Just because you can't beat somebody, it doesn't make them a cheat. I've been close more than once, even took home swag when there were weekly prizes, and I respect the fact that I didn't do well enough. Excuses and accusations are a sign of weakness. Same thing happens on stock market boards when people lose money. Besides, if you think that something like these contests are fixed, I'd bet that you are wrong. Here's a free tip - Yankees to miss the playoffs, Cleveland to get in.
Attn all mods/covers mgmnt.....how is this possible?
Just because you can't beat somebody, it doesn't make them a cheat. I've been close more than once, even took home swag when there were weekly prizes, and I respect the fact that I didn't do well enough. Excuses and accusations are a sign of weakness. Same thing happens on stock market boards when people lose money. Besides, if you think that something like these contests are fixed, I'd bet that you are wrong. Here's a free tip - Yankees to miss the playoffs, Cleveland to get in.
I have no skin in this conversation but if I may point out maybe a reason, just a thought as I've seen this issue on other sites. Each page we visit on the internet creates a cache in our browser history and sometimes, just sometimes, the browser chooses the older cache to go to. With that being said. When you look at their profile and see the last date they entered (you mentioned August 1st), could it be possible your browser is using a cached version of that one page to continue showing August 1st?? Please note, I have no skin in this conversation and on no sides and not defending anyone. I'm just a person who always thinks outside the box. ![]()
I have no skin in this conversation but if I may point out maybe a reason, just a thought as I've seen this issue on other sites. Each page we visit on the internet creates a cache in our browser history and sometimes, just sometimes, the browser chooses the older cache to go to. With that being said. When you look at their profile and see the last date they entered (you mentioned August 1st), could it be possible your browser is using a cached version of that one page to continue showing August 1st?? Please note, I have no skin in this conversation and on no sides and not defending anyone. I'm just a person who always thinks outside the box. ![]()
I got a question. What difference does it make if or when a person is online or not? What does that have to do with the prices of oranges in China?
I got a question. What difference does it make if or when a person is online or not? What does that have to do with the prices of oranges in China?
@zillagod
If I cared enough, I could sniff what goes out on the physical line when we make a pick to see if it contains our username. If that were the case and someone could hack the Internet handshaking protocol, one might be able to make picks from a program. I am pretty sure that is not happening.
@zillagod
If I cared enough, I could sniff what goes out on the physical line when we make a pick to see if it contains our username. If that were the case and someone could hack the Internet handshaking protocol, one might be able to make picks from a program. I am pretty sure that is not happening.
@DeaconBlues2525
Well, I was thinking that last activity might refer to last post and not when a pick was made. But then again, I really dont care, just curious. I mean, free contest. I am sure Covers is out to get everyone with free contests, LMAO.
@DeaconBlues2525
Well, I was thinking that last activity might refer to last post and not when a pick was made. But then again, I really dont care, just curious. I mean, free contest. I am sure Covers is out to get everyone with free contests, LMAO.
And yes Mollydog is usually in top of every contest. Notice I joined covers in 2006. I have seen MANY strange things in my time but will stay quiet for now as most nobody cares. GLTA ~![]()
And yes Mollydog is usually in top of every contest. Notice I joined covers in 2006. I have seen MANY strange things in my time but will stay quiet for now as most nobody cares. GLTA ~![]()
@Pullmyfinger14
the mollydog discusssion has been complained about before .The one I remember had to do w/lines nobody seemed to be able get except molly. It was awhile back . ![]()
@Pullmyfinger14
the mollydog discusssion has been complained about before .The one I remember had to do w/lines nobody seemed to be able get except molly. It was awhile back . ![]()
@cheeser
it actually makes perfect sense if you follow line moves. get a good line service and take advantage of the lag between real time odds and the contest odds. when the don best screen first came out you could do this for real money but not so much anymore. in fact all of the onshore books will boot you almost instantly if they suspect you of being a steam player. i find what he is doing commendable.
@cheeser
it actually makes perfect sense if you follow line moves. get a good line service and take advantage of the lag between real time odds and the contest odds. when the don best screen first came out you could do this for real money but not so much anymore. in fact all of the onshore books will boot you almost instantly if they suspect you of being a steam player. i find what he is doing commendable.
@tossthecoin
Thanks. I give it my best shot without spending too much time on it.
This whole molly issue seems to be causing a lot of grief. I see accusations of molly cheating and of Covers being in on it. I even see people saying they may leave the site because of it. Being the type of person who loves everyone, I want to bring this to an end. Therefore, I will explain exactly what is happening.
The following questions were brought up by the original poster.
1. How is it possible to make picks while offline/not logged in?
I believe you cannot without some excellent hacking skills and as I will outline later in this post, it would be unnecessary. Also, to be able to do this, Covers would need to be sending your username across the wire on each pick. If it is stored in a context variable (which it probably is), it would become very difficult.
2. How is it possible to make picks past the time deadline?
It is not. Picks just don't show up to others immediately. Try it yourself. Immediately after picking, go to the leaderboard. You probably won't see your picks immediately.
3. Can you/somebody check to see anyone's history when they were logged in and not logged in?
No need for the reasons I just pointed out.
I will address your next concern.
Contestant "mollydog" who has been known to get the best lines possible 98% of the time.
There is an explanation of this. There is a bug that I reported in the Help Forum on June 25. It allows one to get any line that has been current in the past during the 15-minute window that the previous line is good for. That is how molly does it, but don't single out molly. He is not alone in leveraging this bug. If you see someone near the top regularly, you can watch to see when they make their pick and if it is not the current line (or was current 15 minutes ago), they are leveraging the bug, especially if they get Monday's line on Thursday. I will not name anyone. Some might not even know they are doing it. I used to check as soon as I got up for line movements and assumed if I got the old line, it was less than 15 minutes old. Now I am sure some of those lines were stale and I now refresh the page first thing in the morning. I encourage everyone to monitor me. I am careful not to make a stale pick.
Is this cheating? I don't know, is a coach who notices the refs are not calling holding and tells their players to hold cheating? Most would say no. Occasionally I notice that Covers is not updating their lines and I grab some good lines that are current. Maybe that is cheating. I would say don't judge them, but I do hope Covers fixes the bug.
People are saying Covers is in on it. Occam’s Razor says the simplest answer is often the correct one. My guess is a programmer chose between keeping a table of the most recent line so it could be checked and just accepting anything for 15 minutes and chose the easier path. As for my report of the bug, it got no replies. So, it may have been pushed down by other posts and Covers never saw it or they may have felt that there was little interest from the contestants due to no replies. I kind of don't care because I enjoy the challenge of trying to beat someone who is getting much better lines than me, but I really do think it would be awesome to know who can continue to be near the top after the bug were fixed.
In summary, I would not call molly or the others cheaters anymore than that football coach and there is no reason to assume Covers is fixing any contest.
I apologize for any typos. The chemo has left me unable to feel my fingers, but they DID get rid of the Cancer.
On a lighter note, here are my standings in the ESPN College pickem. I am in the top 1.4%, but I like the Covers contest better. Root for me there. I would love to see a Covers contestant win one of those major contests.
@tossthecoin
Thanks. I give it my best shot without spending too much time on it.
This whole molly issue seems to be causing a lot of grief. I see accusations of molly cheating and of Covers being in on it. I even see people saying they may leave the site because of it. Being the type of person who loves everyone, I want to bring this to an end. Therefore, I will explain exactly what is happening.
The following questions were brought up by the original poster.
1. How is it possible to make picks while offline/not logged in?
I believe you cannot without some excellent hacking skills and as I will outline later in this post, it would be unnecessary. Also, to be able to do this, Covers would need to be sending your username across the wire on each pick. If it is stored in a context variable (which it probably is), it would become very difficult.
2. How is it possible to make picks past the time deadline?
It is not. Picks just don't show up to others immediately. Try it yourself. Immediately after picking, go to the leaderboard. You probably won't see your picks immediately.
3. Can you/somebody check to see anyone's history when they were logged in and not logged in?
No need for the reasons I just pointed out.
I will address your next concern.
Contestant "mollydog" who has been known to get the best lines possible 98% of the time.
There is an explanation of this. There is a bug that I reported in the Help Forum on June 25. It allows one to get any line that has been current in the past during the 15-minute window that the previous line is good for. That is how molly does it, but don't single out molly. He is not alone in leveraging this bug. If you see someone near the top regularly, you can watch to see when they make their pick and if it is not the current line (or was current 15 minutes ago), they are leveraging the bug, especially if they get Monday's line on Thursday. I will not name anyone. Some might not even know they are doing it. I used to check as soon as I got up for line movements and assumed if I got the old line, it was less than 15 minutes old. Now I am sure some of those lines were stale and I now refresh the page first thing in the morning. I encourage everyone to monitor me. I am careful not to make a stale pick.
Is this cheating? I don't know, is a coach who notices the refs are not calling holding and tells their players to hold cheating? Most would say no. Occasionally I notice that Covers is not updating their lines and I grab some good lines that are current. Maybe that is cheating. I would say don't judge them, but I do hope Covers fixes the bug.
People are saying Covers is in on it. Occam’s Razor says the simplest answer is often the correct one. My guess is a programmer chose between keeping a table of the most recent line so it could be checked and just accepting anything for 15 minutes and chose the easier path. As for my report of the bug, it got no replies. So, it may have been pushed down by other posts and Covers never saw it or they may have felt that there was little interest from the contestants due to no replies. I kind of don't care because I enjoy the challenge of trying to beat someone who is getting much better lines than me, but I really do think it would be awesome to know who can continue to be near the top after the bug were fixed.
In summary, I would not call molly or the others cheaters anymore than that football coach and there is no reason to assume Covers is fixing any contest.
I apologize for any typos. The chemo has left me unable to feel my fingers, but they DID get rid of the Cancer.
On a lighter note, here are my standings in the ESPN College pickem. I am in the top 1.4%, but I like the Covers contest better. Root for me there. I would love to see a Covers contestant win one of those major contests.
I got a question. What difference does it make if or when a person is online or not? What does that have to do with the prices of oranges in China?
FRAUD
I got a question. What difference does it make if or when a person is online or not? What does that have to do with the prices of oranges in China?
FRAUD
[Quote: Originally Posted by DeaconBlues2525]@tossthecoin Thanks. I give it my best shot without spending too much time on it. This whole molly issue seems to be causing a lot of grief. I see accusations of molly cheating and of Covers being in on it. I even see people saying they may leave the site because of it. Being the type of person who loves everyone, I want to bring this to an end. Therefore, I will explain exactly what is happening. The following questions were brought up by the original poster. 1. How is it possible to make picks while offline/not logged in? I believe you cannot without some excellent hacking skills and as I will outline later in this post, it would be unnecessary. Also, to be able to do this, Covers would need to be sending your username across the wire on each pick. If it is stored in a context variable (which it probably is), it would become very difficult. 2. How is it possible to make picks past the time deadline? It is not. Picks just don't show up to others immediately. Try it yourself. Immediately after picking, go to the leaderboard. You probably won't see your picks immediately. 3. Can you/somebody check to see anyone's history when they were logged in and not logged in? No need for the reasons I just pointed out. I will address your next concern. Contestant "mollydog" who has been known to get the best lines possible 98% of the time. There is an explanation of this. There is a bug that I reported in the Help Forum on June 25. It allows one to get any line that has been current in the past during the 15-minute window that the previous line is good for. That is how molly does it, but don't single out molly. He is not alone in leveraging this bug. If you see someone near the top regularly, you can watch to see when they make their pick and if it is not the current line (or was current 15 minutes ago), they are leveraging the bug, especially if they get Monday's line on Thursday. I will not name anyone. Some might not even know they are doing it. I used to check as soon as I got up for line movements and assumed if I got the old line, it was less than 15 minutes old. Now I am sure some of those lines were stale and I now refresh the page first thing in the morning. I encourage everyone to monitor me. I am careful not to make a stale pick. Is this cheating? I don't know, is a coach who notices the refs are not calling holding and tells their players to hold cheating? Most would say no. Occasionally I notice that Covers is not updating their lines and I grab some good lines that are current. Maybe that is cheating. I would say don't judge them, but I do hope Covers fixes the bug. People are saying Covers is in on it. Occam’s Razor says the simplest answer is often the correct one. My guess is a programmer chose between keeping a table of the most recent line so it could be checked and just accepting anything for 15 minutes and chose the easier path. As for my report of the bug, it got no replies. So, it may have been pushed down by other posts and Covers never saw it or they may have felt that there was little interest from the contestants due to no replies. I kind of don't care because I enjoy the challenge of trying to beat someone who is getting much better lines than me, but I really do think it would be awesome to know who can continue to be near the top after the bug were fixed. In summary, I would not call molly or the others cheaters anymore than that football coach and there is no reason to assume Covers is fixing any contest. Quote]
well said may they keep you of the penalty box…
MD I don’t buy what you’re selling at all. Just curious how many contests have you won through the years, and maybe the cash amounts? I’m certain it’s staggering…. ![]()
[Quote: Originally Posted by DeaconBlues2525]@tossthecoin Thanks. I give it my best shot without spending too much time on it. This whole molly issue seems to be causing a lot of grief. I see accusations of molly cheating and of Covers being in on it. I even see people saying they may leave the site because of it. Being the type of person who loves everyone, I want to bring this to an end. Therefore, I will explain exactly what is happening. The following questions were brought up by the original poster. 1. How is it possible to make picks while offline/not logged in? I believe you cannot without some excellent hacking skills and as I will outline later in this post, it would be unnecessary. Also, to be able to do this, Covers would need to be sending your username across the wire on each pick. If it is stored in a context variable (which it probably is), it would become very difficult. 2. How is it possible to make picks past the time deadline? It is not. Picks just don't show up to others immediately. Try it yourself. Immediately after picking, go to the leaderboard. You probably won't see your picks immediately. 3. Can you/somebody check to see anyone's history when they were logged in and not logged in? No need for the reasons I just pointed out. I will address your next concern. Contestant "mollydog" who has been known to get the best lines possible 98% of the time. There is an explanation of this. There is a bug that I reported in the Help Forum on June 25. It allows one to get any line that has been current in the past during the 15-minute window that the previous line is good for. That is how molly does it, but don't single out molly. He is not alone in leveraging this bug. If you see someone near the top regularly, you can watch to see when they make their pick and if it is not the current line (or was current 15 minutes ago), they are leveraging the bug, especially if they get Monday's line on Thursday. I will not name anyone. Some might not even know they are doing it. I used to check as soon as I got up for line movements and assumed if I got the old line, it was less than 15 minutes old. Now I am sure some of those lines were stale and I now refresh the page first thing in the morning. I encourage everyone to monitor me. I am careful not to make a stale pick. Is this cheating? I don't know, is a coach who notices the refs are not calling holding and tells their players to hold cheating? Most would say no. Occasionally I notice that Covers is not updating their lines and I grab some good lines that are current. Maybe that is cheating. I would say don't judge them, but I do hope Covers fixes the bug. People are saying Covers is in on it. Occam’s Razor says the simplest answer is often the correct one. My guess is a programmer chose between keeping a table of the most recent line so it could be checked and just accepting anything for 15 minutes and chose the easier path. As for my report of the bug, it got no replies. So, it may have been pushed down by other posts and Covers never saw it or they may have felt that there was little interest from the contestants due to no replies. I kind of don't care because I enjoy the challenge of trying to beat someone who is getting much better lines than me, but I really do think it would be awesome to know who can continue to be near the top after the bug were fixed. In summary, I would not call molly or the others cheaters anymore than that football coach and there is no reason to assume Covers is fixing any contest. Quote]
well said may they keep you of the penalty box…
MD I don’t buy what you’re selling at all. Just curious how many contests have you won through the years, and maybe the cash amounts? I’m certain it’s staggering…. ![]()
DeaconBlues,
Well written. I get a kick of the “Mollydog works for Covers” conspiracy.
I’ve always respected your record and selections, now I have a greater respect for the person. Your cancer free mention in your post literally just made my day. I lost both my parents in their 50s and I pray it never rears its ugly head for you again.
JJ, no matter what I do, I’m always going to have a few doubters. I’ve had a great run on this site and have, knock on wood, never once lost $1 at any of my rare casino/sportsbook visits. I can only hope my streak doesn’t run dry. That said, Wishing you the very best of luck. Let’s go….
Regarding the best lines 98% of the time, I grab some early when the offshore lines jump and wait on others where I am fading Joe Public. I feel the percentage where I gain line value is more like 80%, but that matters over hundreds of selections. Ultimately, you still have to pick the winning side. Look at my MLB and NFL records this year, they’re flat out awful. I always challenge myself to be more consistent and help everyone watching gain an advantage. I still have a lot of work to do here.
Noted some sites that I frequent below to monitor line movement real-time and hopefully get ahead of the casinos and books.
Offshore line movements shown real-time: freeplays.com relay line moves is real time.
Line movements and bets tracking, by book or casino: WagerTalk.com/odds
Handicapper free picks: freeplays.com and randrtotals.com are two of my faves for free picks. Some of the cappers listed NEVER give a winning play, some occasionally. Knowing each of their records and history helps me with deciding my leans and picks.
Again, I hope my crazy efforts help win some of you $$$. Good luck…
DeaconBlues, keep up the tremendous work.
Mollydog
DeaconBlues,
Well written. I get a kick of the “Mollydog works for Covers” conspiracy.
I’ve always respected your record and selections, now I have a greater respect for the person. Your cancer free mention in your post literally just made my day. I lost both my parents in their 50s and I pray it never rears its ugly head for you again.
JJ, no matter what I do, I’m always going to have a few doubters. I’ve had a great run on this site and have, knock on wood, never once lost $1 at any of my rare casino/sportsbook visits. I can only hope my streak doesn’t run dry. That said, Wishing you the very best of luck. Let’s go….
Regarding the best lines 98% of the time, I grab some early when the offshore lines jump and wait on others where I am fading Joe Public. I feel the percentage where I gain line value is more like 80%, but that matters over hundreds of selections. Ultimately, you still have to pick the winning side. Look at my MLB and NFL records this year, they’re flat out awful. I always challenge myself to be more consistent and help everyone watching gain an advantage. I still have a lot of work to do here.
Noted some sites that I frequent below to monitor line movement real-time and hopefully get ahead of the casinos and books.
Offshore line movements shown real-time: freeplays.com relay line moves is real time.
Line movements and bets tracking, by book or casino: WagerTalk.com/odds
Handicapper free picks: freeplays.com and randrtotals.com are two of my faves for free picks. Some of the cappers listed NEVER give a winning play, some occasionally. Knowing each of their records and history helps me with deciding my leans and picks.
Again, I hope my crazy efforts help win some of you $$$. Good luck…
DeaconBlues, keep up the tremendous work.
Mollydog
@DeaconBlues2525
Why Certain Contest Players Always Get “The Best Line” in College Basketball
There has been a lot of confusion on Covers about one recurring issue:
How can certain players always seem to lock in the best number in college hoops contests?
They aren’t psychic.
They aren’t super-sharp handicappers.
They aren’t fixing games.
What they *are* doing is taking advantage of how the contest lines are updated.
Let’s break it down in simple terms.
---
## 1. Contest Lines Come From Pinnacle
Covers uses Pinnacle as the line source. That part is straightforward.
But here’s the important point:
**Pinnacle updates instantly. Covers updates on a delay.**
Usually around **10–15 minutes**.
This delay is where the entire “advantage” comes from.
---
## 2. College Basketball Lines Move More Than Any Other Sport
In major sports (NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB), lines barely move:
* Half a point here
* A point there
* Nothing major
But in smaller college basketball games, early lines can move **5–10 points** in a single morning.
Why?
Because these lines are soft, the limits are low, and sharp bettors hit bad numbers immediately.
Example of what happens all the time:
Pinnacle opens Lindenwood **+3.5**.
Sharp bettors smash it.
Thirty minutes later it’s **Lindenwood -3**.
That’s a **6.5-point swing** — something that never happens in pro sports.
---
## 3. Covers Lines Don’t Move During These Sharp Moves
When Pinnacle jumps from:
**+3.5 ? -3**
Covers is still showing the old number for several minutes.
So while the real world is at **LINW -3**, Covers contestants still see **LINW +3.5**.
That number is stale.
And anybody who enters picks during that gap is getting a line that no longer exists anywhere else.
---
## 4. This Creates “Free Value”
If you can grab:
* +3.5 when the true market is -2
* +4 when the true market is -1
* +2.5 when the true market is -3
you’re basically flipping a coin where someone already tells you the outcome.
This is called **closing line value (CLV)**.
In college basketball, CLV is extremely powerful.
If you beat the close by 3+ points, you win far more often than you lose — even if your actual handicapping is mediocre.
This is why certain players:
* Look unbeatable
* Always get the best number
* Only dominate during college basketball season
* Don’t win in NBA, NHL, MLB, NFL
Because pro sports do not move enough to create stale lines.
College hoops *do*.
---
## 5. These Players Are Not Handicapping Geniuses
Let’s call it what it is:
They are not beating the market.
They are beating **Covers’ 10–15 minute update lag**.
The formula is simple:
1. Watch Pinnacle live.
2. Wait for a big steam move.
3. Jump into Covers before the update hits.
4. Lock in a number that is already outdated.
This is not illegal.
But it’s not “handicapping skill,” either.
It’s timing and exploiting a delay.
---
## 6. Why They Only Win in College Basketball
Because:
* No other sport has wild early-morning line swings
* No other sport is as soft at open
* No other sport creates 4- to 7-point stale numbers
* No other sport gives free CLV the way small-conference CBB does
It’s the perfect storm for gaming the system.
---
## 7. What This Means for Contest Players
If you wonder:
“How does this guy always get the best number?”
The answer is simple:
He’s entering picks during the line-lag window every morning while Pinnacle is moving the market and Covers hasn’t updated yet.
Nothing more.
Nothing less.
No mystery.
@DeaconBlues2525
Why Certain Contest Players Always Get “The Best Line” in College Basketball
There has been a lot of confusion on Covers about one recurring issue:
How can certain players always seem to lock in the best number in college hoops contests?
They aren’t psychic.
They aren’t super-sharp handicappers.
They aren’t fixing games.
What they *are* doing is taking advantage of how the contest lines are updated.
Let’s break it down in simple terms.
---
## 1. Contest Lines Come From Pinnacle
Covers uses Pinnacle as the line source. That part is straightforward.
But here’s the important point:
**Pinnacle updates instantly. Covers updates on a delay.**
Usually around **10–15 minutes**.
This delay is where the entire “advantage” comes from.
---
## 2. College Basketball Lines Move More Than Any Other Sport
In major sports (NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB), lines barely move:
* Half a point here
* A point there
* Nothing major
But in smaller college basketball games, early lines can move **5–10 points** in a single morning.
Why?
Because these lines are soft, the limits are low, and sharp bettors hit bad numbers immediately.
Example of what happens all the time:
Pinnacle opens Lindenwood **+3.5**.
Sharp bettors smash it.
Thirty minutes later it’s **Lindenwood -3**.
That’s a **6.5-point swing** — something that never happens in pro sports.
---
## 3. Covers Lines Don’t Move During These Sharp Moves
When Pinnacle jumps from:
**+3.5 ? -3**
Covers is still showing the old number for several minutes.
So while the real world is at **LINW -3**, Covers contestants still see **LINW +3.5**.
That number is stale.
And anybody who enters picks during that gap is getting a line that no longer exists anywhere else.
---
## 4. This Creates “Free Value”
If you can grab:
* +3.5 when the true market is -2
* +4 when the true market is -1
* +2.5 when the true market is -3
you’re basically flipping a coin where someone already tells you the outcome.
This is called **closing line value (CLV)**.
In college basketball, CLV is extremely powerful.
If you beat the close by 3+ points, you win far more often than you lose — even if your actual handicapping is mediocre.
This is why certain players:
* Look unbeatable
* Always get the best number
* Only dominate during college basketball season
* Don’t win in NBA, NHL, MLB, NFL
Because pro sports do not move enough to create stale lines.
College hoops *do*.
---
## 5. These Players Are Not Handicapping Geniuses
Let’s call it what it is:
They are not beating the market.
They are beating **Covers’ 10–15 minute update lag**.
The formula is simple:
1. Watch Pinnacle live.
2. Wait for a big steam move.
3. Jump into Covers before the update hits.
4. Lock in a number that is already outdated.
This is not illegal.
But it’s not “handicapping skill,” either.
It’s timing and exploiting a delay.
---
## 6. Why They Only Win in College Basketball
Because:
* No other sport has wild early-morning line swings
* No other sport is as soft at open
* No other sport creates 4- to 7-point stale numbers
* No other sport gives free CLV the way small-conference CBB does
It’s the perfect storm for gaming the system.
---
## 7. What This Means for Contest Players
If you wonder:
“How does this guy always get the best number?”
The answer is simple:
He’s entering picks during the line-lag window every morning while Pinnacle is moving the market and Covers hasn’t updated yet.
Nothing more.
Nothing less.
No mystery.
@Vladieee
this is exactly right i only have 1 thing to add.
if you do not have an active, funded pinnacle account you will be looking at lagged numbers also. i think its a 10 minute delay if you dont have an account and are just browsing their site.
@Vladieee
this is exactly right i only have 1 thing to add.
if you do not have an active, funded pinnacle account you will be looking at lagged numbers also. i think its a 10 minute delay if you dont have an account and are just browsing their site.
@viper5887
I originally assumed that Covers used Pinnacle exclusively as their line source, but that was incorrect. Their odds actually come from a rotating group of 11 different sportsbooks, and Covers pulls whichever book is offering the best available number at any given time. Those books are Tooniebet, Sports Interaction, TonyBet, bet365, Pinnacle, Betano, BET99, Caesars, BetMGM, BetRivers, and Betway.
@viper5887
I originally assumed that Covers used Pinnacle exclusively as their line source, but that was incorrect. Their odds actually come from a rotating group of 11 different sportsbooks, and Covers pulls whichever book is offering the best available number at any given time. Those books are Tooniebet, Sports Interaction, TonyBet, bet365, Pinnacle, Betano, BET99, Caesars, BetMGM, BetRivers, and Betway.
@Vladieee
yep. i know its not pinnacle lines. but you are correct on playing the lag between real odds and contest odds. i used to use pinnacle as my source and take advantage of slower moving books for real money. its not the same today as it was back in the late 90s early 2000s. most books will move on air within seconds of a pinnacle or cris move to not get hammered by sharps.
@Vladieee
yep. i know its not pinnacle lines. but you are correct on playing the lag between real odds and contest odds. i used to use pinnacle as my source and take advantage of slower moving books for real money. its not the same today as it was back in the late 90s early 2000s. most books will move on air within seconds of a pinnacle or cris move to not get hammered by sharps.
Dear Covers Team
I want to raise a fairness concern regarding the Georgia State vs. Arizona State total posted by the user mollydog, specifically the Under 149.5 selection. That number was not available anywhere in the market at the time indicated by his pick timestamp. Based on archived line movement, 149.5 had been gone for many hours. Given the documented movement across every book, it would have been impossible for any bettor—including mollydog—to legitimately obtain 149.5 at the time his pick was recorded, yet the system still accepted it.
Below is the essential market history across books, showing the actual totals available:
Tooniebet – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.5 -108 / u145.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 08:14 ET: o145.5 -114 / u145.5 -112
Mon Nov 17 07:59 ET: o146.5 -112 / u146.5 -114
Mon Nov 17 01:14 ET: o147.5 -113 / u147.5 -113
Sun Nov 16 22:29 ET: o148.5 -114 / u148.5 -112
Sports Interaction – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:39 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:34 ET: o144.5 -105 / u144.5 -115
Mon Nov 17 08:29 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o144.5 -115 / u144.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:04 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -110
TonyBet – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:41 ET: o144.5 -114 / u144.5 -122
Mon Nov 17 08:31 ET: o144.5 -118 / u144.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 08:11 ET: o145.5 -115 / u145.5 -120
Mon Nov 17 07:56 ET: o146.5 -114 / u146.5 -122
Sun Nov 16 17:26 ET: o149.5 -122 / u149.5 -112
bet365 – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:24 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.0 -110 / u145.0 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:09 ET: o146.0 -110 / u146.0 -110
Sun Nov 16 17:19 ET: o149.5 -110 / u149.5 -110
Pinnacle – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:21 ET: o143.5 -111 / u143.5 -109
Mon Nov 17 08:11 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -110
Betano – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:25 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -111
Mon Nov 17 08:05 ET: o147.5 -110 / u147.5 -111
Sun Nov 16 22:55 ET: o149.5 -110 / u149.5 -111
BET99 – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:33 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:27 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Sun Nov 16 18:42 ET: o149.5 -105 / u149.5 -115
Caesars – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o144.0 -110 / u144.0 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.0 -110 / u145.0 -110
Sun Nov 16 19:04 ET: o148.5 -110 / u148.5 -110
BetMGM – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.5 -105 / u145.5 -115
Sun Nov 16 19:49 ET: o148.5 -110 / u148.5 -110
BetRivers – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:14 ET: o145.5 -108 / u145.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 07:59 ET: o146.5 -112 / u146.5 -114
Betway – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:32 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -115
Mon Nov 17 08:12 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -115
Across all books, 149.5 disappeared late afternoon to early evening on Sun Nov 16. By the time his pick timestamp appears on Covers, every sportsbook was between 143.5 and 146.5. Not a single operator was offering 149.5, and none came close to returning to it. This makes the recorded pick number objectively unobtainable in any real market.
This is not a personal complaint. It is a structural concern: if outdated numbers are selectable, intentionally or not, it creates an unfair environment for everyone else operating on actual, available lines.
I am asking Covers to verify whether line selections are being validated correctly and whether users can still choose numbers after they have moved. Any clarification on how timestamps align with the actual market would help the entire community.
The goal is simple: fairness.
Dear Covers Team
I want to raise a fairness concern regarding the Georgia State vs. Arizona State total posted by the user mollydog, specifically the Under 149.5 selection. That number was not available anywhere in the market at the time indicated by his pick timestamp. Based on archived line movement, 149.5 had been gone for many hours. Given the documented movement across every book, it would have been impossible for any bettor—including mollydog—to legitimately obtain 149.5 at the time his pick was recorded, yet the system still accepted it.
Below is the essential market history across books, showing the actual totals available:
Tooniebet – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.5 -108 / u145.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 08:14 ET: o145.5 -114 / u145.5 -112
Mon Nov 17 07:59 ET: o146.5 -112 / u146.5 -114
Mon Nov 17 01:14 ET: o147.5 -113 / u147.5 -113
Sun Nov 16 22:29 ET: o148.5 -114 / u148.5 -112
Sports Interaction – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:39 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:34 ET: o144.5 -105 / u144.5 -115
Mon Nov 17 08:29 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o144.5 -115 / u144.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:04 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -110
TonyBet – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:41 ET: o144.5 -114 / u144.5 -122
Mon Nov 17 08:31 ET: o144.5 -118 / u144.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 08:11 ET: o145.5 -115 / u145.5 -120
Mon Nov 17 07:56 ET: o146.5 -114 / u146.5 -122
Sun Nov 16 17:26 ET: o149.5 -122 / u149.5 -112
bet365 – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:24 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.0 -110 / u145.0 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:09 ET: o146.0 -110 / u146.0 -110
Sun Nov 16 17:19 ET: o149.5 -110 / u149.5 -110
Pinnacle – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:21 ET: o143.5 -111 / u143.5 -109
Mon Nov 17 08:11 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -110
Betano – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:25 ET: o143.5 -110 / u143.5 -111
Mon Nov 17 08:05 ET: o147.5 -110 / u147.5 -111
Sun Nov 16 22:55 ET: o149.5 -110 / u149.5 -111
BET99 – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:33 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:27 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Sun Nov 16 18:42 ET: o149.5 -105 / u149.5 -115
Caesars – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o144.0 -110 / u144.0 -110
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.0 -110 / u145.0 -110
Sun Nov 16 19:04 ET: o148.5 -110 / u148.5 -110
BetMGM – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:49 ET: o143.5 -115 / u143.5 -105
Mon Nov 17 08:19 ET: o145.5 -105 / u145.5 -115
Sun Nov 16 19:49 ET: o148.5 -110 / u148.5 -110
BetRivers – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:14 ET: o145.5 -108 / u145.5 -118
Mon Nov 17 07:59 ET: o146.5 -112 / u146.5 -114
Betway – O/U
Mon Nov 17 08:32 ET: o144.5 -110 / u144.5 -115
Mon Nov 17 08:12 ET: o145.5 -110 / u145.5 -115
Across all books, 149.5 disappeared late afternoon to early evening on Sun Nov 16. By the time his pick timestamp appears on Covers, every sportsbook was between 143.5 and 146.5. Not a single operator was offering 149.5, and none came close to returning to it. This makes the recorded pick number objectively unobtainable in any real market.
This is not a personal complaint. It is a structural concern: if outdated numbers are selectable, intentionally or not, it creates an unfair environment for everyone else operating on actual, available lines.
I am asking Covers to verify whether line selections are being validated correctly and whether users can still choose numbers after they have moved. Any clarification on how timestamps align with the actual market would help the entire community.
The goal is simple: fairness.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 461,199
- PART DEUX 364
- Wednesday 10/14/2026 962
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 275,006
- 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 191,823
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 42,601
- I'm Back, and I'm betting the same wager AGAIN... 4,374
- Dodgers will tank the NLCS series 1,627
- BREW/LAD live in game comments welcome 475
- the whole problem is knowingly spreading false info to vulnerable people 21,297
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
