CD - Sorry to pull down the long pole in your tent of reason but hypocrisy could never be better defined than (D)'s taking advantage of the suffering of their constituents in order to pass a bunch of pork that will not even begin to address the "Superstorm Sandy" victims, and then blaming (R)'s for not caring. 
CD - Sorry to pull down the long pole in your tent of reason but hypocrisy could never be better defined than (D)'s taking advantage of the suffering of their constituents in order to pass a bunch of pork that will not even begin to address the "Superstorm Sandy" victims, and then blaming (R)'s for not caring.
Don't take my word for it, New Jersey (D) congressman Robert Andrews called out his colleagues in January for their blatant pork laden Federal relief package. 
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/11/new-jersey-democrat-wants-pork-free-sandy-storm-ai/
since you can't actually articulate a position on how the Salon article demonstrates hypocrisy (because it does not) you say silly things such as this.
Keep going.
Liberals tittering about Oklahoma's senators having to ask their colleagues to pass a bill for federal assistance in recovering from the Moore tornado will be disappointed to discovering that no such bill is necessary.
https://www.startribune.com/nation/208368291.html?refer=y
Salon, think progress, clubdirt, and scalabrine hardest hit!
since you can't actually articulate a position on how the Salon article demonstrates hypocrisy (because it does not) you say silly things such as this.
Keep going.
Notice instead of articulating any actual "hypocrisy" you keep repeating "read the article"
The article contains no actual hypocrisy - which is why Benghazi, Head Start, the sequester, and meals on wheels are all invoked - but it does contain outright lies and name calling.
What is even funnier about this is that you keep repating the same thing over & over, yet can't articulate it at all.
You can't explain or defend what Salon is saying, you merely accept it as true.
It is false, and you can't demonstrate otherwise.
It isn't hypocrisy.
You have no actual response other than to call names and say "read the story"
You also have no actual response to post #40 - because you haven't gotten any talking points from think progres.
It isn't hypocrisy.
You have no actual response other than to call names and say "read the story"
You also have no actual response to post #40 - because you haven't gotten any talking points from think progres.
You've graduated from "read the article" to "Peter King"!!!
Uh, Peter King is wrong. He's operating on a silly premise that the Senators from Oklahoma are against disaster relief.
Again, the left isn't actually interested in facts or arguments. They're interested in their echo-chamber.
Notice how stupid this is:
“I think there’s a lot of hypocrisy involved here, Inhofe saying Sandy aid was corrupt but Oklahoma won’t be,” King told POLITICO.
Really?
How is that "hypocrisy"
Oh, clubdirt can't say.
scalabrine can't say
Rep King doesn't bother to say.
In fact, that is because it isn't hypocrisy, it is just sillly name-calling.
Which is what the echo-chamber likes.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
