They are indeed a play tonight to keep it rolling
query 1.) 63-36 ATS
query 2) 25-7 ATS
Why? I mean the meaning is everything. if it doesn't make sense than I don't care what the record is.
Why? I mean the meaning is everything. if it doesn't make sense than I don't care what the record is.
I don’t bet favorites much and I didn’t and won’t bet this game tonight.
I posted this for someone else’s info.
If you like Nebraska before I posted this, this should be confirmation for you.
If you are railing because I posted this is an actual play I would recommend it.
The issue with this play is I’m not consistently betting favorites so the long term ROI has zero chance of rebounding long term because I refrain from favorite forecasting.
This is merely support if you like Nebraska.
I have enough of a long term reputation here from 1998 that I don’t need to provide all the details. If this doesn’t sound right to you skip it.
Best wishes on yours
![]()
I don’t bet favorites much and I didn’t and won’t bet this game tonight.
I posted this for someone else’s info.
If you like Nebraska before I posted this, this should be confirmation for you.
If you are railing because I posted this is an actual play I would recommend it.
The issue with this play is I’m not consistently betting favorites so the long term ROI has zero chance of rebounding long term because I refrain from favorite forecasting.
This is merely support if you like Nebraska.
I have enough of a long term reputation here from 1998 that I don’t need to provide all the details. If this doesn’t sound right to you skip it.
Best wishes on yours
![]()
@Mskeets
Not always but I do wish you the best of course
There is nothing extraordinary about this play except the historical valuation. Just like many other qualifying historical valuation plays. This wins 52%-60% of the time (according to my records) and the query suggests it hits more often.
some are dependent on closing lines or the lines the site has posted.
This is a singled out play based on a thread I saw last week and wanted it to be noticed by a certain individual.
I mostly play top 25 totals under but with so many games and daily long lists. I don’t have the time to maintain and post a thread.
If you like it this play it is well supported. I would play it if I had more favorite plays on deck to balance out any loss.
I stay on the dog side so I don’t get stuck meandering my through picking games and avoid long losing streaks.
![]()
@Mskeets
Not always but I do wish you the best of course
There is nothing extraordinary about this play except the historical valuation. Just like many other qualifying historical valuation plays. This wins 52%-60% of the time (according to my records) and the query suggests it hits more often.
some are dependent on closing lines or the lines the site has posted.
This is a singled out play based on a thread I saw last week and wanted it to be noticed by a certain individual.
I mostly play top 25 totals under but with so many games and daily long lists. I don’t have the time to maintain and post a thread.
If you like it this play it is well supported. I would play it if I had more favorite plays on deck to balance out any loss.
I stay on the dog side so I don’t get stuck meandering my through picking games and avoid long losing streaks.
![]()
correct this is meaningless to some
to others it’s support. I posted to support an individual. If you’re not congruent you should be conservative and move on
![]()
correct this is meaningless to some
to others it’s support. I posted to support an individual. If you’re not congruent you should be conservative and move on
![]()
sometimes I agree with you but sometimes I have time and my kindness shows out.
just depends but I post what I like.
![]()
sometimes I agree with you but sometimes I have time and my kindness shows out.
just depends but I post what I like.
![]()
Over bettors a slice of the pie for you
rank<26 and season>2021 and month=1 and total<=153 and ou streak=-1. “and day” below
Avoid these overs on days Saturday Sunday and Monday and the overs hit at 50-17 from 2022 to today.
Todays OVER is UConn 132.5
Over bettors a slice of the pie for you
rank<26 and season>2021 and month=1 and total<=153 and ou streak=-1. “and day” below
Avoid these overs on days Saturday Sunday and Monday and the overs hit at 50-17 from 2022 to today.
Todays OVER is UConn 132.5
So the above is and ranked team that their last game went under but the over under streak is only one. Only games played In January are included and the total must be below 153.5.
So the above is and ranked team that their last game went under but the over under streak is only one. Only games played In January are included and the total must be below 153.5.
Convince covers to allow photo sharing and I would show more details.
it’s a pain to type all this out and explain. Daily
Convince covers to allow photo sharing and I would show more details.
it’s a pain to type all this out and explain. Daily
I guess if I had more time I could start a YouTube channel. So much on YouTube I don’t know if it’s worth the time and effort.
I guess if I had more time I could start a YouTube channel. So much on YouTube I don’t know if it’s worth the time and effort.
D and season>2020 and p:D and p:points<51 and month!=11 and month!=4 and p:H and day!=Wednesday
92-50 ATS play is ON :
AIR F +6.5
the opener was +9. Most likely the site I use for data will indicate a line closer to in on +6.5. Obviously the +9 at a standard juice would be a stronger ROI
In game betting would be a tool I use in this case and if Air F gets up early it’s no benefit, so pass
D and season>2020 and p:D and p:points<51 and month!=11 and month!=4 and p:H and day!=Wednesday
92-50 ATS play is ON :
AIR F +6.5
the opener was +9. Most likely the site I use for data will indicate a line closer to in on +6.5. Obviously the +9 at a standard juice would be a stronger ROI
In game betting would be a tool I use in this case and if Air F gets up early it’s no benefit, so pass
No play today but I’ll keep this here for reference
ATS 105-57
D and season>2020 and p:D and p:points<51 and month!=11 and month!=4 and p:A and site!=neutral and 3>ats streak>-4 and 4>o:ats streak>-3 and o:ats streak!=1 and day!=Tuesday and day!=Friday
No play today but I’ll keep this here for reference
ATS 105-57
D and season>2020 and p:D and p:points<51 and month!=11 and month!=4 and p:A and site!=neutral and 3>ats streak>-4 and 4>o:ats streak>-3 and o:ats streak!=1 and day!=Tuesday and day!=Friday
Basketball - NCAA - Virginia vs Louisville - | 612 Virginia/Louisville under 155 -115 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 07:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Miami Florida vs Notre Dame - | 618 Miami Florida/Notre Dame under 143½ -110 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 07:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Grand Canyon vs New Mexico - | 652 Grand Canyon/New Mexico under 143½ -105 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 09:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Florida vs Oklahoma - | 648 Florida/Oklahoma under 157½ -117 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 09:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Air Force vs San Jose State - | 661 Air Force +9 -115 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 10:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Virginia vs Louisville - | 612 Virginia/Louisville under 155 -115 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 07:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Miami Florida vs Notre Dame - | 618 Miami Florida/Notre Dame under 143½ -110 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 07:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Grand Canyon vs New Mexico - | 652 Grand Canyon/New Mexico under 143½ -105 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 09:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Florida vs Oklahoma - | 648 Florida/Oklahoma under 157½ -117 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 09:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
Basketball - NCAA - Air Force vs San Jose State - | 661 Air Force +9 -115 For Game | 01/13/2026 | 10:00:00 PM (EST) | Pending
I don’t bet on Notre Dame but that is an indicated play tonight
MIA FL IS 5-18 ATS
t:team=MIAFL and AC and line>-8 and day!=Thursday and day!=Friday and p:rest!=3 and F
I don’t bet on Notre Dame but that is an indicated play tonight
MIA FL IS 5-18 ATS
t:team=MIAFL and AC and line>-8 and day!=Thursday and day!=Friday and p:rest!=3 and F
I wouldn't play Air Force v anyone. Period.
But I did love a lot of your points about under betting on top 25 teams and days of the week betting. Pretty fkn sharp. I mat have to tail ya since we are both long in the tooth. I been here for 25 years or so under diff nics depending on how many computers go tits up and lose passwords.
I wouldn't play Air Force v anyone. Period.
But I did love a lot of your points about under betting on top 25 teams and days of the week betting. Pretty fkn sharp. I mat have to tail ya since we are both long in the tooth. I been here for 25 years or so under diff nics depending on how many computers go tits up and lose passwords.
It’s a play the ROI is legit and SanJose is the opponent.
There are plays that I know are better than others and as you know this AirFirce team isn’t it. Play it or pass or use bankroll strategies
It’s a play the ROI is legit and SanJose is the opponent.
There are plays that I know are better than others and as you know this AirFirce team isn’t it. Play it or pass or use bankroll strategies

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.