XLM, XRP, TRX
buck,
Ive seen that discussion about bank adoption and it makes sense due to the cost no question but the issues are these..
First, everything I've seen from XRP and the guys behind it telegraph that they are in this to make a solid, stable platform for banks to transact..and that they are not wanting an unstable environment and that is why they are controlling the float and have a ton in "treasury" coin to keep the float under control. I do not think that they will allow this to skyrocket as that would be bad for their business model...banks are not going to want the headache of massive price differences as that could easily lead to losses if they choose to go this route. I think the guys behind this are against the speculative nature of other coin out there and I read some pieces implying that.
Second, banks do not have to "own" these to transact with them, they can buy and sell when they need as they need to perform a transaction and then be net flat at the end of the transaction...so I dont see a "load up" scenario here, in fact banks are not wanting to sink money into owning a coin, rather they want to quickly and cheaply transact and be done. So I dont think there will be this massive rush into owning XRP by banks. Let me know if you disagree.
My analysis is that the guys behind this want XRP right at a buck...that makes sense and is semi similar to a money market with lower costs and faster transaction speed.
buck,
Ive seen that discussion about bank adoption and it makes sense due to the cost no question but the issues are these..
First, everything I've seen from XRP and the guys behind it telegraph that they are in this to make a solid, stable platform for banks to transact..and that they are not wanting an unstable environment and that is why they are controlling the float and have a ton in "treasury" coin to keep the float under control. I do not think that they will allow this to skyrocket as that would be bad for their business model...banks are not going to want the headache of massive price differences as that could easily lead to losses if they choose to go this route. I think the guys behind this are against the speculative nature of other coin out there and I read some pieces implying that.
Second, banks do not have to "own" these to transact with them, they can buy and sell when they need as they need to perform a transaction and then be net flat at the end of the transaction...so I dont see a "load up" scenario here, in fact banks are not wanting to sink money into owning a coin, rather they want to quickly and cheaply transact and be done. So I dont think there will be this massive rush into owning XRP by banks. Let me know if you disagree.
My analysis is that the guys behind this want XRP right at a buck...that makes sense and is semi similar to a money market with lower costs and faster transaction speed.
Read up on Substratum fade..they plan to launch alpha here shortly.Im in this around .30 shes sitting at .78 as I type this
Read up on Substratum fade..they plan to launch alpha here shortly.Im in this around .30 shes sitting at .78 as I type this
Hot Forum Topics
- BEAT Your book 127,512
- Tuesday 11/10/2026 348
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 63,590
- NFL LOCKED IN! 113,701
- Florida Man Tuesday 3,909
- Week 11 Money 2,735
- Trump's legacy? 37,167
- $$ALL IN ( 2x5uNIT=1-O,5UnitUNDER=4-2,5Unit over=1-O,5Unit ATS=2-O,2Unit=4-o_ =+ 43 Units 4,590
- Bags Tuesday LARGE **Michigan State vs Duke** 2,100
- ::Tuesday:: 11/10 (34-15-0) +18.6 units 2,595
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
