• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Basketball

    !!!! CBB Tuesday !!!!

    123 ... 678 Next Last»
    oddsbuster
    Kaka123
    Quarks
    cjay12
    Fortmax
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 39347
    Posts: 180
    123 ... 678 Next Last»
     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:12 AM ET #1

    92-67-2 ytd netting +238.8 units...
    11-12 (POD's) -16 units...

    1-0 on Monday  netting +20 units nailing another outright winner on a dog.  After Sunday i'm currently on a 19-4-1 run in the past 8 days on straight bet's netting +273 units & 34-14-1 since 12/03 on straight bets now netting a total of +292 units in 9 days work. As always here's yesterdays thread below...

    https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=40&sub=101208453&page=1


    Tuesday looks to have about 8 games on the wagering card. I've got my laptop in hand chilling in the Jacuzzi tub along with my pen and lots of paper. Getting ready to start reading right now. Be back shortly...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    92-67-2 ytd netting +238.8 units...
    11-12 (POD's) -16 units...

    1-0 on Monday  netting +20 units nailing another outright winner on a dog.  After Sunday i'm currently on a 19-4-1 run in the past 8 days on straight bet's netting +273 units & 34-14-1 since 12/03 on straight bets now netting a total of +292 units in 9 days work. As always here's yesterdays thread below...

    https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=40&sub=101208453&page=1


    Tuesday looks to have about 8 games on the wagering card. I've got my laptop in hand chilling in the Jacuzzi tub along with my pen and lots of paper. Getting ready to start reading right now. Be back shortly...

     
    Kaka123
    Kaka123
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 9003
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:15 AM ET #2

    Don't drop the laptop.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Don't drop the laptop.
     
    Quarks
    Quarks
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2011
    Posts: 762
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:27 AM ET #3

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     
    cjay12
    cjay12
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 68
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:29 AM ET #4

    Mississippi St -13.5... theyve been on a roll lately, covering their last 4 games. FAU is also ranked 250th in scoring defense in the country. I see an easy 20+ point victory for MSU. Thoughts?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mississippi St -13.5... theyve been on a roll lately, covering their last 4 games. FAU is also ranked 250th in scoring defense in the country. I see an easy 20+ point victory for MSU. Thoughts?
     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:30 AM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaka123:

    Don't drop the laptop.
    Got a nice breakfast in bed stand I made for it in my garage.It sits about 8 to 10 inches above the water. There is no better place for the work place to be...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaka123:

    Don't drop the laptop.
    Got a nice breakfast in bed stand I made for it in my garage.It sits about 8 to 10 inches above the water. There is no better place for the work place to be...
     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:32 AM ET #6

    Already seeing some advantages reading through all these box scores in the Dartmouth/IUPU-FT Wayne game. This is going to take a while so I'll be back in a bit...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Already seeing some advantages reading through all these box scores in the Dartmouth/IUPU-FT Wayne game. This is going to take a while so I'll be back in a bit...
     
    Fortmax
    Fortmax
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 757
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:34 AM ET #7

    You my friend live in the lifestyle of rich & famous.

    Good luck to you Sir OB !



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    You my friend live in the lifestyle of rich & famous.

    Good luck to you Sir OB !



     
    johntruong911
    johntruong911
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 190
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:44 AM ET #8

    I have two jobs... I will be up at 430am to place my beta thanks to u and it the door by 515! I see niAgra game going under and Michigan game going under.... looking forward to reading ur post... Didn't follows ur nfl picks and down for the day! Thank god for ur college pick and went under on Portland @ Org game... Down 260 mang! Ur opinion on Atl under for Thursday night? Rams under!!!!!! 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I have two jobs... I will be up at 430am to place my beta thanks to u and it the door by 515! I see niAgra game going under and Michigan game going under.... looking forward to reading ur post... Didn't follows ur nfl picks and down for the day! Thank god for ur college pick and went under on Portland @ Org game... Down 260 mang! Ur opinion on Atl under for Thursday night? Rams under!!!!!! 
     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:45 AM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by Fortmax:

    You my friend live in the lifestyle of rich & famous.

    Good luck to you Sir OB !



    One day, maybe. My Jacuzzi tub sits in just your average 1900 square foot house with 3 beds, 2 baths and my 2 car garage. My old house in Michigan I had a loft I built on top the garage for my man cave. Just renting right now in Ohio until the wife and I know if she is going to stay here long term. I'm just your average guy making more than the normal average size wagers on sports. Don't be fooled, i'm no Wayne Root and we are not going to be making millions doing this....



    BOL, time to get back to reading...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Fortmax:

    You my friend live in the lifestyle of rich & famous.

    Good luck to you Sir OB !



    One day, maybe. My Jacuzzi tub sits in just your average 1900 square foot house with 3 beds, 2 baths and my 2 car garage. My old house in Michigan I had a loft I built on top the garage for my man cave. Just renting right now in Ohio until the wife and I know if she is going to stay here long term. I'm just your average guy making more than the normal average size wagers on sports. Don't be fooled, i'm no Wayne Root and we are not going to be making millions doing this....



    BOL, time to get back to reading...
     
    troy9828
    troy9828
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2007
    Posts: 5042
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 12:51 AM ET #10

    Great stuff odds, u been hot lately good work. I'm from Ohio too, if u don't mind me asking.. Where u at in Ohio? Yet again u might be a Michigan fan lol
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Great stuff odds, u been hot lately good work. I'm from Ohio too, if u don't mind me asking.. Where u at in Ohio? Yet again u might be a Michigan fan lol
     
    ongxa15
    ongxa15
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2011
    Posts: 39
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 1:31 AM ET #11

    Appreciate all you hard work Odd. Good luck and hope you continue your streaks 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Appreciate all you hard work Odd. Good luck and hope you continue your streaks 
     
    Messier-11
    Messier-11
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 11184
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 1:37 AM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by Fortmax:

    You my friend live in the lifestyle of rich & famous.

    Good luck to you Sir OB !





    minus the ohio part
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Fortmax:

    You my friend live in the lifestyle of rich & famous.

    Good luck to you Sir OB !





    minus the ohio part
     
    CoverLane
    CoverLane
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 6903
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 1:41 AM ET #13

    Best of luck tomorrow odds.

    Let's keep these wins rollin' in!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Best of luck tomorrow odds.

    Let's keep these wins rollin' in!

     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:08 AM ET #14

    1st play is:

    Dartmouth@IUPU - Ft. Wayne over 136.5 for 20 units... It seems we have a situation here where a slow paced team meets the fast paced team. While Dartmouth is going to see many mid to 120's in their totals this season because of their 50.5 shots per game average IPFW is going to consistently see totals in the high 140's or even 150's as IPFW averages 63.5 shots per game. This is by far the fastest team Dartmouth has seen all season long as they have played against teams averaging 55.8, 52.1, 56, 53.1, 58.3, 56 & 54.5 shots per game. This is one of the main reasons you will see that Dartmouth is only allowing 62ppg on defense this season as their schedule has been a quite heavily in favor of slower to medium paced teams. Not to mention those teams that Dartmouth played are currently ranked in scoring offense as follows @ 175, 296, 266, 101, 209, 275 & 124. It's no wonder that Dartmouth is only allowing 62ppg against these numbers. IPFW comes into this game ranked 37th overall in scoring offense along with the already mentioned 63 and a half shots per game mentioned above. By far the fastest on highest scoring offense that Dartmouth as seen this year. It's also rather alarming that IPFW has allowed 5 of the 7 D-1 teams they have played this season to exceed their shot total per game average as here are their following opponents along with shot per game averages followed by the shots they attempted vs IPFW along with the score of the game.

    (@NEBO) avg 61.3spg had 73 shots (83-80ot)w
    (Valpo) avg 44.8spg had 57 shots (85-76)w
    (South Dakota) avg 54.6spg had 57 shots (92-87)w
    (UMKC) avg 53.5spg had 45 shots (66-81)L
    (@Iowa) avg 60.8 spg had 51 shots (72-82)L
    (@Xavier) avg 55.9spg had 57 shots (63-86)L
    (NEBO) avg 61.3spg had 65 shots (83-72)w

    So as we can see above IPFW games have had totals of the following: 163, 161, 179, 147, 154, 149 & 152 as the lowest total IPFWhas played to all season was 147. Hell IPFW has already handled the leagues 2nd to last shots per game team in Valpo as they average just 44.8 shots per game ranking 345th overall as that game totaled 161 surpassing the 130's by a long shot. I'm more than willing to wager that Dartmouth is going to have good looks as IPFW is allowing their opponents to shot an eye popping 50% from the field this season which is most certainly in direct relation to their style of play on offense. I'm throwing down right now on a hefty size bet that says the offense of IPFW gets the better of this game and controls this one to a game which exceeds only the 130's easily. It's no wonder with these results that the books have given us only one opportunity this season to wager on a total in a IPFW game...POD
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    1st play is:

    Dartmouth@IUPU - Ft. Wayne over 136.5 for 20 units... It seems we have a situation here where a slow paced team meets the fast paced team. While Dartmouth is going to see many mid to 120's in their totals this season because of their 50.5 shots per game average IPFW is going to consistently see totals in the high 140's or even 150's as IPFW averages 63.5 shots per game. This is by far the fastest team Dartmouth has seen all season long as they have played against teams averaging 55.8, 52.1, 56, 53.1, 58.3, 56 & 54.5 shots per game. This is one of the main reasons you will see that Dartmouth is only allowing 62ppg on defense this season as their schedule has been a quite heavily in favor of slower to medium paced teams. Not to mention those teams that Dartmouth played are currently ranked in scoring offense as follows @ 175, 296, 266, 101, 209, 275 & 124. It's no wonder that Dartmouth is only allowing 62ppg against these numbers. IPFW comes into this game ranked 37th overall in scoring offense along with the already mentioned 63 and a half shots per game mentioned above. By far the fastest on highest scoring offense that Dartmouth as seen this year. It's also rather alarming that IPFW has allowed 5 of the 7 D-1 teams they have played this season to exceed their shot total per game average as here are their following opponents along with shot per game averages followed by the shots they attempted vs IPFW along with the score of the game.

    (@NEBO) avg 61.3spg had 73 shots (83-80ot)w
    (Valpo) avg 44.8spg had 57 shots (85-76)w
    (South Dakota) avg 54.6spg had 57 shots (92-87)w
    (UMKC) avg 53.5spg had 45 shots (66-81)L
    (@Iowa) avg 60.8 spg had 51 shots (72-82)L
    (@Xavier) avg 55.9spg had 57 shots (63-86)L
    (NEBO) avg 61.3spg had 65 shots (83-72)w

    So as we can see above IPFW games have had totals of the following: 163, 161, 179, 147, 154, 149 & 152 as the lowest total IPFWhas played to all season was 147. Hell IPFW has already handled the leagues 2nd to last shots per game team in Valpo as they average just 44.8 shots per game ranking 345th overall as that game totaled 161 surpassing the 130's by a long shot. I'm more than willing to wager that Dartmouth is going to have good looks as IPFW is allowing their opponents to shot an eye popping 50% from the field this season which is most certainly in direct relation to their style of play on offense. I'm throwing down right now on a hefty size bet that says the offense of IPFW gets the better of this game and controls this one to a game which exceeds only the 130's easily. It's no wonder with these results that the books have given us only one opportunity this season to wager on a total in a IPFW game...POD
     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:13 AM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by Messier-11:



    minus the ohio part
    Yeah no offense to anyone else living here but it's nothing special IMO. Although the Toledo and Columbus zoo's are about as good as it gets for zoo's in the United States. Much better than the Detroit zoo, San Diego zoo & Los Angeles zoo IMO. I also took a small trip from Toledo area to Columbus a few weeks back and must say Columbus area is freaking beautiful. There was an area I drove through with the wife and kids that made me feel like I was in Beverly Hills or something. I never would have guessed the Columbus area to be so beautiful. And I'm a wolverine fan....
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Messier-11:



    minus the ohio part
    Yeah no offense to anyone else living here but it's nothing special IMO. Although the Toledo and Columbus zoo's are about as good as it gets for zoo's in the United States. Much better than the Detroit zoo, San Diego zoo & Los Angeles zoo IMO. I also took a small trip from Toledo area to Columbus a few weeks back and must say Columbus area is freaking beautiful. There was an area I drove through with the wife and kids that made me feel like I was in Beverly Hills or something. I never would have guessed the Columbus area to be so beautiful. And I'm a wolverine fan....
     
    JimmyTarHeel
    JimmyTarHeel
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 1031
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:18 AM ET #16

    Nice write with great points. The total has gone down to 135 however which contradicts everything.  Dartmouths games have gone under just as much as FW has gone over.  Bet it's within 3 points either way.  BOL to ya keep the info comin
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nice write with great points. The total has gone down to 135 however which contradicts everything.  Dartmouths games have gone under just as much as FW has gone over.  Bet it's within 3 points either way.  BOL to ya keep the info comin
     
    CoverLane
    CoverLane
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 6903
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:25 AM ET #17

    Interesting stats on the total.

    With this being a home game for IPFW I like them to be able to dictate the pace. Could be a long night for Dartmouth if they aren't able to stop the break. Hence the 10 point spread. 

    Pinnacle has had $ come in on the under as I got the over at +102.
    Should be interesting to monitor the line movement on this one, it may go down in my opinion but I think the over is the correct play. Especially with the poor defensive schemes that IPFW has.




    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Interesting stats on the total.

    With this being a home game for IPFW I like them to be able to dictate the pace. Could be a long night for Dartmouth if they aren't able to stop the break. Hence the 10 point spread. 

    Pinnacle has had $ come in on the under as I got the over at +102.
    Should be interesting to monitor the line movement on this one, it may go down in my opinion but I think the over is the correct play. Especially with the poor defensive schemes that IPFW has.




     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:27 AM ET #18

    I actually just got it at 134.5 at bookmaker just now...

    Dartmouth@IUPU - Ft. Wayne over 134.5 for 20 units...POD



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I actually just got it at 134.5 at bookmaker just now...

    Dartmouth@IUPU - Ft. Wayne over 134.5 for 20 units...POD



     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:32 AM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyTarHeel:

    Nice write with great points. The total has gone down to 135 however which contradicts everything.  Dartmouths games have gone under just as much as FW has gone over.  Bet it's within 3 points either way.  BOL to ya keep the info comin
    But notice that Dartmouth has played a complete dosage of pretenders in relation to offense. I'm a believer here in this spot that the fact that we are even able to get a total in the 130's is strictly because of what you just said above as Dartmouth so far is 4-1 to the under so far this season. But noticing that Dartmouth has played again offense's that rank as the following at 
     175, 296, 266, 101, 209, 275 & 124 and combining that with the fact that IPFW is 37th overall in offense and on top of that the books haven't even given us but one total to bet on all season in IPFW games leads me to believe maybe they should have kept it that way for this game as well...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyTarHeel:

    Nice write with great points. The total has gone down to 135 however which contradicts everything.  Dartmouths games have gone under just as much as FW has gone over.  Bet it's within 3 points either way.  BOL to ya keep the info comin
    But notice that Dartmouth has played a complete dosage of pretenders in relation to offense. I'm a believer here in this spot that the fact that we are even able to get a total in the 130's is strictly because of what you just said above as Dartmouth so far is 4-1 to the under so far this season. But noticing that Dartmouth has played again offense's that rank as the following at 
     175, 296, 266, 101, 209, 275 & 124 and combining that with the fact that IPFW is 37th overall in offense and on top of that the books haven't even given us but one total to bet on all season in IPFW games leads me to believe maybe they should have kept it that way for this game as well...
     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:33 AM ET #20

    Quote Originally Posted by MARKY212:

    total went down what you think? this one may have a slow pace...
    Well i'm glad I don't bet games based on just line movement along. That would almost defeat the process i just went through to formulate this pick...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MARKY212:

    total went down what you think? this one may have a slow pace...
    Well i'm glad I don't bet games based on just line movement along. That would almost defeat the process i just went through to formulate this pick...
     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:35 AM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

    Interesting stats on the total.

    With this being a home game for IPFW I like them to be able to dictate the pace. Could be a long night for Dartmouth if they aren't able to stop the break. Hence the 10 point spread. 

    Pinnacle has had $ come in on the under as I got the over at +102.
    Should be interesting to monitor the line movement on this one, it may go down in my opinion but I think the over is the correct play. Especially with the poor defensive schemes that IPFW has.




    I also lean heavily to a wager on IPFW laying the points here. Dartmouth is out of their element in this game IMO...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

    Interesting stats on the total.

    With this being a home game for IPFW I like them to be able to dictate the pace. Could be a long night for Dartmouth if they aren't able to stop the break. Hence the 10 point spread. 

    Pinnacle has had $ come in on the under as I got the over at +102.
    Should be interesting to monitor the line movement on this one, it may go down in my opinion but I think the over is the correct play. Especially with the poor defensive schemes that IPFW has.




    I also lean heavily to a wager on IPFW laying the points here. Dartmouth is out of their element in this game IMO...
     
    CoverLane
    CoverLane
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 6903
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:37 AM ET #22

    Basically the math equation for this game would be the following:

    Fast tempo + Good Offence + Bad Defense = IPFW

    Slow tempo + Bad Offence + Good Defense = Dartmouth

    As oddsbuster has said, teams who play IPFW end up shooting MORE shots than their average. This benefits the over. They also play poor defense, which benefits the over. IPFW can score the ball, which benefits the over. Dartmouth can play D, which benefits the under. Dartmouth has struggles on offense, which benefits the under.

    Look for quick buckets from IPFW off Dartmouth misses.

    Looking at Dartmouth boxscores, one would be heavily influenced to play the under, hence the early line movement. But when IPFW puts up 75+ points tomorrow, the OVER is going to have a good chance of hitting.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Basically the math equation for this game would be the following:

    Fast tempo + Good Offence + Bad Defense = IPFW

    Slow tempo + Bad Offence + Good Defense = Dartmouth

    As oddsbuster has said, teams who play IPFW end up shooting MORE shots than their average. This benefits the over. They also play poor defense, which benefits the over. IPFW can score the ball, which benefits the over. Dartmouth can play D, which benefits the under. Dartmouth has struggles on offense, which benefits the under.

    Look for quick buckets from IPFW off Dartmouth misses.

    Looking at Dartmouth boxscores, one would be heavily influenced to play the under, hence the early line movement. But when IPFW puts up 75+ points tomorrow, the OVER is going to have a good chance of hitting.


     
    CoverLane
    CoverLane
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 6903
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:41 AM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

    I actually just got it at 134.5 at bookmaker just now...

    Dartmouth@IUPU - Ft. Wayne over 134.5 for 20 units...POD




    I got 136.5 with positive juice.

    Can't even get 134.5 on Pinnacle at this point in time. 

    Kind of sucks that I'll need an extra basket scored but lets hope this game hits 140 with about 3 minutes left.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

    I actually just got it at 134.5 at bookmaker just now...

    Dartmouth@IUPU - Ft. Wayne over 134.5 for 20 units...POD




    I got 136.5 with positive juice.

    Can't even get 134.5 on Pinnacle at this point in time. 

    Kind of sucks that I'll need an extra basket scored but lets hope this game hits 140 with about 3 minutes left.

     
    JimmyTarHeel
    JimmyTarHeel
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 1031
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:46 AM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

    But notice that Dartmouth has played a complete dosage of pretenders in relation to offense. I'm a believer here in this spot that the fact that we are even able to get a total in the 130's is strictly because of what you just said above as Dartmouth so far is 4-1 to the under so far this season. But noticing that Dartmouth has played again offense's that rank as the following at  175, 296, 266, 101, 209, 275 & 124 and combining that with the fact that IPFW is 37th overall in offense and on top of that the books haven't even given us but one total to bet on all season in IPFW games leads me to believe maybe they should have kept it that way for this game as well...

    yeah i never said I was taking under but it will be close.  if it continues to drop ill be right there with you on the Over.  Gonna sleep on it adn see what it does...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

    But notice that Dartmouth has played a complete dosage of pretenders in relation to offense. I'm a believer here in this spot that the fact that we are even able to get a total in the 130's is strictly because of what you just said above as Dartmouth so far is 4-1 to the under so far this season. But noticing that Dartmouth has played again offense's that rank as the following at  175, 296, 266, 101, 209, 275 & 124 and combining that with the fact that IPFW is 37th overall in offense and on top of that the books haven't even given us but one total to bet on all season in IPFW games leads me to believe maybe they should have kept it that way for this game as well...

    yeah i never said I was taking under but it will be close.  if it continues to drop ill be right there with you on the Over.  Gonna sleep on it adn see what it does...
     
     
    oddsbuster
    oddsbuster
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 20924
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2011 - 2:54 AM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

    Basically the math equation for this game would be the following:

    Fast tempo + Good Offence + Bad Defense = IPFW

    Slow tempo + Bad Offence + Good Defense = Dartmouth

    As oddsbuster has said, teams who play IPFW end up shooting MORE shots than their average. This benefits the over. They also play poor defense, which benefits the over. IPFW can score the ball, which benefits the over. Dartmouth can play D, which benefits the under. Dartmouth has struggles on offense, which benefits the under.

    Look for quick buckets from IPFW off Dartmouth misses.

    Looking at Dartmouth boxscores, one would be heavily influenced to play the under, hence the early line movement. But when IPFW puts up 75+ points tomorrow, the OVER is going to have a good chance of hitting.


    Except I think that IPFW has shown us their real identity as they have played slow teams already as well as medium to fast type teams also already. But Dartmouth seems to have not shown us their true identity just yet I have absolutely no faith in believing that Dartmouth is a good defense ball club based on their schedule alone...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

    Basically the math equation for this game would be the following:

    Fast tempo + Good Offence + Bad Defense = IPFW

    Slow tempo + Bad Offence + Good Defense = Dartmouth

    As oddsbuster has said, teams who play IPFW end up shooting MORE shots than their average. This benefits the over. They also play poor defense, which benefits the over. IPFW can score the ball, which benefits the over. Dartmouth can play D, which benefits the under. Dartmouth has struggles on offense, which benefits the under.

    Look for quick buckets from IPFW off Dartmouth misses.

    Looking at Dartmouth boxscores, one would be heavily influenced to play the under, hence the early line movement. But when IPFW puts up 75+ points tomorrow, the OVER is going to have a good chance of hitting.


    Except I think that IPFW has shown us their real identity as they have played slow teams already as well as medium to fast type teams also already. But Dartmouth seems to have not shown us their true identity just yet I have absolutely no faith in believing that Dartmouth is a good defense ball club based on their schedule alone...
    All Forums | College Basketball
    123 ... 678 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,684 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 302,165 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/17/2026 733 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,778 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 5,004 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,314 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 176 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,698 Covers arrow
    • DET@BUFF Under 55 Small Write up 3,157 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. Sept. 17, 2026 * NFL * TNF * Football Plays*** 3,881 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.