CFP record is 7-2 - combined record is 14-10. Let's look at some numbers:
Miami 47 10 5 15
Miss 2 41 8 37
Miami opened up as 3 pt fav. currently 3.5 at most places (madduxsports.com) . Miami is better in Total Def at 10 vs 41 slight better in sagarin rank at 5 vs 8 and better in sched strength at 15 vs 37. While Miss is better in total off at 2 vs 47.
Game is being played on a neutral. When I look at Bowl games with opening lines of -3 along with similar scenarios/numbers - the game that this resembles the most is when Wisc played Oreg - Wisc opened as a 3 pt. fav lost to Oreg straight up 27-28. There was another game Okla/Miami Okla won 37-34. Three others were not close to the competitive level we have in this game.
My plays:
1. Miss. +3.5
2. Indiana - 3.5
Good luck all
5
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
CFP record is 7-2 - combined record is 14-10. Let's look at some numbers:
Miami 47 10 5 15
Miss 2 41 8 37
Miami opened up as 3 pt fav. currently 3.5 at most places (madduxsports.com) . Miami is better in Total Def at 10 vs 41 slight better in sagarin rank at 5 vs 8 and better in sched strength at 15 vs 37. While Miss is better in total off at 2 vs 47.
Game is being played on a neutral. When I look at Bowl games with opening lines of -3 along with similar scenarios/numbers - the game that this resembles the most is when Wisc played Oreg - Wisc opened as a 3 pt. fav lost to Oreg straight up 27-28. There was another game Okla/Miami Okla won 37-34. Three others were not close to the competitive level we have in this game.
CFP record is 7-2 - combined record is 14-10. Let's look at some numbers: Miami 47 10 5 15 Miss 2 41 8 37 Miami opened up as 3 pt fav. currently 3.5 at most places (madduxsports.com) . Miami is better in Total Def at 10 vs 41 slight better in sagarin rank at 5 vs 8 and better in sched strength at 15 vs 37. While Miss is better in total off at 2 vs 47. Game is being played on a neutral. When I look at Bowl games with opening lines of -3 along with similar scenarios/numbers - the game that this resembles the most is when Wisc played Oreg - Wisc opened as a 3 pt. fav lost to Oreg straight up 27-28. There was another game Okla/Miami Okla won 37-34. Three others were not close to the competitive level we have in this game. My plays: 1. Miss. +3.5 2. Indiana - 3.5 Good luck all
BoL on both those spreads, although I would try hard to avoid the hooks...
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheBuddah:
CFP record is 7-2 - combined record is 14-10. Let's look at some numbers: Miami 47 10 5 15 Miss 2 41 8 37 Miami opened up as 3 pt fav. currently 3.5 at most places (madduxsports.com) . Miami is better in Total Def at 10 vs 41 slight better in sagarin rank at 5 vs 8 and better in sched strength at 15 vs 37. While Miss is better in total off at 2 vs 47. Game is being played on a neutral. When I look at Bowl games with opening lines of -3 along with similar scenarios/numbers - the game that this resembles the most is when Wisc played Oreg - Wisc opened as a 3 pt. fav lost to Oreg straight up 27-28. There was another game Okla/Miami Okla won 37-34. Three others were not close to the competitive level we have in this game. My plays: 1. Miss. +3.5 2. Indiana - 3.5 Good luck all
BoL on both those spreads, although I would try hard to avoid the hooks...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.