Should we have CT do a check?
YES,
I have a strong opinion on RI and under for the 1H 2H and the game total.
My xavier numbers indicate a 4 point differential (lower) than the books spread.
So in summary, I like RI, UNDER,UNDER and UNDER,
and I coulkd lean unvder for the Xavier game tonight, as my line is approximately 4 points lower than the books.
I simply can not list every game line and total, while I am working trying to finish the card. There are games which are very close like Ohio state and Tulsa, which would be superior (in my opinion), games to wager on than the Xavier game.
I am watching the line movement on my close games, but will unlikely post these on this site, as time just does not permit it.
I have a dinner engagement this evening, so I will put the rest of my wagers in, and probably not even watch any of the games!
A long way to go.
Shirley
YES,
I have a strong opinion on RI and under for the 1H 2H and the game total.
My xavier numbers indicate a 4 point differential (lower) than the books spread.
So in summary, I like RI, UNDER,UNDER and UNDER,
and I coulkd lean unvder for the Xavier game tonight, as my line is approximately 4 points lower than the books.
I simply can not list every game line and total, while I am working trying to finish the card. There are games which are very close like Ohio state and Tulsa, which would be superior (in my opinion), games to wager on than the Xavier game.
I am watching the line movement on my close games, but will unlikely post these on this site, as time just does not permit it.
I have a dinner engagement this evening, so I will put the rest of my wagers in, and probably not even watch any of the games!
A long way to go.
Shirley
You have me pegged.... I am a huge tax cheat... I need to do something to hide my Ponzi money. ![]()
You have me pegged.... I am a huge tax cheat... I need to do something to hide my Ponzi money. ![]()
Since we BOTH are totals specialists, why are we differing in our opinions on this game.
I have my personal 1H total 3.75 points that the books. if this number is achieved, or reached, I believe that it could even go a 1/2 point higher.
I am wagering over 2H Wake, regardless. As you well know, the work is done now, not at game time.
I enjoy your insightfulness. Thank you!
Shirley
Since we BOTH are totals specialists, why are we differing in our opinions on this game.
I have my personal 1H total 3.75 points that the books. if this number is achieved, or reached, I believe that it could even go a 1/2 point higher.
I am wagering over 2H Wake, regardless. As you well know, the work is done now, not at game time.
I enjoy your insightfulness. Thank you!
Shirley
NO, you're msiing my point. I am going to wager Wake OVER 2H during game time, of course. i am releasing my intentions on this site. I am already looking at many 2h plays tonight, as i believe my numbers will be sharper than the books (at least i hope so).
When you say you are on the books side, I don't get it. If they were as sharp as you give them credit for, you wouldn't be able to beat them. Since you are a winning player, you are living proof that my statement is true. We both know that their lines are beatable.
Anyway, I am sticking to my predictoin on this game. I am interested in your thoughts on how it will play out.
Thanks again fo your cogent response.
BOL to you
,
Shirley
NO, you're msiing my point. I am going to wager Wake OVER 2H during game time, of course. i am releasing my intentions on this site. I am already looking at many 2h plays tonight, as i believe my numbers will be sharper than the books (at least i hope so).
When you say you are on the books side, I don't get it. If they were as sharp as you give them credit for, you wouldn't be able to beat them. Since you are a winning player, you are living proof that my statement is true. We both know that their lines are beatable.
Anyway, I am sticking to my predictoin on this game. I am interested in your thoughts on how it will play out.
Thanks again fo your cogent response.
BOL to you
,
Shirley
NO, you're msiing my point. I am going to wager Wake OVER 2H during game time, of course. i am releasing my intentions on this site. I am already looking at many 2h plays tonight, as i believe my numbers will be sharper than the books (at least i hope so).
When you say you are on the books side, I don't get it. If they were as sharp as you give them credit for, you wouldn't be able to beat them. Since you are a winning player, you are living proof that my statement is true. We both know that their lines are beatable.
Anyway, I am sticking to my predictoin on this game. I am interested in your thoughts on how it will play out.
Thanks again fo your cogent response.
BOL to you
,
Shirley
NO, you're msiing my point. I am going to wager Wake OVER 2H during game time, of course. i am releasing my intentions on this site. I am already looking at many 2h plays tonight, as i believe my numbers will be sharper than the books (at least i hope so).
When you say you are on the books side, I don't get it. If they were as sharp as you give them credit for, you wouldn't be able to beat them. Since you are a winning player, you are living proof that my statement is true. We both know that their lines are beatable.
Anyway, I am sticking to my predictoin on this game. I am interested in your thoughts on how it will play out.
Thanks again fo your cogent response.
BOL to you
,
Shirley
The rest of my plays:
1) richmond OVER 132
2) JMU UNDER 61.5 1H
3) Drexel OVER 59.5 1H
4) N Mex OVER 67 1H
5) Texas UNDER 132
6) St. Louis UNDER 121.5
7) Umass UNDER 132.5
8) Mizz St. UNDER 59.5 1H
9) Lasalle UNDER 159.5
These are in addition to previously posted plays.
Please note that we have received a couple of favorable line moves in earlier games,
I also eliminated the Eastern carolina game line for record keeping (and wagering), and added Wake Forest 2H OVER.
BOL to all, and many thanks for the continues support.
I will put these on another new thread, so it's easily viewed.
BOL
Shirley
The rest of my plays:
1) richmond OVER 132
2) JMU UNDER 61.5 1H
3) Drexel OVER 59.5 1H
4) N Mex OVER 67 1H
5) Texas UNDER 132
6) St. Louis UNDER 121.5
7) Umass UNDER 132.5
8) Mizz St. UNDER 59.5 1H
9) Lasalle UNDER 159.5
These are in addition to previously posted plays.
Please note that we have received a couple of favorable line moves in earlier games,
I also eliminated the Eastern carolina game line for record keeping (and wagering), and added Wake Forest 2H OVER.
BOL to all, and many thanks for the continues support.
I will put these on another new thread, so it's easily viewed.
BOL
Shirley

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.