All Forums | College Basketball

Sweet 16 Friday

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 37139
Posts: 130
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 33531
Posted: #26
BOL
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 6676
Posted: #27
Im getting really sweet on Florida State - 4 and under 130. If you look at what these teams have been doing it screams under with FSU by 10 pts.

Parlay material written all over it.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 4635
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by slikstiks99:

 
Parlay material written all over it.

Never were more concise words spoken  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 4635
Posted: #29
1H Over Big East?

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 27694
Posted: #30
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 25392
Posted: #31

No problem PP.

I got buried last night. Actually 1-4.

55% in the post.

Too streaky this year in hoops. Big up runs followed by big down runs.

Best of luck.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 25392
Posted: #32

I think UNC has too much size and speed for Marquette...UNC should clean up on the glass. Marquette should wear down in the 2H with too much size and fast pace to deal with for 40 minutes. I like UNC to pull away with a DD win.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2921
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by BigEastExpert:

No problem PP.

I got buried last night. Actually 1-4.

55% in the post.

Too streaky this year in hoops. Big up runs followed by big down runs.

Best of luck.

 

A snapshot of the microcosm we dwell in...   respect BEE

BOL  bouncin back tonite

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 21567
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by PayED:

Look out for Marquette they gona cover that spread their zone defense could stop those big guys from UNC!!! Dont sleep on Marquette they are gd for that +4....



 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 16804
Posted: #35
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 857
Posted: #36
Marq. SU!!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #37
I like UNC big! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 1338
Posted: #38

Marquette has beaten bigger and more athletic teams that actually play defense.  It's Marquette or no play for me.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #39

I really thought Marq and Wash would be in this game. UNC lucky they caught Wash late.

Marq playing as loose as U Conn. Like Marquette's inside game.

Regardless, would be surprising for the BE wto get any member into the FF. Not with the two they now have left. Although both are in a great rhythm.

The survivor of this one gets Ohio State on a day's "rest."

GL

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55436
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by sleepingmidget:

Marquette has beaten bigger and more athletic teams that actually play defense.  It's Marquette or no play for me.



Whom are you referring too? I cant think of a single team than is bigger AND more atheletic......
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 582
Posted: #41
On the other sideeating popcorn
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 694
Posted: #42

Heels play no defense, and havent covered a game yet in tourney. they also struggle to make 3 ball. i ll wait and get marq at + 6 prob by game time. remember there bigs vs washington got manhandled , bunch of lightweights

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 3214
Posted: #43

..HAVE 2 AGREE....

2 FAV'S ,,,2 DOGS 2 NITE....

WILL VCU AND KY GET IT DONE..

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3216
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:



Whom are you referring too? I cant think of a single team than is bigger AND more atheletic......
Was thinking the same thing!!  WHO??....Nice hit on Uconn last night, i fell for SDST hype as well!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 1544
Posted: #45
GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 244
Posted: #46

 bro.  you'll bounce back. 

marquette has impressed me...but the fact that you are so confident in this game has made me step back and reconsider.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 16408
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by BigEastExpert:

I think UNC has too much size and speed for Marquette...UNC should clean up on the glass. Marquette should wear down in the 2H with too much size and fast pace to deal with for 40 minutes. I like UNC to pull away with a DD win.

 


i just don't understand how marquette is any different from miami, clemson, long island, washington...all of whom unc couldn't stop and thus couldn't cover on.

marquette actually has a better offensive than all those teams except wash.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 17565
Posted: #48

GL Big E

Tar Heels

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 18648
Posted: #49
i feel you there

GL tonight
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 58493
Posted: #50
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.