DET rl -1.5 +175
Possibly found another rare OVER play here.
Cubs at Marlins. C. Killian vs E. Cabrera.
Mr. Killian is a call up from AAA ball due to an injury to Jameson Taillon. He sports a 7.15 ERA in his AAA season and a 2.03 WHIP. Not good at all.
Mr. Cabrera has had a rough season to this date.
The right-hander currently holds a 4.91 ERA and a 1.77 WHIP with a questionable 24:20 K:BB through 22 innings.
The line says the books see this as a close game. If that is the case, it will be a close game with a lot of runs as both of these guys have holes in their games.
And, the cherry on top. The books have juiced the OVER heavily. They expect scoring. Just a bit sus that the total is only 8.5 but that's ok.
Chicago Cubs/Miami Marlins OVER 8.5 -125 for 3 units.
Possibly found another rare OVER play here.
Cubs at Marlins. C. Killian vs E. Cabrera.
Mr. Killian is a call up from AAA ball due to an injury to Jameson Taillon. He sports a 7.15 ERA in his AAA season and a 2.03 WHIP. Not good at all.
Mr. Cabrera has had a rough season to this date.
The right-hander currently holds a 4.91 ERA and a 1.77 WHIP with a questionable 24:20 K:BB through 22 innings.
The line says the books see this as a close game. If that is the case, it will be a close game with a lot of runs as both of these guys have holes in their games.
And, the cherry on top. The books have juiced the OVER heavily. They expect scoring. Just a bit sus that the total is only 8.5 but that's ok.
Chicago Cubs/Miami Marlins OVER 8.5 -125 for 3 units.
Have I mentioned that the METS are a bad team? I'm being facetious, of course.
I've mentioned many time that I have no idea how they are above .500.
And indeed, after a decent start, they have been fading back toward .500 steadily.
Today will be another step on that road downward.
Strider vs McGill today on the pitching matchup.
Mr. Strider has a sparkling 1.42ERA and 0.63 WHIP over his last 3 games while Mr. McGill is 5.79 and 1.71.
Mr. McGill tends to give up home runs with 4 issued in his last 3 games and 5 overall for the year.
Simply put, Strider is elite while McGill is below average so we have a very positive EV in this game.
However, the Braves ML is now -178. A bit high for my liking but I do like the RL and believe they cover this handily.
Atlanta Braves RL -1.5 -110 for 3 units
As usual, I am liking this card today way too much. Going to take a break and breathe a bit. Lol.
Have I mentioned that the METS are a bad team? I'm being facetious, of course.
I've mentioned many time that I have no idea how they are above .500.
And indeed, after a decent start, they have been fading back toward .500 steadily.
Today will be another step on that road downward.
Strider vs McGill today on the pitching matchup.
Mr. Strider has a sparkling 1.42ERA and 0.63 WHIP over his last 3 games while Mr. McGill is 5.79 and 1.71.
Mr. McGill tends to give up home runs with 4 issued in his last 3 games and 5 overall for the year.
Simply put, Strider is elite while McGill is below average so we have a very positive EV in this game.
However, the Braves ML is now -178. A bit high for my liking but I do like the RL and believe they cover this handily.
Atlanta Braves RL -1.5 -110 for 3 units
As usual, I am liking this card today way too much. Going to take a break and breathe a bit. Lol.
@KingScorpio
Hmm.
Pregame has it a bit differently. They show an open of OVER 8 -120.
Always wonder how different spots have different opening numbers. Can be a problem.
I still like the play though.
@KingScorpio
Hmm.
Pregame has it a bit differently. They show an open of OVER 8 -120.
Always wonder how different spots have different opening numbers. Can be a problem.
I still like the play though.
thanks man
thanks man
Of course, right when I say I need to tap the brakes, I start looking at Cincy/Oakland. DOH!
H. Greene vs K. Muller.
Mr. Greene has been pitching VERY well. In his last outing, he lowered his ERA to 3.52 with a 1.39 WHIP and has an impressive 30:8 K:BB through his first 23 innings this season.
Mr. Muller has not been as good, to be kind. A 11.08ERA and 2.77 WHIP in his last 3 outings.
I do not see Oakland faring well today. Hard to his that 100mph+ heater after seeing after an off speed pitch.
Good value here in the RL as well.
Cincinnati Reds ML -155 for 3 units.
Cincinnati Red RL -1.5 +110 for 3 units.
Jeez. I have got to slow down.
Of course, right when I say I need to tap the brakes, I start looking at Cincy/Oakland. DOH!
H. Greene vs K. Muller.
Mr. Greene has been pitching VERY well. In his last outing, he lowered his ERA to 3.52 with a 1.39 WHIP and has an impressive 30:8 K:BB through his first 23 innings this season.
Mr. Muller has not been as good, to be kind. A 11.08ERA and 2.77 WHIP in his last 3 outings.
I do not see Oakland faring well today. Hard to his that 100mph+ heater after seeing after an off speed pitch.
Good value here in the RL as well.
Cincinnati Reds ML -155 for 3 units.
Cincinnati Red RL -1.5 +110 for 3 units.
Jeez. I have got to slow down.
My biggest weakness as a sports gambler is taking too much action.
Especially when I am running good.
At least, I have learned to not jack units up like crazy on these days when I just love the card too much.
Helps control the variance that inevitably will occur.
I preach to you guys to play fewer games and then I do stuff like today.
I really should be ashamed.
It's the old "Do as I say, not as I do."
I hate it when I do that. But here we are. And there are likely to be a lot more coming.
My biggest weakness as a sports gambler is taking too much action.
Especially when I am running good.
At least, I have learned to not jack units up like crazy on these days when I just love the card too much.
Helps control the variance that inevitably will occur.
I preach to you guys to play fewer games and then I do stuff like today.
I really should be ashamed.
It's the old "Do as I say, not as I do."
I hate it when I do that. But here we are. And there are likely to be a lot more coming.
@AdVictoriam
Thanks for your sober, fact based baseball analysis; also, you are to be commended for your stellar BR management counsel. Pleasantries and accolades aside, regarding the Braves game, does the small-sample-size success that many of the Mets hitters have against Strider concern you with the RL play? My analysis of that match is almost identical to yours, but there are a couple Mets hitters that have had success against Strider, again small sample sizes. Thanks again for your input and solid capping.
@AdVictoriam
Thanks for your sober, fact based baseball analysis; also, you are to be commended for your stellar BR management counsel. Pleasantries and accolades aside, regarding the Braves game, does the small-sample-size success that many of the Mets hitters have against Strider concern you with the RL play? My analysis of that match is almost identical to yours, but there are a couple Mets hitters that have had success against Strider, again small sample sizes. Thanks again for your input and solid capping.
Another one I might not be able to resist. Could be because I am still a believer in Zach Plesac.
Cleveland at Boston. Z. Plesac vs B. Bello.
Could also be because Mr. Bello is just Mr. Bad at pitching. Last 3 he sports a 9.32ERA with a 2.18 WHIP. That is bad.
Mr. Plesac in his last 3 has a respectable 3.71ERA and 1.47 WHIP.
So why is the line Boston -136? This is a very good question that I can't put my finger on.
We have a little time before the game starts so I'm going to dig deeper. But Boston should not be favored in this game is my strong impression.
Just a lean for now because I have a ton of action out there now.
Another one I might not be able to resist. Could be because I am still a believer in Zach Plesac.
Cleveland at Boston. Z. Plesac vs B. Bello.
Could also be because Mr. Bello is just Mr. Bad at pitching. Last 3 he sports a 9.32ERA with a 2.18 WHIP. That is bad.
Mr. Plesac in his last 3 has a respectable 3.71ERA and 1.47 WHIP.
So why is the line Boston -136? This is a very good question that I can't put my finger on.
We have a little time before the game starts so I'm going to dig deeper. But Boston should not be favored in this game is my strong impression.
Just a lean for now because I have a ton of action out there now.
@b_all_in7
It does not concern me much, if any.
Strider has dominated in so many ways this season.
If I was to check his splits vs batters with few or no ABs vs him, I would be very surprised to see that category having huge success vs him.
This game, in no small part, is a fade of the METS who somehow continue to be overvalued by both the books and the public in my view.
But Strider is elite. Have no doubt about that. And a team heading down has a high probability of failing vs him.
@b_all_in7
It does not concern me much, if any.
Strider has dominated in so many ways this season.
If I was to check his splits vs batters with few or no ABs vs him, I would be very surprised to see that category having huge success vs him.
This game, in no small part, is a fade of the METS who somehow continue to be overvalued by both the books and the public in my view.
But Strider is elite. Have no doubt about that. And a team heading down has a high probability of failing vs him.
I want to thank AdVic as I’ve been able to both fade him and take some of his winners with great success. Yesterday I was on Twins RL. As well as Toronto ML. 2 good wins that I decided to fade AdVic. But I was also on his Over on the Reds vs A’s. So it’s all good. Hope to keep fading and riding as I see fit…
I want to thank AdVic as I’ve been able to both fade him and take some of his winners with great success. Yesterday I was on Twins RL. As well as Toronto ML. 2 good wins that I decided to fade AdVic. But I was also on his Over on the Reds vs A’s. So it’s all good. Hope to keep fading and riding as I see fit…
@AdVictoriam
Agreed on all points. I think I will still just lay the chalk on 1st 5 & FG. Thanks again for your grounded baseball insight and disciplined BR management.
@AdVictoriam
Agreed on all points. I think I will still just lay the chalk on 1st 5 & FG. Thanks again for your grounded baseball insight and disciplined BR management.
@finsterbaby
Just for you, my dear. A summary of what I have so far for today.
T.B. Devil Rays ML -143 3 units
T.B. Devil Rays RL -1.5 +115 3 units
Colorado Rockies ML -104 3 units
S.F. Giants ML +152 3 units
T.B. Devil Rays ML -142 2 units
T.B. Devil Rays RL -1.5 +115 2 units
S.F./S.D. UNDER 15 -110 3 units
Detroit Game 1 ML -107 3 units
Cubs/Miami OVER 8.5 -125 3 units
Atlanta Braves RL -1.5 -110 3 units
Cincinnati Reds ML -155 3 units
Cincinnati Reds RL -1.5 +110 3 units
@finsterbaby
Just for you, my dear. A summary of what I have so far for today.
T.B. Devil Rays ML -143 3 units
T.B. Devil Rays RL -1.5 +115 3 units
Colorado Rockies ML -104 3 units
S.F. Giants ML +152 3 units
T.B. Devil Rays ML -142 2 units
T.B. Devil Rays RL -1.5 +115 2 units
S.F./S.D. UNDER 15 -110 3 units
Detroit Game 1 ML -107 3 units
Cubs/Miami OVER 8.5 -125 3 units
Atlanta Braves RL -1.5 -110 3 units
Cincinnati Reds ML -155 3 units
Cincinnati Reds RL -1.5 +110 3 units
@ElonTrout2
Well done on those two fades.
However, I will point out that both of those games could have very easily been winners. Literally one pitch determined the outcome of the cover or not cover in both games.
Please take care in continuing to fade me and be very selective.
It could be a very -EV over the long term.
@ElonTrout2
Well done on those two fades.
However, I will point out that both of those games could have very easily been winners. Literally one pitch determined the outcome of the cover or not cover in both games.
Please take care in continuing to fade me and be very selective.
It could be a very -EV over the long term.
@AdVictoriam
Good point AdVic. Both were close. But I had a strong feeling I had the narrow advantage. And in fact the Twins were up 8-3 at one point. So it probably shouldn’t have been that close. It was the Royals who were chasing all game.
@AdVictoriam
Good point AdVic. Both were close. But I had a strong feeling I had the narrow advantage. And in fact the Twins were up 8-3 at one point. So it probably shouldn’t have been that close. It was the Royals who were chasing all game.
what a gentleman
what a gentleman
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.