Peter lynch
No, never read any of Peter Lynch's stuff.. I'd be more an advocate of John Bogle.
If you are asking how to invest wisely (not sure if "correct" would be an appropriate description) , invest in Index Funds. As funny as it sounds, you'll have a tough time beating the averages over long periods of time.
No, never read any of Peter Lynch's stuff.. I'd be more an advocate of John Bogle.
If you are asking how to invest wisely (not sure if "correct" would be an appropriate description) , invest in Index Funds. As funny as it sounds, you'll have a tough time beating the averages over long periods of time.
No, never read any of Peter Lynch's stuff.. I'd be more an advocate of John Bogle.
If you are asking how to invest wisely (not sure if "correct" would be an appropriate description) , invest in Index Funds. As funny as it sounds, you'll have a tough time beating the averages over long periods of time.
Hard to go wrong with either---but harder to be advocate of Lynch without having read or studied him. He is worth studying if you ever have time.
No, never read any of Peter Lynch's stuff.. I'd be more an advocate of John Bogle.
If you are asking how to invest wisely (not sure if "correct" would be an appropriate description) , invest in Index Funds. As funny as it sounds, you'll have a tough time beating the averages over long periods of time.
Hard to go wrong with either---but harder to be advocate of Lynch without having read or studied him. He is worth studying if you ever have time.
Yeah Peter made good points long long ago, still applicable today but for sure back in the 90's when that longer term value proposal held more merit.
Confused me. You think long term value is not important anymore? Or you just prefer the quicker startegies? Longterm is the classic style and has always worked. Not opposed to the other attempts---it just seems to me too many investors nowadays are too impatient. Quick buck, etc.
Yeah Peter made good points long long ago, still applicable today but for sure back in the 90's when that longer term value proposal held more merit.
Confused me. You think long term value is not important anymore? Or you just prefer the quicker startegies? Longterm is the classic style and has always worked. Not opposed to the other attempts---it just seems to me too many investors nowadays are too impatient. Quick buck, etc.
Confused me. You think long term value is not important anymore? Or you just prefer the quicker startegies? Longterm is the classic style and has always worked. Not opposed to the other attempts---it just seems to me too many investors nowadays are too impatient. Quick buck, etc.
Confused me. You think long term value is not important anymore? Or you just prefer the quicker startegies? Longterm is the classic style and has always worked. Not opposed to the other attempts---it just seems to me too many investors nowadays are too impatient. Quick buck, etc.
Hot Forum Topics
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 63,587
- Tuesday 11/10/2026 305
- NFL LOCKED IN! 113,699
- Florida Man Tuesday 3,229
- Week 11 Money 2,299
- BILLS/VIKS live in game comments welcome 797
- 11/9 3,974
- Bags Tuesday LARGE **Michigan State vs Duke** 1,640
- ::Tuesday:: 11/10 (34-15-0) +18.6 units 1,943
- MODERATE voters say ... 35,402
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
