This wasnt originally posted by me.. found it somewhere else but wanted to share.
Hey everyone. Check this out. Last season I decided to play 1H unders in all bowl games. What I found out was that I was 19-15. Big whoop right, that's only +2.5 units. Well, I started digging further. December, the 1H unders were 16-7, in January, they were 3-8.
Not satisfied, I took it a step further. I looked at the 2H unders. I found out that games that went over the 1H total, mostly went under the 2H total. So, here's the gist, if you play 1H under and win, great. If you play the 1H under and lose 1 unit, then play the 2H under for 2.1 units. If you did this last year, you would have been 32-2 for 25.4 units. That's a little insane.
The two losses to this "system" last year was Baylor/Washington which had 59 and 64 points in each half and NC St/Louiville which hit the 2H over by a point. I looked back at 2010-11 bowl games. That season yielded a 28-7 record for 4.8 units. 2011-12 was too perfect, I wouldn't expect it continue. The breakeven point on this system is 27 wins and 8 losses. For each win, you cash a unit, for each loss, you'd lose about 3.3 units. Of course, you could modify it to win less profit with the 2H under if you wish or bail on 2H depending on how the game is going. Shootouts like the Baylor/Washington game might need to be avoided.
hope this helps us to be profitable over the holidays ![]()
This wasnt originally posted by me.. found it somewhere else but wanted to share.
Hey everyone. Check this out. Last season I decided to play 1H unders in all bowl games. What I found out was that I was 19-15. Big whoop right, that's only +2.5 units. Well, I started digging further. December, the 1H unders were 16-7, in January, they were 3-8.
Not satisfied, I took it a step further. I looked at the 2H unders. I found out that games that went over the 1H total, mostly went under the 2H total. So, here's the gist, if you play 1H under and win, great. If you play the 1H under and lose 1 unit, then play the 2H under for 2.1 units. If you did this last year, you would have been 32-2 for 25.4 units. That's a little insane.
The two losses to this "system" last year was Baylor/Washington which had 59 and 64 points in each half and NC St/Louiville which hit the 2H over by a point. I looked back at 2010-11 bowl games. That season yielded a 28-7 record for 4.8 units. 2011-12 was too perfect, I wouldn't expect it continue. The breakeven point on this system is 27 wins and 8 losses. For each win, you cash a unit, for each loss, you'd lose about 3.3 units. Of course, you could modify it to win less profit with the 2H under if you wish or bail on 2H depending on how the game is going. Shootouts like the Baylor/Washington game might need to be avoided.
hope this helps us to be profitable over the holidays ![]()
in general 2nd halves are opposite of 1st half happens all the time in totals in points. I always take a team who is losing by 14 or more in the1st half and bet them in second half ,same with totals in the nfl its a profitable angle also.
As far as this hick Tenn JED go drink some more moonshine .,If u dont like the thread ,start one up and gives us yourwisdom IDIOT![]()
in general 2nd halves are opposite of 1st half happens all the time in totals in points. I always take a team who is losing by 14 or more in the1st half and bet them in second half ,same with totals in the nfl its a profitable angle also.
As far as this hick Tenn JED go drink some more moonshine .,If u dont like the thread ,start one up and gives us yourwisdom IDIOT![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.