this makes me feel something is wrong.. like they did everything to make sure tulsa covered and to keep it under.. makes you think when you come on covers and the headline says book: heavy action on bsu & over..
Tulsa in the bank!
0
this makes me feel something is wrong.. like they did everything to make sure tulsa covered and to keep it under.. makes you think when you come on covers and the headline says book: heavy action on bsu & over..
Theres a old saying "If it's to good to be true, chances are It is!" that's my thought on my selection of boise tonite. oh well tomorrow new day new luck
0
Theres a old saying "If it's to good to be true, chances are It is!" that's my thought on my selection of boise tonite. oh well tomorrow new day new luck
the second half line told the tell.... anyone serious capper who watched that first half would tell you that the second half line should have been 7 at least and closer to 10. but boise -4.5-6?
the books were playing for keeps tonight...
0
the second half line told the tell.... anyone serious capper who watched that first half would tell you that the second half line should have been 7 at least and closer to 10. but boise -4.5-6?
sideline interference with 2 minutes to go in a game Boise and the WAC absolutely need to have a "contender" for the BCS......and people say there is no such thing as a fix
you think they try and fix a game by calling a 5 yard penalty when it's 3rd and 9, to make it 3rd and 4. that call had ABSOLUTELY ZERO affect on the outcome. it did nothing. except for moving the ball 5 yards forward, big deal. tulsa stopped them, got the ball back. no different than if they wouldn't have called anything. that's a weak argument for a fix.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ICAPSports:
sideline interference with 2 minutes to go in a game Boise and the WAC absolutely need to have a "contender" for the BCS......and people say there is no such thing as a fix
you think they try and fix a game by calling a 5 yard penalty when it's 3rd and 9, to make it 3rd and 4. that call had ABSOLUTELY ZERO affect on the outcome. it did nothing. except for moving the ball 5 yards forward, big deal. tulsa stopped them, got the ball back. no different than if they wouldn't have called anything. that's a weak argument for a fix.
Boise could have easily scored more... Last 4 drives.. didnt try... end of story.. I don't understand it
Me eaither.....bullshit IMO. I want to punch the Boisie st coach in the face for a few mins if i could .....who punts near field goal range early in the game and at the end in a crucial situation??? Thats not a winning approach. Its my own fault for hitting the submit button with -8 points attached to it....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wakko4Flacco:
Boise could have easily scored more... Last 4 drives.. didnt try... end of story.. I don't understand it
Me eaither.....bullshit IMO. I want to punch the Boisie st coach in the face for a few mins if i could .....who punts near field goal range early in the game and at the end in a crucial situation??? Thats not a winning approach. Its my own fault for hitting the submit button with -8 points attached to it....
I played college football, there is no fixing. Every game, every play is watched over and over and over again for preparation. Did vegas "fix" the Eagles, Giants, and Vikings game on Sunday? Stop betting if you think the games are being fixed.
0
I played college football, there is no fixing. Every game, every play is watched over and over and over again for preparation. Did vegas "fix" the Eagles, Giants, and Vikings game on Sunday? Stop betting if you think the games are being fixed.
i just want to believe in the integrity of the sport and players....i know there have been fixed games and of course they still happen, but just not in a game like this, we'll never know could only assume
0
i just want to believe in the integrity of the sport and players....i know there have been fixed games and of course they still happen, but just not in a game like this, we'll never know could only assume
I bet everyone who "saw" Vegas's trap tonight with Boise and the Under bet Tennessee Sunday Night, the Under Monday Night, and Arkansas St last night. Given how square the opposites were
0
I bet everyone who "saw" Vegas's trap tonight with Boise and the Under bet Tennessee Sunday Night, the Under Monday Night, and Arkansas St last night. Given how square the opposites were
I bet everyone who "saw" Vegas's trap tonight with Boise and the Over bet Tennessee Sunday Night, the Under Monday Night, and Arkansas St last night. Given how square the opposites were
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
I bet everyone who "saw" Vegas's trap tonight with Boise and the Over bet Tennessee Sunday Night, the Under Monday Night, and Arkansas St last night. Given how square the opposites were
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
