All Forums | College Basketball

NCAA plays

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4217
Posts: 59
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15576
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by GridironGems:

You still play Portland under even though Portland only scored 88 points in one of their last 8 and that Denver has not been playing much defense lately (not quite in the terms of GS or Sac, but still up there)...just need more explanation on the NBA totals instead of just looking at the last 5 and doing the opposite, because that would make a lot of plays each day





exactly
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 207
Posted: #27
Rag- Sorry to be one of the people to just ask about random games but In your opinion, do you thing Valp +6.5 is a favorable play?  Thanks in advance
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 368
Posted: #28
I was just wondering how it's a play since Portland only score 88 in one of their last 5 games.  How many games per night is it usual?  Just need more explanation please.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15576
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by MichFan34:

Rag- Sorry to be one of the people to just ask about random games but In your opinion, do you thing Valp +6.5 is a favorable play?  Thanks in advance



The play would be on SF. But too much support
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 207
Posted: #30
Do you mean Central Fla...thats prob it.  Well, already called it in...i'll keep the fingers crossed...Thanks again for your input
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1326
Posted: #31
san diego at 11 still a play?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 33232
Posted: #32
yes
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 10098
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by ragingstorm:

Chattanooga +12 should be plus 24

Play on Chattanooga will try to find more.

You think tenn chat should be a 24 pt dog?  They are only getting 12.5 so it's a play.?  So your system is just math fade with no account for who a team has played?   They have played Davidson, missouri, memphis, tennesse, and usc.  So you can see where their pts against will be high.  I cant see how this game could be a play in any system.  The line is dead on. imo

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by VegasMaxx:

You think tenn chat should be a 24 pt dog?  They are only getting 12.5 so it's a play.?  So your system is just math fade with no account for who a team has played?   They have played Davidson, missouri, memphis, tennesse, and usc.  So you can see where their pts against will be high.  I cant see how this game could be a play in any system.  The line is dead on. imo



There is no point in saying this at halftime down 15pts
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15576
Posted: #35
While we are rolling out 70% winners.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 368
Posted: #36
Ragin can you please explain your NBA so I can try to follow it also?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 10098
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by nbafan88:



There is no point in saying this at halftime down 15pts
im not that guy.  i mean regardless if that pick wins or loses.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 287
Posted: #38

agreed ragin!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 402
Posted: #39
wow.. what is chattanooga doing? seems like nothing at the moment down 20
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 10098
Posted: #40
If this is your system you will have a play on any two equal teams when one has played a much stronger scheldule,  anybody understand that? 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #41
Ragin,

Do you have san diego locked in?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15576
Posted: #42
Yea I do but this Chattanooga game is killing me. I HATE seeing people lose money because of me. Last week I was on fire and I have ZERO confidence right now. This Chatt loss and the Eastern Mich loss from last week were my most devastating. But oh well you cant win them all. I may go 0-4 tonight but ill go 4-0 the next two. Thats the way this system has been working if you've noticed.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 17
Posted: #43
Ragin-
your thoughts on Montana st?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 287
Posted: #44
the first day i started tracking this it was on fire...i think it went something like 6-0 on the day...and yesterday Charlotte was
keep up the good work ragin!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1326
Posted: #45
ragin, i cant get port under for game but can under for 1H at 48.5.  what do you think
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 207
Posted: #46
Well...if anything we still have SD and USC to go! 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15576
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by weimar74:

ragin, i cant get port under for game but can under for 1H at 48.5.  what do you think


To be honest im not sure. Im so fucked up that because I won so much last week that ill lose my ass now. I already said that though. We shall see how the rest of the night goes. Stick with it. Ive won for three years with this shit.

Portland under 99.5 is all I really can suggest.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #48
I'm confused.. how is USC the play and not Georgia tech?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 15576
Posted: #49
2-2 shitty
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1029
Posted: #50
Played those 4 and also kentucky -23 according to system. They had 25% consensus early
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.