tennessee st and Missouri st have played 4 straight on the road not 3 so not sure those 2 count throw them out you mentioned a team named Washington! You know Washington has two things going for them right? Golden Rule 1. 3 straight road games followed by being a home Fave that is a major conference team 2. They did not cover 8 in a row!! The 9 is the streak stopper!! I was going to wait right before game time to post this Cash Bonanza Play but since you found it I will confirm it to you as being the cream of the crop play! It doesn’t get better than this Washington will NOT win tonight... This is a cash bonanza fade..
This is classic....everyone please re read this completely...Angle has quickly read and MISCOMPREHENDED what the actual play is here because he was in a hurry...The play here is not Washington...the play is STANFORD...If you are following the system and doing the research for YOURSELF...you can clearly see Stanford is the play...Please....do NOT confuse others and yourself by not doing the actual WORK to confirm the play!...
This is so flipping classic...
1) Angel says essentially play Stanford as Washington will NOT win tonight
2) Smacks - lays into him... and begins a typical smacks sermon.. acting like some authority saying - do this, and dont do that...
The Hilarious part was - SMACKS HE HAD THE EXACT SAME PLAY AS YOU buddy. You both were saying play Stanford
But smacks isnt the sharpest tool in the shed... Always tripping over himself and acting like an authority when he certainly is not
I may be a temperamental emotional D-Bag prick (from time to time)... But when I go that place - my intent is not wrong...
This is typical Smacks that irritates so so many of the big boys
This all could have been avoided if you simply apologized to Angel, who is a good man... (your I will sit in the corner response to straights was no apology to angel)
And to be clear to all - Straights is saying Washington is the play. ie. Stanford is not the play... At the time of the exchange outlined above, it was unclear
2
Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:
Quote Originally Posted by angle2win:
tennessee st and Missouri st have played 4 straight on the road not 3 so not sure those 2 count throw them out you mentioned a team named Washington! You know Washington has two things going for them right? Golden Rule 1. 3 straight road games followed by being a home Fave that is a major conference team 2. They did not cover 8 in a row!! The 9 is the streak stopper!! I was going to wait right before game time to post this Cash Bonanza Play but since you found it I will confirm it to you as being the cream of the crop play! It doesn’t get better than this Washington will NOT win tonight... This is a cash bonanza fade..
This is classic....everyone please re read this completely...Angle has quickly read and MISCOMPREHENDED what the actual play is here because he was in a hurry...The play here is not Washington...the play is STANFORD...If you are following the system and doing the research for YOURSELF...you can clearly see Stanford is the play...Please....do NOT confuse others and yourself by not doing the actual WORK to confirm the play!...
This is so flipping classic...
1) Angel says essentially play Stanford as Washington will NOT win tonight
2) Smacks - lays into him... and begins a typical smacks sermon.. acting like some authority saying - do this, and dont do that...
The Hilarious part was - SMACKS HE HAD THE EXACT SAME PLAY AS YOU buddy. You both were saying play Stanford
But smacks isnt the sharpest tool in the shed... Always tripping over himself and acting like an authority when he certainly is not
I may be a temperamental emotional D-Bag prick (from time to time)... But when I go that place - my intent is not wrong...
This is typical Smacks that irritates so so many of the big boys
This all could have been avoided if you simply apologized to Angel, who is a good man... (your I will sit in the corner response to straights was no apology to angel)
And to be clear to all - Straights is saying Washington is the play. ie. Stanford is not the play... At the time of the exchange outlined above, it was unclear
Buddy risked 1k for a $100.. Agree with SB on that. [Quote] My buddy is the runner for our local book (get 10% of losses from HIS clients that he refereed) and there's a "high roller" that does that all the time. Will gladly bet -2000, -3000 faves (mostly tennis) to win $100-200 with a $15k credit limit for an early "quick, sure" win.. OF course those -2000 faves lose here and there..
10%????????? Tell your friend he is a jackass. No one makes less than 25%. No one. And most people nowadays can even get on a 50% sheet!! You friend is getting highway robbed!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheSquare:
Quote Originally Posted by jaybucko:
Buddy risked 1k for a $100.. Agree with SB on that. [Quote] My buddy is the runner for our local book (get 10% of losses from HIS clients that he refereed) and there's a "high roller" that does that all the time. Will gladly bet -2000, -3000 faves (mostly tennis) to win $100-200 with a $15k credit limit for an early "quick, sure" win.. OF course those -2000 faves lose here and there..
10%????????? Tell your friend he is a jackass. No one makes less than 25%. No one. And most people nowadays can even get on a 50% sheet!! You friend is getting highway robbed!!
Buddy risked 1k for a $100.. Agree with SB on that. [Quote] My buddy is the runner for our local book (get 10% of losses from HIS clients that he refereed) and there's a "high roller" that does that all the time. Will gladly bet -2000, -3000 faves (mostly tennis) to win $100-200 with a $15k credit limit for an early "quick, sure" win.. OF course those -2000 faves lose here and there..
10%????????? Tell your friend he is a jackass. No one makes less than 25%. No one. And most people nowadays can even get on a 50% sheet!! You friend is getting highway robbed!!Hey Naka? Suck one, just my opinion. I don’t trust losers.
Quote Originally Posted by mgrdoc:
Hey Naka? Suck one, just my opinion. I don’t trust losers. [/QuoHey buddy no hard feelings but I wouldn't suck yours with SB holding it and smitten pushing Straight, my friend says, "10% of something is better than nothing.." and regardless, he's been doin it for years WITHOUT getting paid.. I don't want to associate a face with the book too.. Everybody remains totally anonymous..
How old are you? Grow up
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Quote Originally Posted by Nakamichi:
Quote Originally Posted by TheSquare:
Quote Originally Posted by jaybucko:
Buddy risked 1k for a $100.. Agree with SB on that. [Quote] My buddy is the runner for our local book (get 10% of losses from HIS clients that he refereed) and there's a "high roller" that does that all the time. Will gladly bet -2000, -3000 faves (mostly tennis) to win $100-200 with a $15k credit limit for an early "quick, sure" win.. OF course those -2000 faves lose here and there..
10%????????? Tell your friend he is a jackass. No one makes less than 25%. No one. And most people nowadays can even get on a 50% sheet!! You friend is getting highway robbed!!Hey Naka? Suck one, just my opinion. I don’t trust losers.
Quote Originally Posted by mgrdoc:
Hey Naka? Suck one, just my opinion. I don’t trust losers. [/QuoHey buddy no hard feelings but I wouldn't suck yours with SB holding it and smitten pushing Straight, my friend says, "10% of something is better than nothing.." and regardless, he's been doin it for years WITHOUT getting paid.. I don't want to associate a face with the book too.. Everybody remains totally anonymous..
It sounds like this streak rule is simply, cover or not cover 9 games in a row. A team won't cover 9 in a row (bet against them) and likewise a team won't not cover 9 in a row (but for them). And this has precedence over any other rule.
yea pretty much. There are exceptions but they are so rare. For example. Go look at Oregon. They play in same conference as Washington. Go look at what they did coming home after 3 straight road games!
Oregon won
0
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Quote Originally Posted by bobo451:
It sounds like this streak rule is simply, cover or not cover 9 games in a row. A team won't cover 9 in a row (bet against them) and likewise a team won't not cover 9 in a row (but for them). And this has precedence over any other rule.
yea pretty much. There are exceptions but they are so rare. For example. Go look at Oregon. They play in same conference as Washington. Go look at what they did coming home after 3 straight road games!
Oh and the play for Oh Smitten Oh Smitten I got a gift for you
My word
William and Mary
William and Mary is the team that has the 3 more players! The 3 more highly recruited players that they got better scholarship offers from William and Mary!
BAM!!! BAM!!! BAM!!!
1
Oh and the play for Oh Smitten Oh Smitten I got a gift for you
My word
William and Mary
William and Mary is the team that has the 3 more players! The 3 more highly recruited players that they got better scholarship offers from William and Mary!
Oh and the play for Oh Smitten Oh Smitten I got a gift for you
My word
William and Mary
William and Mary is the team that has the 3 more players! The 3 more highly recruited players that they got better scholarship offers from William and Mary!
BAM!!! BAM!!! BAM!!!
My lean may have just become a bet now. Thanks SB! I love Colorado -9.5 a lot as well. I might have to up my units bet on it.
Good luck with the rest
I turn my W's to M's, yeah I flip those.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Oh and the play for Oh Smitten Oh Smitten I got a gift for you
My word
William and Mary
William and Mary is the team that has the 3 more players! The 3 more highly recruited players that they got better scholarship offers from William and Mary!
BAM!!! BAM!!! BAM!!!
My lean may have just become a bet now. Thanks SB! I love Colorado -9.5 a lot as well. I might have to up my units bet on it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
