70+K a year and only have to work 8 months a year. Not a bad gig
" ...It's an unfair pay increase policy based on the location of where they teach.."
This is the red herring argument that always stalls education reform. The solution is easy. On day one of the school year, you test the class. On the final day of the school year, you test them again. Hell, use the same effing test if you want. A good teacher's classroom will show overall improvement. Her kids are not being pitted against those in more affluent areas, just against themselves. And she (it's 5 to 1 females, which is another part of the problem) is being evaluated against herself. Seems fair to me.
" ...It's an unfair pay increase policy based on the location of where they teach.."
This is the red herring argument that always stalls education reform. The solution is easy. On day one of the school year, you test the class. On the final day of the school year, you test them again. Hell, use the same effing test if you want. A good teacher's classroom will show overall improvement. Her kids are not being pitted against those in more affluent areas, just against themselves. And she (it's 5 to 1 females, which is another part of the problem) is being evaluated against herself. Seems fair to me.
This is the red herring argument that always stalls education reform. The solution is easy. On day one of the school year, you test the class. On the final day of the school year, you test them again. Hell, use the same effing test if you want. A good teacher's classroom will show overall improvement. Her kids are not being pitted against those in more affluent areas, just against themselves. And she (it's 5 to 1 females, which is another part of the problem) is being evaluated against herself. Seems fair to me.
This is the red herring argument that always stalls education reform. The solution is easy. On day one of the school year, you test the class. On the final day of the school year, you test them again. Hell, use the same effing test if you want. A good teacher's classroom will show overall improvement. Her kids are not being pitted against those in more affluent areas, just against themselves. And she (it's 5 to 1 females, which is another part of the problem) is being evaluated against herself. Seems fair to me.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.