***GWarner27's 2/8 NCAAB Picks (65-53-2 55.1% YTD)***

Question

&#x2B;6.41Dogs 36-31 &#x2B;2.61Faves 26-15-2 &#x2B;8.45Over 1-2 -1.20Under 0-0 &#x2B;0.001st Half 1-2 -1.20Halftimes 1-2 -1.15Team Totals 0-1 -1.10Buybacks: 0-0 &#x2B;0.00Posted records:2006-07: 68-70 (49.3%) -1.9792007-08: 153-142-4 (51.9%) -4.1412008-09: 144-142-2 (50.3%) -7.6572009-10: 141-136-4 (50.9%) &#x2B;1.2942010-11: 114-79-4 (59.1%) &#x2B;31.085Futures:2010-11: 2-6-1 -1.08U2011-12:California to win the Pac-12 (&#x2B;375): 0.5uNovember 23-17 &#x2B;4.53December 19-15-1 &#x2B;2.60January 17-20-1 -5.62February 6-1 &#x2B;4.90March 0-0 &#x2B;0.00April 0-0 &#x2B;0.00Notes:-Terps won SU, even with a fierce comeback and I thought a certain overtime to screw me when Andre Young got fouled on a 3 with :10.7 left-Shocked to see Purdue keep up with tOSU, but 9/13 so far from deep will do that-Not shocked the Gators lost bad on the road, who knows when they&#x27;ll make shots but when they do they&#x27;re tough-Creighton struggling with an awful schedule, but it doesn&#x27;t matter when everyone sucks this year

GWarner27 · Answer

&#x2B;6.41Dogs 36-31 &#x2B;2.61Faves 26-15-2 &#x2B;8.45Over 1-2 -1.20Under 0-0 &#x2B;0.001st Half 1-2 -1.20Halftimes 1-2 -1.15Team Totals 0-1 -1.10Buybacks: 0-0 &#x2B;0.00Posted records:2006-07: 68-70 (49.3%) -1.9792007-08: 153-142-4 (51.9%) -4.1412008-09: 144-142-2 (50.3%) -7.6572009-10: 141-136-4 (50.9%) &#x2B;1.2942010-11: 114-79-4 (59.1%) &#x2B;31.085Futures:2010-11: 2-6-1 -1.08U2011-12:California to win the Pac-12 (&#x2B;375): 0.5uNovember 23-17 &#x2B;4.53December 19-15-1 &#x2B;2.60January 17-20-1 -5.62February 6-1 &#x2B;4.90March 0-0 &#x2B;0.00April 0-0 &#x2B;0.00Notes:-Terps won SU, even with a fierce comeback and I thought a certain overtime to screw me when Andre Young got fouled on a 3 with :10.7 left-Shocked to see Purdue keep up with tOSU, but 9/13 so far from deep will do that-Not shocked the Gators lost bad on the road, who knows when they&#x27;ll make shots but when they do they&#x27;re tough-Creighton struggling with an awful schedule, but it doesn&#x27;t matter when everyone sucks this year

GWarner27 · Answer

Dog wins SU: 15&#xD;&#xA;Losses by &lt;1: 7&#xD;&#xA;Dog OT losses: 2guesses:Sparty 15Cuse 9UCF 2-3RICH 4Cincy 4AKR 5-6BAY 1-2Pitt 2FSU 11-12X 19-20UMass 3UVA 15-16TENN 10ARK 2-3USM 5WICH 9-10SLU 3-4MICH 3-4UNC 6-7Vandy 13WVU 7RUT 1leans (58-53):GTown &#x2B;9KU &#x2B;1.5

bogey533 · Answer

Mich laying 3 or 4 away at Nebraska. Mich has played 4 of 6 conference games away and this will be the last for awhile. Team like Mich needs to win a winable game like this on the road. Minny just beat Nebraska in Neb. and think Mich can do the same thing. Much bigger game for Mich than Neb. I think Neb will win again at home just dont think this is the right matchup.

GWarner27 · Answer

Nebraska is going to have trouble with the 1-3-1 as long as the wolves hit the glass. There is a good height advantage on the home side, but Michigan has the shooters while NU does not. It&#39;s always risky to back a jump-shooting team on the road, especially when the line is where it should be

mmac66 · Answer

I took Kansas today......Baylor is just an abyssmal defensive squad....they are so soft and that zone is just awful....Baylor may keep up but Kansas is going to score and score a lot. Both Kansas and Missouri just abused Baylor's "defense"

This may be a homer play, but not my typical homer play

GWarner27 · Answer

Lean your way, too.I think we are learning that Baylor isn&#39;t ready to take that leap yet. Their inside game is horrible despite a likely top pick in Perry Jones standing 6&#39;11&quot; yet playing like a 2-guard, which T-Rob will destroy. KU never shoots like they do at home when they travel, but the zone should give quite a few open shots either on the perimeter or after penetration.I probably want 3 points to play KU, but I don&#39;t like Baylor

Red_Bud · Answer

[F] 02/07/2012 - Jorge Brian Diaz out for season ( Foot )
I think he had 27 minutes
16 Pts
4 Reb
I think this hurts Nebraska
But you are right " It's always risky to back a jump-shooting team on the road, especially when the line is where it should be"

GWarner27 · Answer

Welp, would have been an easy 2-0 last night but I played neither...

Leans:

Ole Miss +8-- my record in the SEC has been better than any conference this year surprisingly enough. I like that the Rebs will go zone here because that will limit Renardo Sidney and probably push him outside his range though he'll still take the jumper. I fear MSU taking a bunch of 3pt shots and making them at home as I always do when I back a zone on the road, but my biggest fear is Ole Miss scoring consistently enough to stay in it. Their offense is anemic, plus they won't have the length advantage they often do when you consider Hood/Moultrie on their opponent. From the first meeting, the Rebs won as a 2-point home dog, but I didn't watch the game to see any disadvantages MSU cant fix at home.

VT +6-- why the heck are they getting six when The U just had a huge win in Durham in a game they controlled the entire time?? That may be why. I haven't hesitated to say how much I hate this VT team compared to what they were in previous years with Malcolm Delaney, but this is ridiculous. Miami has an advantage in Reggie Johnson due to his bulk and post moves. Davila can limit that, though. As for the rest of the Canes, Kadjii wants to stay outside and shoot jumpers then you can say the same for everyone besides Malcolm Grant. Larranaga wants a grind it out game and that's what he will get from VT. A similar problem to the Ole Miss thoughts is how in the world will VT score? Erick Green is on my fade list and the rest of the squad plays defense way before offense. Transition isn't really likely considering The U plays three PGs at a time, but VT won't post the small guys up anyways.

...thoughts?

***GWarner27's 2/8 NCAAB Picks (65-53-2 55.1% YTD)***

Hot Forum Topics

GWarner27's 2/8 NCAAB Picks (65-53-2 55.1% YTD)