OSU has an experienced OLine + Jacquizz, so at first I thought they could keep this game close and cover the 9, but then I recalled how they managed to keep CJ Spiller in check last year, save one long run + they pretty much stifled the potent BSU offense in the Fiesta Bowl, so there is no reason they can't do the same to OSU. But I wouldn't be surprised if OSU still can move the ball and put up some points. If anything, I think the "safe" bet, if one were to exist, would be the TCU team over. Unfortunately I think it will probably be as high as 28.5, but still, the OSU D has alot of question marks, and I could see the experienced TCU offense racking up some points. The final could be anything from TCU 34-10 to TCU 38-34.
0
Quote Originally Posted by D_Unit:
Oreg St will beat TCU. You heard it here first.
OSU has an experienced OLine + Jacquizz, so at first I thought they could keep this game close and cover the 9, but then I recalled how they managed to keep CJ Spiller in check last year, save one long run + they pretty much stifled the potent BSU offense in the Fiesta Bowl, so there is no reason they can't do the same to OSU. But I wouldn't be surprised if OSU still can move the ball and put up some points. If anything, I think the "safe" bet, if one were to exist, would be the TCU team over. Unfortunately I think it will probably be as high as 28.5, but still, the OSU D has alot of question marks, and I could see the experienced TCU offense racking up some points. The final could be anything from TCU 34-10 to TCU 38-34.
OSU has an experienced OLine + Jacquizz, so at first I thought they could keep this game close and cover the 9, but then I recalled how they managed to keep CJ Spiller in check last year, save one long run + they pretty much stifled the potent BSU offense in the Fiesta Bowl, so there is no reason they can't do the same to OSU. But I wouldn't be surprised if OSU still can move the ball and put up some points. If anything, I think the "safe" bet, if one were to exist, would be the TCU team over. Unfortunately I think it will probably be as high as 28.5, but still, the OSU D has alot of question marks, and I could see the experienced TCU offense racking up some points. The final could be anything from TCU 34-10 to TCU 38-34.
Are you saying you think OSU will be a 4 TD dog to TCU?? Please tell me you are joking...
0
Quote Originally Posted by lemonsky:
OSU has an experienced OLine + Jacquizz, so at first I thought they could keep this game close and cover the 9, but then I recalled how they managed to keep CJ Spiller in check last year, save one long run + they pretty much stifled the potent BSU offense in the Fiesta Bowl, so there is no reason they can't do the same to OSU. But I wouldn't be surprised if OSU still can move the ball and put up some points. If anything, I think the "safe" bet, if one were to exist, would be the TCU team over. Unfortunately I think it will probably be as high as 28.5, but still, the OSU D has alot of question marks, and I could see the experienced TCU offense racking up some points. The final could be anything from TCU 34-10 to TCU 38-34.
Are you saying you think OSU will be a 4 TD dog to TCU?? Please tell me you are joking...
Are you saying you think OSU will be a 4 TD dog to TCU?? Please tell me you are joking...
he's referring to Frog (Team Total)....
the bad habit of the beavs to no-show these type games makes it frogs or nothing.... under Riley.....at least one non-conf road beatdown.....or weak performance.... every year
It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BBallday10:
Are you saying you think OSU will be a 4 TD dog to TCU?? Please tell me you are joking...
he's referring to Frog (Team Total)....
the bad habit of the beavs to no-show these type games makes it frogs or nothing.... under Riley.....at least one non-conf road beatdown.....or weak performance.... every year
the bad habit of the beavs to no-show these type games makes it frogs or nothing.... under Riley.....at least one non-conf road beatdown.....or weak performance.... every year
Ah, team over.. yes that makes sense..
skimming posts
0
Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:
he's referring to Frog (Team Total)....
the bad habit of the beavs to no-show these type games makes it frogs or nothing.... under Riley.....at least one non-conf road beatdown.....or weak performance.... every year
the bad habit of the beavs to no-show these type games makes it frogs or nothing.... under Riley.....at least one non-conf road beatdown.....or weak performance.... every year
Yep.........the beavs have a bad habit of getting crushed in one of their 1st 3 games every year, although it's usually on the road vs a decent-good opponent. This game, unfortunately for them, fits that bill. Perhaps this being the 1st game for both teams will see them be a bit more prepared. Then again, they'll be breaking in a new qb.....on the road (hardly a neutral site)........hard to back them in this game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:
he's referring to Frog (Team Total)....
the bad habit of the beavs to no-show these type games makes it frogs or nothing.... under Riley.....at least one non-conf road beatdown.....or weak performance.... every year
Yep.........the beavs have a bad habit of getting crushed in one of their 1st 3 games every year, although it's usually on the road vs a decent-good opponent. This game, unfortunately for them, fits that bill. Perhaps this being the 1st game for both teams will see them be a bit more prepared. Then again, they'll be breaking in a new qb.....on the road (hardly a neutral site)........hard to back them in this game.
I think NC State may sneak up on teams in the ACC year.
As for Oregon St., all we hear about are the Rogers brothers, but the true catalyst that was overshadowed was Canfield. The Oregon St. passing offense and Canfield were real good and teams had to respect that, which made it easier for Quizz to run. Now that Canfield is gone the Beavers will rely on a Sophmore who has never started a game. TCU will stuff the box and focus on stopping Quizz and make the SO. Katz prove his ability. I see the Beavers losing by DD.
0
I think NC State may sneak up on teams in the ACC year.
As for Oregon St., all we hear about are the Rogers brothers, but the true catalyst that was overshadowed was Canfield. The Oregon St. passing offense and Canfield were real good and teams had to respect that, which made it easier for Quizz to run. Now that Canfield is gone the Beavers will rely on a Sophmore who has never started a game. TCU will stuff the box and focus on stopping Quizz and make the SO. Katz prove his ability. I see the Beavers losing by DD.
Yep.........the beavs have a bad habit of getting crushed in one of their 1st 3 games every year, although it's usually on the road vs a decent-good opponent. This game, unfortunately for them, fits that bill. Perhaps this being the 1st game for both teams will see them be a bit more prepared. Then again, they'll be breaking in a new qb.....on the road (hardly a neutral site)........hard to back them in this game.
would love to know wassup here......almost HAS to start the season very low key....with little emphasis on the majority of the non-conf schedule.....saving (usually)...depth thin team for conference run....
1st 5 games ATS >> 10-25
last 5 games ATS >> 24-11
'03 lost by 2 at Fresno...(-8') '04 lost by 19 at Boise ...(+7') '05 lost by 36 at Louisville....(+13') '06 lost by 28 at Boise...(+7') '07 lost by 31 at Cinn...(-3) '08 lost by 31 at Penn St ...(+15') '09 lost to Cinn at home...28-18 (+1')....tried to lose at UNLV......won by 2 (-6')......at year's end beavs were 22+ points better in PR
* missing the over in these 8 games by 129 points.....16/game !!!
It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
Yep.........the beavs have a bad habit of getting crushed in one of their 1st 3 games every year, although it's usually on the road vs a decent-good opponent. This game, unfortunately for them, fits that bill. Perhaps this being the 1st game for both teams will see them be a bit more prepared. Then again, they'll be breaking in a new qb.....on the road (hardly a neutral site)........hard to back them in this game.
would love to know wassup here......almost HAS to start the season very low key....with little emphasis on the majority of the non-conf schedule.....saving (usually)...depth thin team for conference run....
1st 5 games ATS >> 10-25
last 5 games ATS >> 24-11
'03 lost by 2 at Fresno...(-8') '04 lost by 19 at Boise ...(+7') '05 lost by 36 at Louisville....(+13') '06 lost by 28 at Boise...(+7') '07 lost by 31 at Cinn...(-3) '08 lost by 31 at Penn St ...(+15') '09 lost to Cinn at home...28-18 (+1')....tried to lose at UNLV......won by 2 (-6')......at year's end beavs were 22+ points better in PR
* missing the over in these 8 games by 129 points.....16/game !!!
I feel that Alabama will again win the SEC and could for the second year in a row play for the BCS National Championship. There is NO WAY that Arkansas is going to win the SEC title with a 10-2 record. Take it to the bank.
0
I feel that Alabama will again win the SEC and could for the second year in a row play for the BCS National Championship. There is NO WAY that Arkansas is going to win the SEC title with a 10-2 record. Take it to the bank.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.