3-2 small profit still up big in the week
Winners all day inside
@cheech1972
We squeezed out a few bucks today but overall it's been a real good week thanks cheech. Looking forward to cheech time=winning
time in the morning![]()
@cheech1972
We squeezed out a few bucks today but overall it's been a real good week thanks cheech. Looking forward to cheech time=winning
time in the morning![]()
Cheech can do whatever he wants. Each day gets more laughable with people saying how he needs to explain his bets. My god people are soft. The guy can bet however he wants to bet. Take it or don’t take it. Some of the people whining sound like the hosts of The View.
Cheech can do whatever he wants. Each day gets more laughable with people saying how he needs to explain his bets. My god people are soft. The guy can bet however he wants to bet. Take it or don’t take it. Some of the people whining sound like the hosts of The View.
Wow what a thread…lmfao. It’s simple to me, if a Player lists wagers that don’t make sense to your methodology…Don’t open the thread! Right, helloooo?
I certainly won’t open a thread that states “WINNERS ALL DAY INSIDE”…let alone waste my time double checking a player too lazy to list juice.
It’s easy for me.
Wow what a thread…lmfao. It’s simple to me, if a Player lists wagers that don’t make sense to your methodology…Don’t open the thread! Right, helloooo?
I certainly won’t open a thread that states “WINNERS ALL DAY INSIDE”…let alone waste my time double checking a player too lazy to list juice.
It’s easy for me.
Wow what a thread…lmfao. It’s simple to me, if a Player lists wagers that don’t make sense to your methodology…Don’t open the thread! Right, helloooo? I certainly won’t open a thread that states “WINNERS ALL DAY INSIDE”…let alone waste my time double checking a player too lazy to list juice. It’s easy for me.
well you opened the thread being your posting in it.
Wow what a thread…lmfao. It’s simple to me, if a Player lists wagers that don’t make sense to your methodology…Don’t open the thread! Right, helloooo? I certainly won’t open a thread that states “WINNERS ALL DAY INSIDE”…let alone waste my time double checking a player too lazy to list juice. It’s easy for me.
well you opened the thread being your posting in it.
Wow what a thread…lmfao. It’s simple to me, if a Player lists wagers that don’t make sense to your methodology…Don’t open the thread! Right, helloooo? I certainly won’t open a thread that states “WINNERS ALL DAY INSIDE”…let alone waste my time double checking a player too lazy to list juice. It’s easy for me.
A Winners All Day title is a little cocky. I'd be a little more humble, but having said that he probably is up some decent units even when he gets
hammered on all the extra juice he lays buying points. He probably has to go 2-1 to win any money and 3-2 would most likely be a push for him.
Wow what a thread…lmfao. It’s simple to me, if a Player lists wagers that don’t make sense to your methodology…Don’t open the thread! Right, helloooo? I certainly won’t open a thread that states “WINNERS ALL DAY INSIDE”…let alone waste my time double checking a player too lazy to list juice. It’s easy for me.
A Winners All Day title is a little cocky. I'd be a little more humble, but having said that he probably is up some decent units even when he gets
hammered on all the extra juice he lays buying points. He probably has to go 2-1 to win any money and 3-2 would most likely be a push for him.
@IntenseOperator love this guy i dont think he know if hes coming or going
I know the difference between -$105 and -$150 Clark
@IntenseOperator love this guy i dont think he know if hes coming or going
I know the difference between -$105 and -$150 Clark
Come on you guys know that when cheech said he plays at a book with -105 lines he meant it's the regular line BEFORE he buys points not after he buys points.
Come on you guys know that when cheech said he plays at a book with -105 lines he meant it's the regular line BEFORE he buys points not after he buys points.
@the1toturn2
Sorry i forgot the period at the end of a sentence. You were clearly bored and having a bad day. When you make stupid, negative comments, you will get called out. Maybe next time cheech will let you know how many points he bought and at what price, that way all the retards will understand! Please, check my grammar.
@the1toturn2
Sorry i forgot the period at the end of a sentence. You were clearly bored and having a bad day. When you make stupid, negative comments, you will get called out. Maybe next time cheech will let you know how many points he bought and at what price, that way all the retards will understand! Please, check my grammar.
@wallstreetcappers
I get it, but nowhere does it say you have to justify the way you wager.
We all know he buys points. What is there to discuss if people don’t like that don’t bet it.
@wallstreetcappers
I get it, but nowhere does it say you have to justify the way you wager.
We all know he buys points. What is there to discuss if people don’t like that don’t bet it.
Good luck today cheech. Remember, we all need to know how many points ya bought, at what price, what book you play through, your social security number and 3 references. Thanks!! Just kidding. Keep doin what ya do!!
Good luck today cheech. Remember, we all need to know how many points ya bought, at what price, what book you play through, your social security number and 3 references. Thanks!! Just kidding. Keep doin what ya do!!
...
Posting plays that are not current lines is misleading as is posting a win/loss figure which is made up of high juice games, it makes the appearance of something that is inaccurate. If someone wants to buy points that is their choice as is people who do teasers or ML parlays etc, but there is no reason to bash someone who is asking for clear communication about what the poster is doing.
So in the case of Virginia on the ML the right thing would be to list the juice (-130) or whatever, if you bought Akron down 2-3 points then list the juice you paid. When you place a bet if you buy points or play a ML the book tells you the juice before you place the bet, so it is nothing to ask for transparency and be straight when posting a game.
A record made off high juice is not close to the same as without.
...
Posting plays that are not current lines is misleading as is posting a win/loss figure which is made up of high juice games, it makes the appearance of something that is inaccurate. If someone wants to buy points that is their choice as is people who do teasers or ML parlays etc, but there is no reason to bash someone who is asking for clear communication about what the poster is doing.
So in the case of Virginia on the ML the right thing would be to list the juice (-130) or whatever, if you bought Akron down 2-3 points then list the juice you paid. When you place a bet if you buy points or play a ML the book tells you the juice before you place the bet, so it is nothing to ask for transparency and be straight when posting a game.
A record made off high juice is not close to the same as without.
I'm going to post the line and juice for each play i make tailing cheech here just like i did with michigan st yesterday so you guys can easily follow along.
I'm going to post the line and juice for each play i make tailing cheech here just like i did with michigan st yesterday so you guys can easily follow along.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,605
-
Friday 09/11/2026
691
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
254,491
-
PART DEUX
225
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,598
-
9/11 Fast Cash Five 🤑🤑??
7,045
-
Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System?
27,851
-
Trump's legacy?
25,323
-
Happening just recently . . .
34,680
-
MLB [1967] TOTAL o4-105 (1H CLE GUARDIANS vrs 1H MIN TWINS)
1,790
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search

