• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Lions-Bills Early Leans
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Basketball

    Title Hoops

    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
    nropp11
    jim spector
    Quantum_Leap
    andreagassi6969
    composite
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 11192
    Posts: 58
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
     
    nropp11
    nropp11
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 7963
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 2:08 PM ET #26

    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    "How well does Kansas shoot from the perimeter? That’s how I see it. They aren’t the best perimeter shooting team, but they’re going to have ample opportunities against a team that doesn’t pressure like Kentucky."

    What exactly does this mean? How would Kentucky beat good perimeter shooting teams like Florida and Vanderbilt if they give them "ample" opportunities?


    Florida shot 6/27, 6/22, and 11/22 in the three meetings. Unlike Kansas, they have no interior defense or offense.

    Vandy shot 6/18, 7/18, and 8/21.

    Difference between Kansas and teams like Florida/Vandy is simple, and it's defense. Not just pressure, but the ability to block shots and defend the interior well.

    GL
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    "How well does Kansas shoot from the perimeter? That’s how I see it. They aren’t the best perimeter shooting team, but they’re going to have ample opportunities against a team that doesn’t pressure like Kentucky."

    What exactly does this mean? How would Kentucky beat good perimeter shooting teams like Florida and Vanderbilt if they give them "ample" opportunities?


    Florida shot 6/27, 6/22, and 11/22 in the three meetings. Unlike Kansas, they have no interior defense or offense.

    Vandy shot 6/18, 7/18, and 8/21.

    Difference between Kansas and teams like Florida/Vandy is simple, and it's defense. Not just pressure, but the ability to block shots and defend the interior well.

    GL
     
    jim spector
    jim spector
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2000
    Posts: 90
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 2:13 PM ET #27

    thanks
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    thanks
     
    Quantum_Leap
    Quantum_Leap
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2010
    Posts: 14521
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 2:17 PM ET #28

    Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


    Untrue.

    comes down to one player I suppose Whitey < Dieng; but Big East a tougher conference. Def FG % a key indicator (altered shots) and Louisville, Kty (#1) and Kansas (#2) all up there. Davis is the #1 shot blocker (and "alterer" --??).

    Do you see the under as a solid play with all these changing arc shots in a dome nonetheless, and truly awesome (short of a better word) defenses?

    Esp. if Kentucky gets up big, coupled w/ KU trying 3 ptrs--something they get minimal success from (not their regular offense).

    Any thoughts on the under here, sir?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


    Untrue.

    comes down to one player I suppose Whitey < Dieng; but Big East a tougher conference. Def FG % a key indicator (altered shots) and Louisville, Kty (#1) and Kansas (#2) all up there. Davis is the #1 shot blocker (and "alterer" --??).

    Do you see the under as a solid play with all these changing arc shots in a dome nonetheless, and truly awesome (short of a better word) defenses?

    Esp. if Kentucky gets up big, coupled w/ KU trying 3 ptrs--something they get minimal success from (not their regular offense).

    Any thoughts on the under here, sir?

     
    nropp11
    nropp11
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 7963
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 2:24 PM ET #29

    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    comes down to one player I suppose Whitey < Dieng; but Big East a tougher conference. Def FG % a key indicator (altered shots) and Louisville, Kty (#1) and Kansas (#2) all up there. Davis is the #1 shot blocker (and "alterer" --??).

    Do you see the under as a solid play with all these changing arc shots in a dome nonetheless, and truly awesome (short of a better word) defenses?

    Esp. if Kentucky gets up big, coupled w/ KU trying 3 ptrs--something they get minimal success from (not their regular offense).

    Any thoughts on the under here, sir?


    Think the under does hold value in the dome and with the interior defensive presence, but again, probably comes down to Kansas knocking down shots or not.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    comes down to one player I suppose Whitey < Dieng; but Big East a tougher conference. Def FG % a key indicator (altered shots) and Louisville, Kty (#1) and Kansas (#2) all up there. Davis is the #1 shot blocker (and "alterer" --??).

    Do you see the under as a solid play with all these changing arc shots in a dome nonetheless, and truly awesome (short of a better word) defenses?

    Esp. if Kentucky gets up big, coupled w/ KU trying 3 ptrs--something they get minimal success from (not their regular offense).

    Any thoughts on the under here, sir?


    Think the under does hold value in the dome and with the interior defensive presence, but again, probably comes down to Kansas knocking down shots or not.
     
    andreagassi6969
    andreagassi6969
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 20312
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 2:32 PM ET #30

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     
    composite
    composite
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 4418
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 2:32 PM ET #31

    Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


    Florida shot 6/27, 6/22, and 11/22 in the three meetings. Unlike Kansas, they have no interior defense or offense.

    Vandy shot 6/18, 7/18, and 8/21.

    Difference between Kansas and teams like Florida/Vandy is simple, and it's defense. Not just pressure, but the ability to block shots and defend the interior well.

    GL

    It sounds like UK did a great job defensively on great perimeter shooting teams.  So, I'm not sure what you mean that UK doesn't apply pressure D and so KU will have ample perimeter shooting opportunities?

    Whatever D that UK uses must be pretty darn effective vs perimeter shooting teams.  Perhaps it's not a full-court press or a ball-hawking D.  But that doesn't mean they poorly defend the perimeter shot.  If so, Florida and Vandy would've had better shooting games.

    For the record, I like UK.  KU wants to run and that'll lead to plenty of transition opportunities for UK.  I just don't think KU can keep up.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


    Florida shot 6/27, 6/22, and 11/22 in the three meetings. Unlike Kansas, they have no interior defense or offense.

    Vandy shot 6/18, 7/18, and 8/21.

    Difference between Kansas and teams like Florida/Vandy is simple, and it's defense. Not just pressure, but the ability to block shots and defend the interior well.

    GL

    It sounds like UK did a great job defensively on great perimeter shooting teams.  So, I'm not sure what you mean that UK doesn't apply pressure D and so KU will have ample perimeter shooting opportunities?

    Whatever D that UK uses must be pretty darn effective vs perimeter shooting teams.  Perhaps it's not a full-court press or a ball-hawking D.  But that doesn't mean they poorly defend the perimeter shot.  If so, Florida and Vandy would've had better shooting games.

    For the record, I like UK.  KU wants to run and that'll lead to plenty of transition opportunities for UK.  I just don't think KU can keep up.

     

     
    nropp11
    nropp11
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 7963
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 3:05 PM ET #32

    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    It sounds like UK did a great job defensively on great perimeter shooting teams.  So, I'm not sure what you mean that UK doesn't apply pressure D and so KU will have ample perimeter shooting opportunities?

    Whatever D that UK uses must be pretty darn effective vs perimeter shooting teams.  Perhaps it's not a full-court press or a ball-hawking D.  But that doesn't mean they poorly defend the perimeter shot.  If so, Florida and Vandy would've had better shooting games.

    For the record, I like UK.  KU wants to run and that'll lead to plenty of transition opportunities for UK.  I just don't think KU can keep up.

     


    Really, there are a few ways to look at it. I don't view Kentucky's defense to be ball-hawking or pressure-heavy. Others do, but I think it's a bit misleading, even on the broadcasting and expert level if you're watching any of their games. I'm sure they'll say it tonight, but that's their opinion, not mine. Good pressure defenses force turnovers, and I alluded to this in the Louisville match-up thread. Calipari coached teams don't force many, in fact the past two years they rank #293 and #297 in doing so. The Kentucky "pressure" is just a myth. The defense looks like they pressure b/c of the size they have. They don't want to guard the perimeter, they would rather force teams to the inside where they can block a shot (his defense has ranked top 10 the last three years in blocked shots).

    I guess to answer your question, the perimeter defense is effective against most teams b/c of size, not pressure. Florida brings in 5'8, 6'2, 6'3, of course they're going to struggle against 6'2, 6'7, 6'8 and whomever Kentucky throws out there. What Kentucky lacks in pressure, they make up for in size (#1 shot blocking team in the country). 

    The difference between Florida and Kansas is pretty large in terms of motion offense. One team shoots the three a ton without getting the ball to the interior (Florida), and the other hammers the ball in the paint, and doesn't shoot as many three's (Kansas). Which goes back to the initial point, and that's the fact that I expect Kansas to do a healthy does of at least attempting shots from the perimeter. They can go inside, but they aren't going to be able to focus on scoring there, and the offense allows the perimeter guys to re-adjust for those open jump-shots against no pressure. In terms of size, 6'3, 6'4, 6'5, and they get a bit bigger when a few more guards come off the bench.

    Really a tough game. Can probably make arguments on both sides, just think the game comes down to how well (and often) Kansas looks to get points from the perimeter.

    GL
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    It sounds like UK did a great job defensively on great perimeter shooting teams.  So, I'm not sure what you mean that UK doesn't apply pressure D and so KU will have ample perimeter shooting opportunities?

    Whatever D that UK uses must be pretty darn effective vs perimeter shooting teams.  Perhaps it's not a full-court press or a ball-hawking D.  But that doesn't mean they poorly defend the perimeter shot.  If so, Florida and Vandy would've had better shooting games.

    For the record, I like UK.  KU wants to run and that'll lead to plenty of transition opportunities for UK.  I just don't think KU can keep up.

     


    Really, there are a few ways to look at it. I don't view Kentucky's defense to be ball-hawking or pressure-heavy. Others do, but I think it's a bit misleading, even on the broadcasting and expert level if you're watching any of their games. I'm sure they'll say it tonight, but that's their opinion, not mine. Good pressure defenses force turnovers, and I alluded to this in the Louisville match-up thread. Calipari coached teams don't force many, in fact the past two years they rank #293 and #297 in doing so. The Kentucky "pressure" is just a myth. The defense looks like they pressure b/c of the size they have. They don't want to guard the perimeter, they would rather force teams to the inside where they can block a shot (his defense has ranked top 10 the last three years in blocked shots).

    I guess to answer your question, the perimeter defense is effective against most teams b/c of size, not pressure. Florida brings in 5'8, 6'2, 6'3, of course they're going to struggle against 6'2, 6'7, 6'8 and whomever Kentucky throws out there. What Kentucky lacks in pressure, they make up for in size (#1 shot blocking team in the country). 

    The difference between Florida and Kansas is pretty large in terms of motion offense. One team shoots the three a ton without getting the ball to the interior (Florida), and the other hammers the ball in the paint, and doesn't shoot as many three's (Kansas). Which goes back to the initial point, and that's the fact that I expect Kansas to do a healthy does of at least attempting shots from the perimeter. They can go inside, but they aren't going to be able to focus on scoring there, and the offense allows the perimeter guys to re-adjust for those open jump-shots against no pressure. In terms of size, 6'3, 6'4, 6'5, and they get a bit bigger when a few more guards come off the bench.

    Really a tough game. Can probably make arguments on both sides, just think the game comes down to how well (and often) Kansas looks to get points from the perimeter.

    GL
     
    composite
    composite
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 4418
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 3:06 PM ET #33

    Looking @ the Lville game, it  looked like Lville kept it close despite shooting 37% while UK shot 57% b/c of offensive rebounding.  They shot 20 more times than UK.

    KU doesn't seem as strong on the boards as Louisville.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Looking @ the Lville game, it  looked like Lville kept it close despite shooting 37% while UK shot 57% b/c of offensive rebounding.  They shot 20 more times than UK.

    KU doesn't seem as strong on the boards as Louisville.

     
    222bad
    222bad
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 10863
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 3:23 PM ET #34

    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    Looking @ the Lville game, it  looked like Lville kept it close despite shooting 37% while UK shot 57% b/c of offensive rebounding.  They shot 20 more times than UK.

    KU doesn't seem as strong on the boards as Louisville.

        Actually just the opposite.  Louisville had the large edge in offensive rebounds, UK's high percentage was just that, high percentage shots, and more of them. The scoring difference was largely from the foul line.  Louisville's advantage on their offensive glass was by design as the Cats didn't want to allow for easy transition scoring and instead of committing to crashing the glass, they got back on defense. Louisville shot a a low percentage because they didn't make as many shots, and with 13 shots blocked that reduced their shooting percentages after those extra offensive rebounds.   BOL
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    Looking @ the Lville game, it  looked like Lville kept it close despite shooting 37% while UK shot 57% b/c of offensive rebounding.  They shot 20 more times than UK.

    KU doesn't seem as strong on the boards as Louisville.

        Actually just the opposite.  Louisville had the large edge in offensive rebounds, UK's high percentage was just that, high percentage shots, and more of them. The scoring difference was largely from the foul line.  Louisville's advantage on their offensive glass was by design as the Cats didn't want to allow for easy transition scoring and instead of committing to crashing the glass, they got back on defense. Louisville shot a a low percentage because they didn't make as many shots, and with 13 shots blocked that reduced their shooting percentages after those extra offensive rebounds.   BOL
     
    PizzaBoyRick
    PizzaBoyRick
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 1569
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 3:28 PM ET #35

    Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


    Also have to point out here that Davis is finally going up against someone who blocks shots better than he does in Withey.


    Withey will be in foul trouble quick, he is too slow of foot to keep up with Davis.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


    Also have to point out here that Davis is finally going up against someone who blocks shots better than he does in Withey.


    Withey will be in foul trouble quick, he is too slow of foot to keep up with Davis.
     
    TheReignman
    TheReignman
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 1871
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 3:29 PM ET #36

     great analysis great picks much appreciated 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     great analysis great picks much appreciated 
     
    Quantum_Leap
    Quantum_Leap
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2010
    Posts: 14521
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 3:45 PM ET #37

    Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


    Really, there are a few ways to look at it. I don't view Kentucky's defense to be ball-hawking or pressure-heavy. Others do, but I think it's a bit misleading, even on the broadcasting and expert level if you're watching any of their games. I'm sure they'll say it tonight, but that's their opinion, not mine. Good pressure defenses force turnovers, and I alluded to this in the Louisville match-up thread. Calipari coached teams don't force many, in fact the past two years they rank #293 and #297 in doing so. The Kentucky "pressure" is just a myth. The defense looks like they pressure b/c of the size they have. They don't want to guard the perimeter, they would rather force teams to the inside where they can block a shot (his defense has ranked top 10 the last three years in blocked shots).

    I guess to answer your question, the perimeter defense is effective against most teams b/c of size, not pressure. Florida brings in 5'8, 6'2, 6'3, of course they're going to struggle against 6'2, 6'7, 6'8 and whomever Kentucky throws out there. What Kentucky lacks in pressure, they make up for in size (#1 shot blocking team in the country). 

    The difference between Florida and Kansas is pretty large in terms of motion offense. One team shoots the three a ton without getting the ball to the interior (Florida), and the other hammers the ball in the paint, and doesn't shoot as many three's (Kansas). Which goes back to the initial point, and that's the fact that I expect Kansas to do a healthy does of at least attempting shots from the perimeter. They can go inside, but they aren't going to be able to focus on scoring there, and the offense allows the perimeter guys to re-adjust for those open jump-shots against no pressure. In terms of size, 6'3, 6'4, 6'5, and they get a bit bigger when a few more guards come off the bench.

    Really a tough game. Can probably make arguments on both sides, just think the game comes down to how well (and often) Kansas looks to get points from the perimeter.

    GL

    Tyshawn Taylor went from 50 3 pt shots last yr, to 150+ this year. Therefore safe to say, the game depends on him. 35% from the arc...70% from the line. He will need a 15+ pt game. Might be a good prop, knowing they will ask him to shoot it, and whether behind a lot, or in a tight game, he gets the rock out there and free reigns.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


    Really, there are a few ways to look at it. I don't view Kentucky's defense to be ball-hawking or pressure-heavy. Others do, but I think it's a bit misleading, even on the broadcasting and expert level if you're watching any of their games. I'm sure they'll say it tonight, but that's their opinion, not mine. Good pressure defenses force turnovers, and I alluded to this in the Louisville match-up thread. Calipari coached teams don't force many, in fact the past two years they rank #293 and #297 in doing so. The Kentucky "pressure" is just a myth. The defense looks like they pressure b/c of the size they have. They don't want to guard the perimeter, they would rather force teams to the inside where they can block a shot (his defense has ranked top 10 the last three years in blocked shots).

    I guess to answer your question, the perimeter defense is effective against most teams b/c of size, not pressure. Florida brings in 5'8, 6'2, 6'3, of course they're going to struggle against 6'2, 6'7, 6'8 and whomever Kentucky throws out there. What Kentucky lacks in pressure, they make up for in size (#1 shot blocking team in the country). 

    The difference between Florida and Kansas is pretty large in terms of motion offense. One team shoots the three a ton without getting the ball to the interior (Florida), and the other hammers the ball in the paint, and doesn't shoot as many three's (Kansas). Which goes back to the initial point, and that's the fact that I expect Kansas to do a healthy does of at least attempting shots from the perimeter. They can go inside, but they aren't going to be able to focus on scoring there, and the offense allows the perimeter guys to re-adjust for those open jump-shots against no pressure. In terms of size, 6'3, 6'4, 6'5, and they get a bit bigger when a few more guards come off the bench.

    Really a tough game. Can probably make arguments on both sides, just think the game comes down to how well (and often) Kansas looks to get points from the perimeter.

    GL

    Tyshawn Taylor went from 50 3 pt shots last yr, to 150+ this year. Therefore safe to say, the game depends on him. 35% from the arc...70% from the line. He will need a 15+ pt game. Might be a good prop, knowing they will ask him to shoot it, and whether behind a lot, or in a tight game, he gets the rock out there and free reigns.

     
    DOVJAK
    DOVJAK
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 26036
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:03 PM ET #38

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     
    Quantum_Leap
    Quantum_Leap
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2010
    Posts: 14521
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:07 PM ET #39

    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    Tyshawn Taylor went from 50 3 pt shots last yr, to 150+ this year. Therefore safe to say, the game depends on him. 35% from the arc...70% from the line. He will need a 15+ pt game. Might be a good prop, knowing they will ask him to shoot it, and whether behind a lot, or in a tight game, he gets the rock out there and free reigns.

    Just looked at his Tournament stats. Yikes, he's 0 for 20 from 3 pt range. He hasn't hit even one. He was 0-5 vs UNC (not known for defending the perimeter). 0-6 vs NC State. How in the heck will he even get one in there vs Kentucky I do not know.

    The o/u is 1.5 for his prop. Over 1.5 3 ptrs = +120. I think the under might be worth a look. Can he hit 2 3 ptrs vs Kentucky when he hasnt hit one yet?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    Tyshawn Taylor went from 50 3 pt shots last yr, to 150+ this year. Therefore safe to say, the game depends on him. 35% from the arc...70% from the line. He will need a 15+ pt game. Might be a good prop, knowing they will ask him to shoot it, and whether behind a lot, or in a tight game, he gets the rock out there and free reigns.

    Just looked at his Tournament stats. Yikes, he's 0 for 20 from 3 pt range. He hasn't hit even one. He was 0-5 vs UNC (not known for defending the perimeter). 0-6 vs NC State. How in the heck will he even get one in there vs Kentucky I do not know.

    The o/u is 1.5 for his prop. Over 1.5 3 ptrs = +120. I think the under might be worth a look. Can he hit 2 3 ptrs vs Kentucky when he hasnt hit one yet?

     
    krh7
    krh7
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 18
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:08 PM ET #40

    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    Tyshawn Taylor went from 50 3 pt shots last yr, to 150+ this year. Therefore safe to say, the game depends on him. 35% from the arc...70% from the line. He will need a 15+ pt game. Might be a good prop, knowing they will ask him to shoot it, and whether behind a lot, or in a tight game, he gets the rock out there and free reigns.


    interesting idea.  5dimes has taylor over 14.5 pts at -125, and over 1.5 3 pointers at +120.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    Tyshawn Taylor went from 50 3 pt shots last yr, to 150+ this year. Therefore safe to say, the game depends on him. 35% from the arc...70% from the line. He will need a 15+ pt game. Might be a good prop, knowing they will ask him to shoot it, and whether behind a lot, or in a tight game, he gets the rock out there and free reigns.


    interesting idea.  5dimes has taylor over 14.5 pts at -125, and over 1.5 3 pointers at +120.
     
    rarejerbear
    rarejerbear
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2005
    Posts: 73
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:17 PM ET #41

       Very nice write-ups by all of you guys but what NRopp11 hasn't talked about is what happens if Ky doesn't make THEIR shots. Bill Self and his Jayhawks know, I'm sure, how difficult it can be to score against Ky in the half court offense, so it may be that Kansas will try and take advantage of fastbreak opportunities off missed shots before Ky can set up their defense. In the 1st half against North Carolina, Kansas fast breaked often and it wasn't until the 2nd half that Kansas slowed the game down and won going away.

       My point is is Kansas can play either style, slow or fast, and tonight, at least in the 1st half,  the assumption cannot be made that Kansas won't try and run on Ky. If the trackmeet style doesn't work, they'll then have to play a half-court game and will have to find a way to make perimeter shots, as NRopp has talked about. This probably would not favor the Jayhawks as they are only making 41.4% of all their shots and have made only 19 of 79 three point attempts since the big dance started five games ago. It would be very surprising to see them, all of a sudden, start making threes tonight in a Dome against the No. 1 team in the country.

       In the end, I agree with NRopp, this is a tough game to call so maybe the best strategy is to watch the 1st half with little or no money on it and then put in a significant 2nd half bet.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
       Very nice write-ups by all of you guys but what NRopp11 hasn't talked about is what happens if Ky doesn't make THEIR shots. Bill Self and his Jayhawks know, I'm sure, how difficult it can be to score against Ky in the half court offense, so it may be that Kansas will try and take advantage of fastbreak opportunities off missed shots before Ky can set up their defense. In the 1st half against North Carolina, Kansas fast breaked often and it wasn't until the 2nd half that Kansas slowed the game down and won going away.

       My point is is Kansas can play either style, slow or fast, and tonight, at least in the 1st half,  the assumption cannot be made that Kansas won't try and run on Ky. If the trackmeet style doesn't work, they'll then have to play a half-court game and will have to find a way to make perimeter shots, as NRopp has talked about. This probably would not favor the Jayhawks as they are only making 41.4% of all their shots and have made only 19 of 79 three point attempts since the big dance started five games ago. It would be very surprising to see them, all of a sudden, start making threes tonight in a Dome against the No. 1 team in the country.

       In the end, I agree with NRopp, this is a tough game to call so maybe the best strategy is to watch the 1st half with little or no money on it and then put in a significant 2nd half bet.

     
    nropp11
    nropp11
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 7963
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:18 PM ET #42

    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    Just looked at his Tournament stats. Yikes, he's 0 for 20 from 3 pt range. He hasn't hit even one. He was 0-5 vs UNC (not known for defending the perimeter). 0-6 vs NC State. How in the heck will he even get one in there vs Kentucky I do not know.

    The o/u is 1.5 for his prop. Over 1.5 3 ptrs = +120. I think the under might be worth a look. Can he hit 2 3 ptrs vs Kentucky when he hasnt hit one yet?


    Kid hasn't made a three in a dome in his life.

    Against the scheme as I alluded to in the analysis, Kansas was 26% from beyond the arc as a team. In those 11 contest prior to the tourney, Taylor was 19/48 in those games (39.5%).

    Since the tourney has started, he's 0-15 against "no-pressure teams", so that would make him 19/63 (30%).

    Like the idea, think it might hold value, but I also think this might be a case of him getting 5+ attempts. He's taken 5+ in nine of the fourteen games he's played against "no-pressure" teams. And might be a case if they're down early where he needs to get a few more attempts in a comeback-attempt.

    GL
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    Just looked at his Tournament stats. Yikes, he's 0 for 20 from 3 pt range. He hasn't hit even one. He was 0-5 vs UNC (not known for defending the perimeter). 0-6 vs NC State. How in the heck will he even get one in there vs Kentucky I do not know.

    The o/u is 1.5 for his prop. Over 1.5 3 ptrs = +120. I think the under might be worth a look. Can he hit 2 3 ptrs vs Kentucky when he hasnt hit one yet?


    Kid hasn't made a three in a dome in his life.

    Against the scheme as I alluded to in the analysis, Kansas was 26% from beyond the arc as a team. In those 11 contest prior to the tourney, Taylor was 19/48 in those games (39.5%).

    Since the tourney has started, he's 0-15 against "no-pressure teams", so that would make him 19/63 (30%).

    Like the idea, think it might hold value, but I also think this might be a case of him getting 5+ attempts. He's taken 5+ in nine of the fourteen games he's played against "no-pressure" teams. And might be a case if they're down early where he needs to get a few more attempts in a comeback-attempt.

    GL
     
    KansasCityEarl
    KansasCityEarl
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 512
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:24 PM ET #43

    Kentucky will do what Purdue did.....BOX OUT ROBINSON....the game will be close, so take the points .....with a small wager and enjoy the game........
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Kentucky will do what Purdue did.....BOX OUT ROBINSON....the game will be close, so take the points .....with a small wager and enjoy the game........
     
    motorcitymama
    motorcitymama
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2012
    Posts: 2702
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:33 PM ET #44

    Thanks for sharing for your expert analysis with us this year.
    You are excellent at what you do.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Thanks for sharing for your expert analysis with us this year.
    You are excellent at what you do.
     
    ZonaCats
    ZonaCats
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 3600
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:47 PM ET #45

    UK's defense is all about forcing contested shots which they have done all season/tourney. 

    The angle i've narrowed this matchup down to is not what KU will be able to do but what UK will or won't be able to do.

    And that's hit from 3. If UK hit's 40% or higher from 3, they win and cover. The only clear advantage UK has over KU is 3 pt offense vs 3 pt defense. 

    And we all know 3 pt defense is a mirage. So it comes down to can UK hit 3's? If so, they win big. If not, will be close and could potentially lose. 

    Also, based on halftime splits, am strongly leaning towards playing UK 1H and KU 2H. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    UK's defense is all about forcing contested shots which they have done all season/tourney. 

    The angle i've narrowed this matchup down to is not what KU will be able to do but what UK will or won't be able to do.

    And that's hit from 3. If UK hit's 40% or higher from 3, they win and cover. The only clear advantage UK has over KU is 3 pt offense vs 3 pt defense. 

    And we all know 3 pt defense is a mirage. So it comes down to can UK hit 3's? If so, they win big. If not, will be close and could potentially lose. 

    Also, based on halftime splits, am strongly leaning towards playing UK 1H and KU 2H. 
     
    DirtNap
    DirtNap
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 392
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:50 PM ET #46

    feel like Kentucky has too much talent for Kansas to hang close in the 1stH...take the Wildcats 1stH and parlay it with the 1H over for an easy profit...then you can enjoy the 2ndH. No answer for AD...period on both ends of the floor.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    feel like Kentucky has too much talent for Kansas to hang close in the 1stH...take the Wildcats 1stH and parlay it with the 1H over for an easy profit...then you can enjoy the 2ndH. No answer for AD...period on both ends of the floor.
     
    sg004591
    sg004591
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 3407
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:51 PM ET #47

    Hi Neil,

    Just want to personally thank you for all the insights and what appears to be an endless effort of research.....I have a long way to go to get to a level such as this, and can honestly say I never will, since I just don't have that kind of bandwidth to spare.

    But I do want to say thanks for all your efforts despite some of the lurkers who try to belittle your efforts at times....a winning season cannot be challenged .....ever!!!

    Hope to see you back next season.

    All the best

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hi Neil,

    Just want to personally thank you for all the insights and what appears to be an endless effort of research.....I have a long way to go to get to a level such as this, and can honestly say I never will, since I just don't have that kind of bandwidth to spare.

    But I do want to say thanks for all your efforts despite some of the lurkers who try to belittle your efforts at times....a winning season cannot be challenged .....ever!!!

    Hope to see you back next season.

    All the best

     
    waynechung
    waynechung
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 362
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:51 PM ET #48

    thanks for the insight and thanks for not forcing a play,so many people will load up on this game tonight,which as you've stated offers so little in line value. ps-GUYS,LISTEN TO BROTHER ROOP,BET YOU 25 OR 50 BUCKS AND JUST CHILL AND REALLY ENJOY THE GAME-better spots will come along,patience young jedi's !!!!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    thanks for the insight and thanks for not forcing a play,so many people will load up on this game tonight,which as you've stated offers so little in line value. ps-GUYS,LISTEN TO BROTHER ROOP,BET YOU 25 OR 50 BUCKS AND JUST CHILL AND REALLY ENJOY THE GAME-better spots will come along,patience young jedi's !!!!
     
    VietBlonde
    VietBlonde
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2010
    Posts: 681
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:52 PM ET #49

    nropp11,

    THANK YOU for a wondering season and for sharing on covers. 

    Greatly Appreciated and Hope all is well!!!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    nropp11,

    THANK YOU for a wondering season and for sharing on covers. 

    Greatly Appreciated and Hope all is well!!!

     
     
    capskip
    capskip
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 33526
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2012 - 4:56 PM ET #50

    Thanks nropp for all the great write-ups,and information on college baskets.Hope to see you on covers before next season.If not have a great summer......
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Thanks nropp for all the great write-ups,and information on college baskets.Hope to see you on covers before next season.If not have a great summer......
    All Forums | College Basketball
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,523 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 302,138 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,583 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/17/2026 656 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 275 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,276 Covers arrow
    • Trump lies so much. 21,485 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 28,958 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 2,996 Covers arrow
    • Thoughts That Come To You 2,286 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.