you two crack me up. You both watch too much ESPN.
You want to pit them 1 against 1, 2 against 2, etc...? First of all, it cant be done, and wouldnt be fair, since there are 12 teams in the SEC vs 10 in the Pac 10...but lets look at the top 5:
USC vs Florida
Oregon vs Alabama
Oregon St vs Georgia
Cal vs Mississippi
Zona vs S Carolina
I like the match ups. Wouldnt be as lop sided as you think my friend. Too bad we will never get to see it.
0
you two crack me up. You both watch too much ESPN.
You want to pit them 1 against 1, 2 against 2, etc...? First of all, it cant be done, and wouldnt be fair, since there are 12 teams in the SEC vs 10 in the Pac 10...but lets look at the top 5:
USC vs Florida
Oregon vs Alabama
Oregon St vs Georgia
Cal vs Mississippi
Zona vs S Carolina
I like the match ups. Wouldnt be as lop sided as you think my friend. Too bad we will never get to see it.
Im so tired of this conversation...theres good and bad football in every conference. We are blessed to witness good teams such as Oklahoma, Florida, SC, Alabama, etc. Just enjoy football and shut the fuck up....who cares. People are biased because most time they dont research, dont know, or are just making ignorant statements with no valid reasoning. The conversation shouldnt be about conferences...its about teams. Boise State beat Oklahoma a couple years back...does that make the WAC better than the Big 12? No it doesnt...but goes to show that none of that shit matters come game time...its about who is the best team on the field that day!
0
Im so tired of this conversation...theres good and bad football in every conference. We are blessed to witness good teams such as Oklahoma, Florida, SC, Alabama, etc. Just enjoy football and shut the fuck up....who cares. People are biased because most time they dont research, dont know, or are just making ignorant statements with no valid reasoning. The conversation shouldnt be about conferences...its about teams. Boise State beat Oklahoma a couple years back...does that make the WAC better than the Big 12? No it doesnt...but goes to show that none of that shit matters come game time...its about who is the best team on the field that day!
you two crack me up. You both watch too much ESPN.
You want to pit them 1 against 1, 2 against 2, etc...? First of all, it cant be done, and wouldnt be fair, since there are 12 teams in the SEC vs 10 in the Pac 10...but lets look at the top 5:
USC vs Florida
Oregon vs Alabama
Oregon St vs Georgia
Cal vs Mississippi
Zona vs S Carolina
I like the match ups. Wouldnt be as lop sided as you think my friend. Too bad we will never get to see it.
Yeah, I'm basing my opinion on what Lou Holtttthhh and company tell me. I live in the South, but I watch just as much Pac-10 football as I do SEC football. Don't tell me I'm biased because my arguments make sense. You Pac-10 homers have hard-ons because of another USC home win over an overrated Big 10. I'll be the first to tell you USC might be the best team in the country, they're certainly capable of beating anyone at any time. But USC had their chance to make the national championship game, and ultimately the weakness of the Pac-10 is what cost them that chance.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ForDaLuvOfMoney:
you two crack me up. You both watch too much ESPN.
You want to pit them 1 against 1, 2 against 2, etc...? First of all, it cant be done, and wouldnt be fair, since there are 12 teams in the SEC vs 10 in the Pac 10...but lets look at the top 5:
USC vs Florida
Oregon vs Alabama
Oregon St vs Georgia
Cal vs Mississippi
Zona vs S Carolina
I like the match ups. Wouldnt be as lop sided as you think my friend. Too bad we will never get to see it.
Yeah, I'm basing my opinion on what Lou Holtttthhh and company tell me. I live in the South, but I watch just as much Pac-10 football as I do SEC football. Don't tell me I'm biased because my arguments make sense. You Pac-10 homers have hard-ons because of another USC home win over an overrated Big 10. I'll be the first to tell you USC might be the best team in the country, they're certainly capable of beating anyone at any time. But USC had their chance to make the national championship game, and ultimately the weakness of the Pac-10 is what cost them that chance.
Check USC out of conference schedule the past few years....they schedule anyone. They have played @ #8 Virginia Tech, Ohio State, @ #6 Auburn, Arkansas, Virginia, Notre Dame, @ Nebraska, @ #6 Kansas State, @ #14 Colorado.
In 2002 their first 3 games were Auburn, @ #6 K State and @ #14 Colorado. So dont give me this shit about the SEC. Do I need to bring in their out of conference schedule. USC never plays a Lousiana-Monroe or some of the other punk ass schools the SEC schedules. USC will schedule a Hawaii, BYU or some school on that level and those schools usually have at least fighting chance in hell.
0
Check USC out of conference schedule the past few years....they schedule anyone. They have played @ #8 Virginia Tech, Ohio State, @ #6 Auburn, Arkansas, Virginia, Notre Dame, @ Nebraska, @ #6 Kansas State, @ #14 Colorado.
In 2002 their first 3 games were Auburn, @ #6 K State and @ #14 Colorado. So dont give me this shit about the SEC. Do I need to bring in their out of conference schedule. USC never plays a Lousiana-Monroe or some of the other punk ass schools the SEC schedules. USC will schedule a Hawaii, BYU or some school on that level and those schools usually have at least fighting chance in hell.
Very very nice blacc....too bad they wont look at their own schedules..they are too blinded thinking they have the only tough conference in america, they never mention The Citadel, Ark St, Appalachian St, etc...look at every SEC teams schedule. They all schedule THAT game...its laughable...I live out here, I know they dont look out of their own conference.
I will say it...The SEC is very, very good...they just ARE NOT a step above everybody else....a few good teams and thats it....
0
Very very nice blacc....too bad they wont look at their own schedules..they are too blinded thinking they have the only tough conference in america, they never mention The Citadel, Ark St, Appalachian St, etc...look at every SEC teams schedule. They all schedule THAT game...its laughable...I live out here, I know they dont look out of their own conference.
I will say it...The SEC is very, very good...they just ARE NOT a step above everybody else....a few good teams and thats it....
I'm not talking about 2002, blaccsteel, I'm talking about THIS year, and the people that are discounting Florida's schedule. I also know that USC has no problem scheduling anybody, with games against Auburn, Arkansas, Texas, OSU, Virginia, etc. My point is that in the 2008 season, USC was unlucky in that they beat OSU with no Beanie Wells, thus taking a little luster off that W. Combine that with the road loss to Oregon State (who ended up being a quality team), no real impressive wins in conference, and it's hard to make a case for USC in the title game.
You could also say that the SEC teams don't get the luxury of playing Washington and Washington State, two teams that can barely comprehend the forward pass. That's an automatic two wins for every team in the Pac-10, and it's hard to find any team of that nature in the SEC.
Fordaluvofmoney - This argument is all in good fun, as I'm sure you know. I can see why people argue for the BCS because it gets people talking about the games late in the season, but a playoff system would take over March Madness as the biggest spectacle in sports, IMO. I just wish my Cats would step it up so my argument will be a little stronger
0
I'm not talking about 2002, blaccsteel, I'm talking about THIS year, and the people that are discounting Florida's schedule. I also know that USC has no problem scheduling anybody, with games against Auburn, Arkansas, Texas, OSU, Virginia, etc. My point is that in the 2008 season, USC was unlucky in that they beat OSU with no Beanie Wells, thus taking a little luster off that W. Combine that with the road loss to Oregon State (who ended up being a quality team), no real impressive wins in conference, and it's hard to make a case for USC in the title game.
You could also say that the SEC teams don't get the luxury of playing Washington and Washington State, two teams that can barely comprehend the forward pass. That's an automatic two wins for every team in the Pac-10, and it's hard to find any team of that nature in the SEC.
Fordaluvofmoney - This argument is all in good fun, as I'm sure you know. I can see why people argue for the BCS because it gets people talking about the games late in the season, but a playoff system would take over March Madness as the biggest spectacle in sports, IMO. I just wish my Cats would step it up so my argument will be a little stronger
Who should Florida have scheduled instead of The Citadel? I guess they should have found another non-conference bowl team to schedule, so they could have ended their season playing 8 straight teams that went to bowl games??
0
Who should Florida have scheduled instead of The Citadel? I guess they should have found another non-conference bowl team to schedule, so they could have ended their season playing 8 straight teams that went to bowl games??
At the time when the schedule is made...who knows about injuries and all that...if youre a # 5 team...Beanie Wells shouldnt be the end all be all....USC has a stable of backs! Its called recruiting!
0
At the time when the schedule is made...who knows about injuries and all that...if youre a # 5 team...Beanie Wells shouldnt be the end all be all....USC has a stable of backs! Its called recruiting!
USC would be the might give Alabama a game. I would have loved to see SC versus Fla because I think SC would have been favored. Then I could have loaded up on the moneyline and hit the sweet spot!
0
USC would be the might give Alabama a game. I would have loved to see SC versus Fla because I think SC would have been favored. Then I could have loaded up on the moneyline and hit the sweet spot!
to change the focus a little....man o man, is the Big 12 getting exposed or what?
I was on the first half over, so I just got hosed by ECU going deep on 3 straight plays, rather than kick a 45 yard FG. In all honesty, we have no business being in a bowl game. Our top WR and RB have been out for half the year, and we've been absolutely horrible since they went down.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ForDaLuvOfMoney:
Im waiting until your cats lose...
Nice win by Ole Miss...
to change the focus a little....man o man, is the Big 12 getting exposed or what?
I was on the first half over, so I just got hosed by ECU going deep on 3 straight plays, rather than kick a 45 yard FG. In all honesty, we have no business being in a bowl game. Our top WR and RB have been out for half the year, and we've been absolutely horrible since they went down.
Yeah, I'm basing my opinion on what Lou Holtttthhh and company tell me. I live in the South, but I watch just as much Pac-10 football as I do SEC football. Don't tell me I'm biased because my arguments make sense. You Pac-10 homers have hard-ons because of another USC home win over an overrated Big 10. I'll be the first to tell you USC might be the best team in the country, they're certainly capable of beating anyone at any time. But USC had their chance to make the national championship game, and ultimately the weakness of the Pac-10 is what cost them that chance.
not for nothin , but , can you tell me what difference was from yesterday's rose bowl and the last 2 nat'l title games when the sec teams beat osu was??
All 3 games were the same - all were over at halftime
No SEC team has yet to play Pete Carroll and USC for all the marbles so we don't know what will happen
0
Quote Originally Posted by jfio626:
Yeah, I'm basing my opinion on what Lou Holtttthhh and company tell me. I live in the South, but I watch just as much Pac-10 football as I do SEC football. Don't tell me I'm biased because my arguments make sense. You Pac-10 homers have hard-ons because of another USC home win over an overrated Big 10. I'll be the first to tell you USC might be the best team in the country, they're certainly capable of beating anyone at any time. But USC had their chance to make the national championship game, and ultimately the weakness of the Pac-10 is what cost them that chance.
not for nothin , but , can you tell me what difference was from yesterday's rose bowl and the last 2 nat'l title games when the sec teams beat osu was??
All 3 games were the same - all were over at halftime
No SEC team has yet to play Pete Carroll and USC for all the marbles so we don't know what will happen
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
you two crack me up. You both watch too much ESPN.
Thats the key Jflo...the arguing is what makes it fun...in the end, there is never going to be answer
Hot Forum Topics
