen!!!!!!!...learn about line movement...the lines move to even the money out and prevent a situation like that...learn to read too...cuz you missed that in my post...and no...the mob has nothing to do with it lol
dude...get a fucking brain!!!! 100 million on tex..and 1 on det...that will never happen!!!!!!!...learn about line movement...the lines move to even the money out and prevent a situation like that...learn to read too...cuz you missed that in my post...and no...the mob has nothing to do with it lol
let me guess...online poker TODAY is fixed too huh lol how about you actually show some proof to support your ridiculous claims...yes some games have been fixed back in the day..especially in boxing!! but this aint back in the day...and we aint betting on boxing =P
There's a much higher probability of online poker being fixed than a MLB baseball game.... move on.
There is no fix, it's a pigment of people's imagination.
let me guess...online poker TODAY is fixed too huh lol how about you actually show some proof to support your ridiculous claims...yes some games have been fixed back in the day..especially in boxing!! but this aint back in the day...and we aint betting on boxing =P
There's a much higher probability of online poker being fixed than a MLB baseball game.... move on.
There is no fix, it's a pigment of people's imagination.
Look at the difference that Holliday has made to this Cardinals lineup. Since he came back, the Cards have averaged 12.5 hpg and 7 rpg scored. Why is this important? Well, because to me Galarraga is one of the worst starting pitchers in the league. Last year, his ERA was 4.49. When you look closer, his FIP was 5.09 (one of the worst in all majors) with an xFIP of 5.20. As you can see, his E-F is -.60, which was 20th highest to the negative last year. Add in the fact that his BABIP was a very lucky .261 (#14th luckiest) and we have a pitcher that is ready to regress further from his mediocre stats last year. Some will see that Armando got a win in his first start this year. But the fact that he gave up 2 HR's and only 33% of his outs were GB's is definitely a concern for his future starts. I don't really expect him to last past the 6th in this one, and then the 'stellar' 'Zona BP should step in. (They have an ERA of 7.5 and WHIP of 1.7 in 12 home-innings pitched this year)
Carpenter is Cards' best pitcher. He has allowed only 3 ER's this year in 13 innings with a 5 to 1 K/BB ratio in 2 starts this season. He is 4-0 against Arizona lifetime with an ERA of 2.58. I expect him to be solid again tonight.
Bottom line is that we have a #1 pitcher going up against a #5 in this one. I know Cards are on the road here, but even so, I expect them to get a comfortable win in this one. I have this one at -185 Cards, so to me there is defiinitely 'value' at -140.
#2: OVER 8 OAK/CHW (+107)
Cahill is a prime candidate for 'regression' this year, as he had the luckiest BABIP of .236 in 2010 and the 5th highest E-F to the negative of -1.21 (ERA of 2.97 but FIP of 4.19). That being said he has had success against the Sox in the past, with a 3.34 EAR in his 5 starts against them. This is a 'slightly' different lineup though. In 7 games against righty starters this year, White Sox are averaging 6.7 rpg and .350 OBP with 9 HR's. In addition, Adam Dunn is expected to start today after recovering from an apendectomy. Factor in that Cahill got a bit contract extension on Monday, and I expect him to give up a few runs in this one.
Edwin Jackson has had a spectacular start to his season so far but consistency has always been an issue with him. What else is interesting is that the current Athletics lineup is averaging .337 off him with an OBP of .400 and OPS close to .900. Now that's all good, but this is not why I'm making this OVER play tonight.
The real reason for this play is an interesting trend from 2010 in games involving Edwin Jackson. In games following an outing where he threw 110+ pitches, Jackson's games have averaged 10.78 runs per game. Now, I know there are a ton of other factors involed in those games, but it's still an interesting trend. Here's the breakdown:
#1: L 8-2 (10) #2: W 5-4 (9) #3: W 8-0 (8) #4: L 7-4 (11) #5: W 12-5 (17) #6: W 6-5 (11) #7: L 7-5 (12) #8: W 8-5 (13) #9: W 5-1 (6)
There were 9 such occurences last year and if we use 8 as an O/U, we would have gone 7-1-1. Well, Jackson threw 119 pitches in his last start. This trend is officially in play.
Good luck!
_________________ '10 MLBP: 20 - 8 @ 71% for +$13,130 '10 NFL: 58-44 @ 57% for +$9,600 '10 NFLP: 8-2 @ 80% for +$5,800 '10 CFB: 55-54 @ 51% for -$4,400 '10 CFBP: 4-4 @ 50% for -$400 '10 CBB: 39-18 @ 68% for +$19,200 '10 CBBP: 16-6 @ 73% for +$9,400
-------------------------------------------------------------- 'TOTAL: 200-136 @ 60% for +$52,330
"A dollar won is twice as sweet as a dollar earned."
Look at the difference that Holliday has made to this Cardinals lineup. Since he came back, the Cards have averaged 12.5 hpg and 7 rpg scored. Why is this important? Well, because to me Galarraga is one of the worst starting pitchers in the league. Last year, his ERA was 4.49. When you look closer, his FIP was 5.09 (one of the worst in all majors) with an xFIP of 5.20. As you can see, his E-F is -.60, which was 20th highest to the negative last year. Add in the fact that his BABIP was a very lucky .261 (#14th luckiest) and we have a pitcher that is ready to regress further from his mediocre stats last year. Some will see that Armando got a win in his first start this year. But the fact that he gave up 2 HR's and only 33% of his outs were GB's is definitely a concern for his future starts. I don't really expect him to last past the 6th in this one, and then the 'stellar' 'Zona BP should step in. (They have an ERA of 7.5 and WHIP of 1.7 in 12 home-innings pitched this year)
Carpenter is Cards' best pitcher. He has allowed only 3 ER's this year in 13 innings with a 5 to 1 K/BB ratio in 2 starts this season. He is 4-0 against Arizona lifetime with an ERA of 2.58. I expect him to be solid again tonight.
Bottom line is that we have a #1 pitcher going up against a #5 in this one. I know Cards are on the road here, but even so, I expect them to get a comfortable win in this one. I have this one at -185 Cards, so to me there is defiinitely 'value' at -140.
#2: OVER 8 OAK/CHW (+107)
Cahill is a prime candidate for 'regression' this year, as he had the luckiest BABIP of .236 in 2010 and the 5th highest E-F to the negative of -1.21 (ERA of 2.97 but FIP of 4.19). That being said he has had success against the Sox in the past, with a 3.34 EAR in his 5 starts against them. This is a 'slightly' different lineup though. In 7 games against righty starters this year, White Sox are averaging 6.7 rpg and .350 OBP with 9 HR's. In addition, Adam Dunn is expected to start today after recovering from an apendectomy. Factor in that Cahill got a bit contract extension on Monday, and I expect him to give up a few runs in this one.
Edwin Jackson has had a spectacular start to his season so far but consistency has always been an issue with him. What else is interesting is that the current Athletics lineup is averaging .337 off him with an OBP of .400 and OPS close to .900. Now that's all good, but this is not why I'm making this OVER play tonight.
The real reason for this play is an interesting trend from 2010 in games involving Edwin Jackson. In games following an outing where he threw 110+ pitches, Jackson's games have averaged 10.78 runs per game. Now, I know there are a ton of other factors involed in those games, but it's still an interesting trend. Here's the breakdown:
#1: L 8-2 (10) #2: W 5-4 (9) #3: W 8-0 (8) #4: L 7-4 (11) #5: W 12-5 (17) #6: W 6-5 (11) #7: L 7-5 (12) #8: W 8-5 (13) #9: W 5-1 (6)
There were 9 such occurences last year and if we use 8 as an O/U, we would have gone 7-1-1. Well, Jackson threw 119 pitches in his last start. This trend is officially in play.
Good luck!
_________________ '10 MLBP: 20 - 8 @ 71% for +$13,130 '10 NFL: 58-44 @ 57% for +$9,600 '10 NFLP: 8-2 @ 80% for +$5,800 '10 CFB: 55-54 @ 51% for -$4,400 '10 CFBP: 4-4 @ 50% for -$400 '10 CBB: 39-18 @ 68% for +$19,200 '10 CBBP: 16-6 @ 73% for +$9,400
-------------------------------------------------------------- 'TOTAL: 200-136 @ 60% for +$52,330
"A dollar won is twice as sweet as a dollar earned."
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.