Texas A&M +3.5
time for Mizzou to return back to earth.
I gave you a legitimate question and you act like this? We all can read numbers and your response is weak
I gave you a legitimate question and you act like this? We all can read numbers and your response is weak
@Last2thirst
You did not ask him a legitimate question. You did infer that his selection was based on a hunch and then pressed him to justify his selection to you by winning you over with his argument supporting his selection.
If you can read numbers, as you state we all can, then you would clearly understand why he selected Texas A&M as this is a buy low sell high classic “line play”.
AS
@Last2thirst
You did not ask him a legitimate question. You did infer that his selection was based on a hunch and then pressed him to justify his selection to you by winning you over with his argument supporting his selection.
If you can read numbers, as you state we all can, then you would clearly understand why he selected Texas A&M as this is a buy low sell high classic “line play”.
AS
@Last2thirst
Some ppl just bet the opening lines, which imo, tells the story. For instance, last season the jags beat the chiefs, in KC, on Monday night, moving them to 3-1, whole world watching, and Seattle lost that week moving them to 2-2. The following week the jags were home against Seattle, and the opening line was sea -3'. The books were begging for jags money. The play was Seattle. Seattle covered. There's a few of these lines a week in college and pro.
@Last2thirst
Some ppl just bet the opening lines, which imo, tells the story. For instance, last season the jags beat the chiefs, in KC, on Monday night, moving them to 3-1, whole world watching, and Seattle lost that week moving them to 2-2. The following week the jags were home against Seattle, and the opening line was sea -3'. The books were begging for jags money. The play was Seattle. Seattle covered. There's a few of these lines a week in college and pro.
