Marquette struggled with UCLA and Purdue is built 3X better that’s the Bruins. Bigs for Marquette has a high probability of struggling in the paint, leaving plenty of outside shooting…which Marquette is great at. The problem? Purdue is ranked top 10 @ defending the 3 @ 22%.
I feel relatively safe siding with Purdue. If they’re fighting in a battleground they’re your team equipped with both sword and armor. Marquette on the other fight with a good sword, but lacks armor.
fill em’
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Purdue -3 (Medium)
pending…Tennessee +1.5 (LARGE)
Marquette struggled with UCLA and Purdue is built 3X better that’s the Bruins. Bigs for Marquette has a high probability of struggling in the paint, leaving plenty of outside shooting…which Marquette is great at. The problem? Purdue is ranked top 10 @ defending the 3 @ 22%.
I feel relatively safe siding with Purdue. If they’re fighting in a battleground they’re your team equipped with both sword and armor. Marquette on the other fight with a good sword, but lacks armor.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.