Posted:
#26
This thread is worthless without picks 
0
NCAA wk 2
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by GoBison:
Mega, I am very happy to tell you what in the Sam Hell happened to Iowa St LW. First, Cyclones had two key injuries, Farniok (center) and Brundage (wide receiver), in the first quarter. Farniok was described by the announcers as the heart-and-soul of the OL, and Brundage seemed to be Cyclones' primary deep threat. Also, ISU's best corner was ejected during second series for targeting. (I thought it was blatant, but Paul Rhoads on the sidelines either didn't like the call or he was giving birth.)
Second, NDSU settled down after a shaky first quarter (Bison had about 12 new starters including new QB, almost totally new coaching staff other than the DC promoted to head coach, etc.) and did what it always does (just ask Minn and KState) to mediocre to middling FBS teams--play fundamentally superior football, don't turn the ball over, and grind them down in the second half.
0
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by MEGALOCKS:
Colorado 17 UMass
Colorado 17 UMass
We have the fair line a bit lower but UMass is horrid.....Colorado led 10-0 vs Col St LW then folded....Scary sandwich game off Col St and first Pac 12 game on deck vs Arizona St at home.....Cant imagine Col not rolling these guys up but you never know.....waiting for the total may take a peek at under depending on the number....Umass if anything has a D with a bit of a pulse and no offense....May be a sleepwalk game here 
mega
was on BC. Wish I had bet more because you couldn't pay me enough money to watch it again. Just painful. BC efficient but they have the slowest, least dynamic offense I've seen since the Big 10 of the 1950s. UMASS truly pathetic again. BC d consistently blew through the O line at will. QB terrified. Missed open guys all day long. If Colorado gets a bit of a push, the results should be the same, if not worse, this week. Colorado not a great running team unless CSU def is THAT good, but way more dynamic than BC. Could see it getting out of hand if, of course, they show up. Even at fair value, it's hard to argue against fading the Secondmen.
0
Gonna bet em tomorrow and post. Time to dig through some trashy internet sites looking for the Purdue intel you #lazybiyotches wont feed me. 
Posted:
#40
Mega, I choose to lowly BC as beating the only team they will be favored against. UMASS is one of the worst teams in D1. Pitt has more talent across the board. The play is Pitt.
Wazzu -2 Nevada How do you not go with the Cougs in a shootout?
I'm interested your analysis on
S.Bama -1 Kent Lean to S.Bama
Missouri -6 Toledo Lean to the Tigers
Utah -10 Fresno St. Lean to the Utes
Kentucky -9 Ohio Lean to the Wildcats
Maryland -10 S.Fla Lean to the Terps
0
Posted:
#42
Flexit.
I agree with all 5 of your leans. 
I plan on posting something on all those games time permitting. Kentucky and Maryand are my favs. Missed the 10 on Kentucky so kicking myself. As far as Wash St I am in the minority but almost never ever play on one dimensional passing teams as favs. Nevada catching 4+ may get on my card I have fair line at 1. GL buddy
I plan on posting something on all those games time permitting. Kentucky and Maryand are my favs. Missed the 10 on Kentucky so kicking myself. As far as Wash St I am in the minority but almost never ever play on one dimensional passing teams as favs. Nevada catching 4+ may get on my card I have fair line at 1. GL buddyKnox. Thx for intel. 
Was great to see them tear it up wk 1. GL this wk.
Was great to see them tear it up wk 1. GL this wk. 0
Posted:
#43
First pick.....in this post...but first
FIRESIDE CHAT WITH MEGALOCKS
FIRESIDE CHAT WITH MEGALOCKSPull up a chair - snuggle up - no - and hear what MEGALOCKS has to say........
- and hear what MEGALOCKS has to say........Sorry we have had no plays so far.....we had 2 picked out - was gonna post - go run errands for an hour or two - and BOOM our lines were gone - Yes we could have posted the old lines but we ONLY post widely available lines at the time of posting - many dont do that - but we feel it is POINTLESS to post anything other than a line someone can actually get at a reputable shop......Its a public forum so people can do what they want - we just stand for INTEGRITY......not to mention DEGENERACY and EDGY GOAT PORN PLOTS........
First play
Navy -3
We have the fair line at -5.....Now we really think Temple can be a money maker this yr - finished the year strong last yr and started this yr with a bang.....What we did notice is that while Temple's D played very well - they forced 7 turnovers (+5 on the game) and on offense averaged 3 yards a carry and were only 2-17 on 3rd down....If you are gonna beat Navy - you are not going to get 7 turnovers - they are PLUS 52 the last 5 years combined in turnover ratio and have one of the smartest most savvy QB in the world - last wk's horrible pitch vs Ohio St notwithstanding.....Gotta beat Navy straight up homey....toe to toe....Temple does not see this offense often and their last meeting with Navy was 2009 so not going to quote any ancient trends....Bottom line - we like Navy off a loss - deadly last yr in that scenario - only laying a FG - to a team we have rated much worse than Navy - mind you - we have Navy rated very high...And they had a good game LW vs Ohio St - leading the 2H - Ohio St is still excellent and Navy deserves a lot of credit facing that DL and doing so well....Also we believe Navy will be able to MATRICULATE in the passing game and give Temple fits.....Only laying 3 - let's roll.....mega
0
Posted:
#44
Army 3.5 Barfalo (54)
The Bulls bring QB stud Veal Licatta on the road to face Army....We have the fair line right where it is....Army has a ton of OL and others listed on the injury report which probably means squat but could mean something ha ha...Has to be a no play for us since we have no idea how Buff will be with new RBs/WRs and sans-Mack on defense....We were hoping for a lower total in this one - crap - still lean a bit on over - no call on the side.
0
Posted:
#45
*** Licata **
Purdue 3 Chips (54)
Have spent way too much time on this one.....Still leaning Purdue - Their offense looked a lot better last wk - but I guess playing WM will do that.....Problem is that their D looked just as horrible as last yr and the QB apparently still throws every 3rd pass into the stands....and they have NDame next wk....Chips missing some firepower at WR.....veteran squad and a MAC team never overlooks a chance to beat a Big 10 team....Think line is a bit light but probably gonna take a pass....Could not find any good intel to push the opinion one more or another - over feels a bit tingly at 54 may come back to this later....pass for now
0
Posted:
#46
Stanford 2.5 USC 55
Play
UNDER 55
This was one of the games we referred to earlier - missed the line....Had a couple legitimate outs at USC 3.5 and took at break - come back and its freaking 2...WTF - threw my toaster through the TV and felt better......We still see value if it gets back to 3 have the fair line at pk em....Realistically tho - can't say it is a lockkkkkkkkkkk since Stanford is 20-1 SU home last 21......The good news is that we still like the under at this 55 number....Yes we are aware that USC runs a play every 3 seconds - like Oregon but four times as fast if you listen to ESPN.....but Stanford has an excellent and both teams feature young OLs....not to mention USC D is pretty freaking good as well.....Last 2 yrs games have been 20-17 and 21--14....We think both DL have advantages over the opposing OL which will keep the scoring down.....USC lit it up last wk but this wk they get a much much stiffer test....Think Stanford has the game plan and chess pieces to keep the tempo down.....In the last 3 yrs Stanford has given up more than 28 pts TWICE - an OT debacle vs Az in 2012 and 3 OT slugfest vs USC in 2011....USC as good as they are will probably score in the mid 20s and don't see how this game gets over 55 if that is the case.....GL mega
0
Posted:
#47
Purdue is a state school, located somewhere in Indiana. It has a history of producing good quarterbacks and bad football teams. The Boilers generally wear gold helmets, but sometimes don't. It is unclear as to why. We here at MaineRoad Sports Advisors(c) tend to believe that teams play better in gold helmets and have recommended to PU that they do so. We have yet to receive a response. Despite the fact that Purdue is largely an engineeering school, the women are generally fairly hot. We here at MaineRoad Sports Advisors(c) tend to believe that teams play better when their fan base is relatively hotter than expected. Purdue's band has a really big drum (we're talking REALLY big). We here at MaineRoad Sports Advisors(c) tend to believe that a team's play is generally inversely proportional to the size of its big drum (see, e.g, Colorado, Yale; and, more recently, Texas). We here at MaineRoad Sports Advisors(c) also like to cite a state that we made up - teams without directions in their names cover against teams with directions in their names 61% of the time. That makes Purdue -3 our No Direction Midwestern Team with Four Syllables in its Nickname Early Kick-Off Lock of the Week!
0
Hot Forum Topics
