All Forums | College Football

**Randizzle's** NCAAF Week 8 *(42-13-3)(78%)(+66.2 Units)*

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15723
Posts: 143
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #1
Another successful weekend in the books. Although not as profitable as previous weeks, the goal was still achieved. Coming into this week, I am going to dig a little deeper and see where my mistakes were made this past weekend. Lines will come out shortly, and I will begin my thoughts for this week there. If you follow this thread, and enjoy football, feel free to chime in with input. Always interested too see another angle.
I want to make sure my plays are documented accurately, so Here is a recap of this season thus far:
Week 2:
Premium Play- Oklahoma -21 (5 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play- Georgia -24 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play- Kansas -20.5 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play- Texas Tech -10 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play- Iowa -26.5 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play- Oregon St. +16 (2 Units) (loss)
Opinions: None

Weekly Record:
Premium: 1-0-0 (+5 Units)
Regular Plays: 4-1-0 (+8.8 Units)

Week 3:
Premium Play: Georgia Bulldogs -6.5 (5 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: Maryland +15.5 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Missouri -26 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Ohio St. +12 (2 Units) (loss)
Regular Play: Wisconsin -2 (2 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Tar Heels +6.5 (2 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: USF -3 (2 Units)(Push)
Opinions: None

Weekly Record:
Premium Play: 1-0-0 (+5 Units)
Regular Plays: 4-1-1 (+7.8 Units)

Week 4:
Premium Play: Troy +21 vs Ohio St. (5 Units) (WINNER)
Premium Play: Navy +7 (5 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Louisville +4 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Iowa +1 (3 Units) (Push)
Regular Play: Vanderbilt +7 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Georgia -6.5 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Opinions: None

Weekly Record:
Premium Plays: 2-0-0 (+10 Units)
Regular Plays: 3-0-0 (+9 Units)

Week 5:
Regular Play: SMU +18 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: LSU -23.5 (3 Units) (loss)
Regular Play: Ball St. -17 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Louisville -2.5 (3 Units) (loss)
Regular Play: W. Michigan -3 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: UCF -4 (3 Units) (loss)
Regular Play: Nevada +4 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: SJST+3.5 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Opinion: SDST -11 (WINNER)
Opinion: Navy +17 (WINNER)
Opinion: BAMA +7.5 (WINNER)
Opinion: Indiana +8.5 (loss)
Opinion: Miami -7 (loss)
Opinion: Houston +10.5 (WINNER)
Opinion: California -26 (WINNER)
Opinion: Maryland +11 (WINNER)
Opinion: Florida St. -5 (WINNER)
Opinion: OK St. -16.5 (WINNER)

Cont'd thru week 7...........
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #2
Week 6:
Premium Play: None

Regular Play: Wisconsin +2 (3 Units) (loss)
Regular Play: Florida Atlantic +3.5 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Kentucky +16 (3 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: Iowa +7 (3 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: Vanderbilt +4.5 (3 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: Stanford+7.5 (3 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: Northeen Illinois +17 (3 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: Stanford/ND UNDER 48 (2 Units) (loss)
Regular Play: UAB +3.5 (2 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Marshall +3.5 (2 Units) (loss)

Opinion: Boise St. -24 (WINNER)
Opinion: Boise St. UNDER 56 (WINNER)
Opinion: Oregon St. +12.5 (WINNER)

Weekly Record:
Premium Play: None
Regular Play: 7-3-0 (+12.3 Units)
Opinions: 3-0-0

Week 7:
Premium Play: Florida Gators -5 (5 Units)(WINNER)

Regular Play: Oklahoma -6.5 (3 Units) (loss)
Regular Play: No. Illinois -10.5 (3 Units)(loss)
Regular Play: Wake Forest -2 (3 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: Kentucky +3.5 (-120) (2 Units)(loss)
Regular Play: Syracuse +24 (-125) (2 Units)(WINNER)
Regular Play: Troy -3 (2 Units)(WINNER)

Weekly Records:
Premium Play: 1-0-0 (+5 Units)
Regular Plays: 3-3-0 (-1.8 Units)

OVERALL YTD:
--------------
Premium Plays: 5-0-0 (100%) (+25 Units)
Regular Plays: 26-11-1 (71%) (+41.2 Units)
Opinions: 11-2-0 (85%)

Grand Total= 42-13-1 (77%) (+66.2 Units)


GL, Dizz
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 6697
Posted: #3
Very nice you should start playing your opinions as well
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #4
Games Im Reviewing:
(387)HOUSTON at (388)SMU +13 8:00 PM
(331)NEBRASKA -6.5 at (332)IOWA ST 12:30 PM
(349)PITTSBURGH at (350)NAVY +3 3:30 PM
(355)N CAROLINA at (356)VIRGINIA +6 3:30 PM
(403)FLA INTERNATIONAL at (404)TROY -7 7:00 PM
(385)SAN JOSE ST at (386)NEW MEXICO ST +3 8:00 PM
(377)BAYLOR at (378)OKLAHOMA ST -16.5 3:00 PM
(369)ARKANSAS +10 at (370)KENTUCKY 7:00 PM
(371)CALIFORNIA at (372)ARIZONA Pk 10:00 PM
(381)LSU at (382)S CAROLINA +3.5 8:00 PM
(357)TOLEDO at (358)N ILLINOIS -7 4:00 PM
(339)AKRON -3 at (340)E MICHIGAN 1:00 PM

These are games I'm currently reviewing. None are plays as of yet. Will keep you updated. I'm currently favoring the teams in Green.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #5
dude you didnt start posting till 9/15 and i only compared your week 4 numbers above with your week 4 post and here you say you went 5-0 where there you were at least 7-4....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #6
where are you referring too?
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #7
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #8
4-4 in college
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by TheBigBanger:

4-4 in college

I'm not trying to be an ass, but since you came in my thread trying to hate I will be........

Go ahead and click that link you provided and tell me if there is something you may have missed.....Go ahead....i'll wait.

When you get done, come back in here and apologize and let everyone know you a "Hater".

I'll be here waiting....

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #10
are you talking about how all your picks from before are on another website or whatever? i looked again and it still looks like you went 4-4 in college...
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #11
what did i miss
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #12
you didnt even play the same games you said you did:
 
then:
Buffalo +4 vs Baylor   Loss

Kentucky +7 WINNER

Houston -6 ½ WINNER

San Jose St. +3.5 WINNER
 Air Force +11 Loss

Texas A&M +3 Loss

 Michigan + 3 WINNER

Stanford +17 Loss

 

now:

Week 4:
Premium Play: Troy +21 vs Ohio St. (5 Units) (WINNER)
Premium Play: Navy +7 (5 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Louisville +4 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Iowa +1 (3 Units) (Push)
Regular Play: Vanderbilt +7 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Georgia -6.5 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Opinions: None

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #13
Lol....the link you provided...look at the sate....That post is from 2007...This is 2008....soooooooo....Where do you see that I posted that I went 4-4 in week 4...I would LOVE too see that information.....Again, thanks for "Hating"...atleast you are doing your job.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #14
i am sorry for my error, i wasnt expecting you to have only posted the first few weeks last year then pick up the week after you left a year ago haha. wasnt trying to hate just looks kind of shady when people dont post here then say they have a great record. bol though, try sticking around this time. if you are really that good you could be nice to have around
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #15
TheBigBanger
 
But GL two both of you this week!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #16
*to I hate making mistakes!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #17

Ok, in advance to all you wonderful people out there....I apologize for this post being so long, but this one post will show you how ridiculous people can be, and how jealousy will eat at you if not controlled properly.

 

So Here is the issue. "Thebigbanger" here thinks that my record is flawed (or actually wants all of you to think this). He is claiming that I posted a 4-4 in College Football in Week 4. Here is his quote of my previous post. You can scroll up and see this also.

 

 

"Posted: 10/14/2008 3:18:12 AM
you didnt even play the same games you said you did:
 
then:
Buffalo +4 vs Baylor   Loss

Kentucky +7 WINNER

Houston -6 ½ WINNER

San Jose St. +3.5 WINNER
 Air Force +11 Loss

Texas A&M +3 Loss

 Michigan + 3 WINNER

Stanford +17 Loss

 

now:

Week 4:
Premium Play: Troy +21 vs Ohio St. (5 Units) (WINNER)
Premium Play: Navy +7 (5 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Louisville +4 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Iowa +1 (3 Units) (Push)
Regular Play: Vanderbilt +7 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Regular Play: Georgia -6.5 (3 Units) (WINNER)
Opinions: None"

 

Now, that was his claim, while the latter part is true. I did sweep that week (I do like that you pointed out that, one good thing about a hater). But he is claiming that my plays were actually the first set of plays. It looks like he even edited the time and date I posted that in order to try and discredit me...

 

Unfortunately, anyone can look at the lines posted there and the lines from 2007 and they match up exactly. Guess he didnt think of that. Anywho, sorry for having to clear this up. But wanted all to understand my record is 100% Accurate and honest and COMPLETELY DOCUMENTED. Instead of hating you should Follow and make some money Banger.

 

Hate on brotha

 

To the rest Good Luck this week, let's try and cash.

 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #18
BigBanger-apology accepted....I just saw that you did after I posted that.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #19
did you not read my earlier response? honestly i still dont believe you are 42-13 on the year. the main reason for this, as i stated earlier, is because you have not posted all of those plays here. generally when people post records without the posts prior to gametime to back them up i take their records very lightly. as to me "editing the time and date you posted", wtf are you talking about?
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1314
Posted: #20
easy to say after you write an ode to hating big banger, and after you were getting onto me for hating too and i didnt even say anything bad. its all good though
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 79
Posted: #21
I have seen Dizz's plays on other sites. He is the TRUTHTELLER!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4801
Posted: #22
take it easy fellas.......

but as for ur picks.. 
i like the s. carolina and smu picks, but i'm favoring the other sides in all the other ones..

but best of luck to you buddy  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3721
Posted: #23
too much unnecessary drama.  now...onto your picks
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by captailor:

too much unnecessary drama.  now...onto your picks

 

That's what i'm sayin......

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by oahuboy808:

take it easy fellas.......

but as for ur picks.. 
i like the s. carolina and smu picks, but i'm favoring the other sides in all the other ones..

but best of luck to you buddy  

Those are just games i'm reviewing...no plays yet. But sorry to hear im oppo of you at this point....GL

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.