All Forums | College Basketball

E. Tennessee St vs Campbell

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7700
Posts: 342
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 5485
Posted: #1

E. Tennessee St (-1) vs Campbell

o/u 127

Tip at about 2:30 EST

Thoughts?  Opinions?

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 13626
Posted: #2
no  line for me yet rggggggggggg
I like ETS today man
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 5485
Posted: #3
I'm leaning on the over right now.  Trying to find some relevant stats for these 2 teams.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 25143
Posted: #4
Not many relevant stats found, they each own a blowout victory this year against eachother.  There's 2 things that were common...ETS will turn the ball over and they will rebound.  Seems whoever shoots the 3-ball better has been the deciding factor.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 26206
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by KBrick84:

Not many relevant stats found, they each own a blowout victory this year against eachother.  There's 2 things that were common...ETS will turn the ball over and they will rebound.  Seems whoever shoots the 3-ball better has been the deciding factor.

I agree and personally feel a total play is the way to go if you really want the action.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 359
Posted: #6
Campbell IMO has better 3 ball shooters..
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 25143
Posted: #7
Agrred, You'd need 16pts at every 5min interval.  ETS has averaged a turnover every 2mins in the first 2 meetings...if you assume that's 4-6pts every 5min interval for Campbell they'd basically need a 3-ball and lay-up during that 5min frame to do their part of the scoring....and the way these 2 teams jack up 3's Id have to think that's possible.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 164
Posted: #8
campbell better team
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 26206
Posted: #9
I'm gonna be short and sweet on this one and play a first half play on the total. That way if it's a painful experience it's over quick. 



E Tenn o58 1h    

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 5485
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by KBrick84:

Agrred, You'd need 16pts at every 5min interval.  ETS has averaged a turnover every 2mins in the first 2 meetings...if you assume that's 4-6pts every 5min interval for Campbell they'd basically need a 3-ball and lay-up during that 5min frame to do their part of the scoring....and the way these 2 teams jack up 3's Id have to think that's possible.

Good point.   I am betting on the over.  GL with your play.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 4453
Posted: #11

KBrick hit it right on the head.  This is ETS's turnovers and rebounding v.s. Camp's lack of rebounding but better consistancy.  Very tough game to cap and pretty much dead-even. 

IF, and that is a big IF, ETS can take care of the ball, I think they win. 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 25143
Posted: #12
ETS has no if's on the turnover front, you can almost guarantee 15-20...as that's where theyre consistently at each game.  They play fast and take chances...it leads to dumb mistakes and easy points for the other team...but along the way some of those passes and gambles get through and leads to ETS points.  If turnovers happen we want them to produce run outs & points, not dead-ball turnovers (Like passes OB or offensive fouls)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 6080
Posted: #13

HOWEVER,

since this is a qrter final game for the ATL. SUN championship. would ea team lose points to 1)nerves, 2)slower pace because of the importance of the game.

just thinking "in the moment" for these guys.

are there freshmen or others that would poop in their pants because of the importance of the game?

what the hell do i know? just thinking out loud.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 13626
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by tmpeus78:

I'm gonna be short and sweet on this one and play a first half play on the total. That way if it's a painful experience it's over quick. 



E Tenn o58 1h    



54 and 56 totals for the meetings this year then they scored a lot in 2H.
might be an under 1h over 2h game again
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 6080
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by WillyWonka:



54 and 56 totals for the meetings this year then they scored a lot in 2H.
might be an under 1h over 2h game again

great point.

so, why would we expect more scoring the 1H for this big game?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 94
Posted: #16

Is this a neutral site or at Campbell??

seems the home team wins big here????

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 26206
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by padre16:

great point.

so, why would we expect more scoring the 1H for this big game?


It's a daytime game, sloppy defense and lots of turnovers = lots of points
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 4453
Posted: #18
Neutral site.  You'd think Campbell would be favored by 2 or so.  This line is fishy IMO.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 6080
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by tmpeus78:


It's a daytime game, sloppy defense and lots of turnovers = lots of points

and, bad shooting?

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 26206
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by padre16:

and, bad shooting?

 


maybe, maybe not.  I'll take my chance on the over.  Again Im playing it small for fun.  I'm not trying to change your mind.  bol whatever you decide to play 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 6080
Posted: #21

thanks for your respectful, mature, measured, intelligent response.

pass that methodology on to the idiots we frequently put up with.

gracias.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 9
Posted: #22
Taking Campbell and the points but i agree line seems weird BOL
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 6080
Posted: #23

dang - my book doesn't list this game at all.

i guess i can't lose.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 1210
Posted: #24
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1887
Posted: #25
For Pizza and Beers I am taking the,

Over 126
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.