@Wizerguy
You might be onto something with Cleveland state my g
@RebelTell2
Yeah I know what you mean. But I stopped trying to read into lines. I am convinced there are no such thing as trap lines (even though some certainly look fishy). Line makers just want equal action. Adjust should it not be so. That explains sometimes easy wins when line off and also bad loses when line off. Happens both ways.
@RebelTell2
Yeah I know what you mean. But I stopped trying to read into lines. I am convinced there are no such thing as trap lines (even though some certainly look fishy). Line makers just want equal action. Adjust should it not be so. That explains sometimes easy wins when line off and also bad loses when line off. Happens both ways.
That was a home game for Stanford where they play better..vs on the road; Jekyll and Hyde team, and a road game for Utah @ Oregon. Utah is a Jekyll and Hyde team as well. However they did lose to Oregon in Utah 60-70. I base that on that Oregon owns them ( Match up issues) My methods are based on home /away dynamics within a 4 game series.
My theory: Stanford is on the road where they dont play well coming of 4 consecutive home games vs bad teams ( except Oregon not that bad) Their -28 in point differential on the road -7 ppg last 4 actually havent been on the road in a month. Utah has played a superior SOS at home with a 62 defense with a +49 point differential( +12 pts pg win margin) vs That SOS. I will see tonight if this model is accurate..
That was a home game for Stanford where they play better..vs on the road; Jekyll and Hyde team, and a road game for Utah @ Oregon. Utah is a Jekyll and Hyde team as well. However they did lose to Oregon in Utah 60-70. I base that on that Oregon owns them ( Match up issues) My methods are based on home /away dynamics within a 4 game series.
My theory: Stanford is on the road where they dont play well coming of 4 consecutive home games vs bad teams ( except Oregon not that bad) Their -28 in point differential on the road -7 ppg last 4 actually havent been on the road in a month. Utah has played a superior SOS at home with a 62 defense with a +49 point differential( +12 pts pg win margin) vs That SOS. I will see tonight if this model is accurate..
Still testing the systems, my data base has past season carbon copy models that confirm this play.
Still testing the systems, my data base has past season carbon copy models that confirm this play.
@jesron1269
Incorrect! Make no mistake my guy there are trap lines and they set these lines to make profit just like everyone else.. they don't set lines to get 50/50 action guaranteed!!
@jesron1269
Incorrect! Make no mistake my guy there are trap lines and they set these lines to make profit just like everyone else.. they don't set lines to get 50/50 action guaranteed!!
@RebelTell2
Utah was terrible without Gabe Madsen last game against Oregon. He's been the most difficult Ute for opposing defenses all season; his absence makes their offense more 1 dimensional. Stanford just beat Oregon too.
Madsen looks unlikely to play again tonight but needs to be monitored. Can't bet this game until we get that update, imo.
@RebelTell2
Utah was terrible without Gabe Madsen last game against Oregon. He's been the most difficult Ute for opposing defenses all season; his absence makes their offense more 1 dimensional. Stanford just beat Oregon too.
Madsen looks unlikely to play again tonight but needs to be monitored. Can't bet this game until we get that update, imo.
Cleveland St (14-9) won last 3 games
Detriot (8-15) lost last 3 games
It has moved to Cleveland st -1.5.
The fact they were dogs and honestly only a bucket fav. This line makes no sense to me.
You can't even argue they want equal action here.
BOL
Cleveland St (14-9) won last 3 games
Detriot (8-15) lost last 3 games
It has moved to Cleveland st -1.5.
The fact they were dogs and honestly only a bucket fav. This line makes no sense to me.
You can't even argue they want equal action here.
BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.