My Trade

I posted this in another thread but thought I would make it separate as I would like some of the regulars to chime in on this for me

Thanks

Ok boys here it is quite a stir in my league with my trade that went down
I offered as I was saying in my previous posts to this that I was offering up  one of my 5 qb's I have on my roster to a QB deprived team well someone bit on one of my offers here it is

Gore and K.Walter to me
for
Chambers and Pennington to him

low ball offer? call it what you will I'm Italian and don't lkike paying full price where ever I go..hahah

he had crap at wr and since we start 2 QB's his first one is ELI but his next 3 are V.Young, Igor Orlovsky, Kitna so Pennington would be his #2/3 if and when Kitna returns

Do I think I got the better of the deal, yes but he was dealing out of need at QB since he already has jacobs nd Turner as his starters at rb

Anyways long story short we don't have voting on trades b/c guys usually vote based on how the trade affects them not the 2 teams involved but we are quite the rowdy bunch and probably take FF to seriously so never has there been this many F bombs on the site
has your league ever had to deal with this sort of uproar if so how was it handled

I agree but at the same time I didnt hold a gun to his head and since this is head to head fantasy any given week the best team can lose if it was total point accumulated then it would be different

DeAngelo Williams was better than every other back last week
he could of gone up against a team that had Addai and LT and assuming the rest of the guys team had average weeks he would have won so the paper champ doesnt always win

as far as voting the problem we have is everyone votes on trades based on how the trade affects their position not the trade itself

I agree NFH, so based on your criteria the trade was done in good faith and there was no form of collusion and he was not tanking it since he was 4-1 going into this week which made the trade go down much easier actually it would have hurt him more to have had to use Orlovsky this week instead of Pennington had it been a guy at the bottom then maybe it would look more fishy.

I just think vetoing deals although the idea seems good it never gets done the way it is supposed to be